Listen. I am NOT 20..so if you can't read my ad then

cowboy8055's Avatar
Maybe it's just me, but whenever I read poplips' reviews it seems like he's writing them for that exact purpose. Originally Posted by MC
It's pretty obvious he doesn't hold women in very high regard.
Hey Frankie, you are one of the best! You're beautiful, sexy and one of the finest chicks I have ever been with. Your looks, enthusiasm, and skills are all top of the mark. Screw him. I'm no spring chicken, but you are to me. I'll take a hot sexy woman with some experience any day to one of these 21 YO twinks. Every time I see a 20 something I leave disappointed. Can't wait to see you again.
It's pretty obvious he doesn't hold women in very high regard. Originally Posted by cowboy8055
....and sadly he is not alone in this regards.
A critical factual review is fine but there is no need to go out of your way to savage the girl.
I once wrote a "no" review, but was fairly certain the female would be returning to china, or North Korea ... If I felt she could read English, I would hesitate to post how disappointing our time spent together was.

Sayonara
hey ms fine.....sometimes men dont realize that aside from being a provider..we are real chics in the real world..and we can be affected by their behavior and the words they choose to use as they express them to others...dont let this get you down.....

your time with this gent was spent trying to make him as comfortable as you can..if he cannot get in sync with the situation..that is his mind block..not yours...

you'll be alright ..you have a big following..i doubt your biz will be affected...most likely..it will get better...
stay on your game and keep on keepin on.....ag....
Frankie Fine's Avatar
Thanks Anita!

And everyone else too!!

xo
Frankie
pyramider's Avatar
Anita is wise beyond her 476 years ...
Is this a joke?
pyramider's Avatar
No joke, Anita is 476 years old.
I do not like to defend certain points I make in my reviews or observations I may make on this site.* Usually I find it entertaining enough seeing some people get all worked up.* But after reading so many misguided, clueless, and even idiotic voices here I felt I need to make some observations. *

First off, I do not think the review in question was harsh at all.* Anyone will see that in this review I recommended Frankie Fine and praised her skills, and personality, which I feel that is the general consensus among all the reviews on Frankie Fine; however, when it came to assessing her looks I was let down.* I think that qualifies as a fair and honest review.* Reviews should point the bad and good, as observed by the reviewer, and weigh in as to whether the provider is good or bad.* I wasn’t thrilled with certain aspects of this provider and I was with others. * I was just not overly attracted to her.* I have come to realize that some men’s assessment of the way a woman looks is based on the company he has entertained to date, it maybe I’ve had the pleasure to have been with prettier girls than most of the reviewers here.* I am not trying to be insulting here, but offering an explanation why I was not overwhelmed by the way Frankie Fine looked or even for that matter Alyssa Lace as so many here feel these are very attractive women.* With this said, you can also say that one’s critique of a provider’s overall skill can be based on the experience or connoisseurship of the reviewer.* I will be the last to say that I am versed in all human proclivities or adept at assessing who has given me the best blowjob.* I get a hardon first thing in the morning just sipping on my coffee.* But I think one can say inasmuch as this review is an anomaly it may be my presence here is one too, and* I may not fit the overall characteristic of hobbyist.*

Also, many comments have been made regarding my supposed misogyny.* This I think is the most ironic statement I have discovered in these posts on this thread.* First off, let’s be honest.* The providers here are and far and few who are in this because they want to.* Most providers, and I think there are studies and literature out there, suggest (Dear supposed behavior scientist in previous life, maybe you can spend your time finding them or find those that contradict my observation) that this trade is usually practiced by people with serious addictions, and those addictions unfortunately, can and will destroy lives.* I doubt that most providers do this because they love it and want to.* Please I do not need providers now posting affirmations that this is the life they choose and life and couldn’t see themselves doing anything else in life.* I am not saying ALL, I’m sure there are people doing this that seriously want to do it, that this their lifelong aspiration, their dreams come to fruition, the ever-coveted goal of their career.* After all, who wouldnt want their daughters to grow up to be providers? I’m sure the money is good.* I’m sure you could make 3 grand if not more in a weekend.* But innately this hobby is about misogyny.* The money you give that provider will be used to fuel their addictions, to reenforce for them that this is all they’re good at.* * Im sure most providers may want to be lawyers, doctors, nurses, writers, presidents of the USA or prime ministers of Canada, and I have no doubt they do not lack the intelligence or skill to do that, but society, their experiences, and we must include ourselves in this, have indirectly or directly told them they could not. *

You know how they call you sweetie, or babe, or say things I’ cant wait to meet you.* I’m looking forward to meeting you, and I want that dick in my mouth.* You are paying them to say this, you are paying them to be sweet, to give you head, to spread their legs for you.* They are not doing this because they want you and are excited about being with you.* Does anybody here think that Jenna the thief was happy doing this?* As many have you noted when some of them get in this business they usually get hooked on something or they do this because they are hooked on something.* Jenna at one time had more tricks than a rabbit.* The girl is now going to school, off the prohibitive topic, in a relationship, and servicing me and the rest of you guys is the last thing she wants to be doing.* When she started running away with our money, we all will all pissed and saying she needed to get her act together.* That was her prerogative and if she wanted to do that she could.* For us to think that she owed us something because she took our our measly 200 bucks was pretty misogynistic thinking on our part, that somehow paying a woman money means she owes us something.* Ideally, the 200 you give a potential provider should only be for her to decide upon meeting you and seeing you if she will let you fuck her.* Remember guys, and I‘m surprised the Behavioral Scientist did not include this, Misogyny is a belief system that places women in a subordinate role limiting them to access and decision-making. *

I have had the fortune of traveling to europe and partaking in its respective hobby experiences.* Obviously, they are many reasons for the providers in that area to be doing what they’re doing.* It is legal in Spain and Amsterdam.* Studies in Spain show that at least 40% of all men have at least used a provider at one time or another.* I can tell you being in Madrid at 2am leaving the bar with friends, you have beautiful young girls hollering for your time.* There is much competition, and each one is by far the most beautiful girl you’ve seen in this trade.* I have even been to mega brothels, and there you find such an assortment in just a few feet of cubic space than you would find in all of Buffalo and Niagara Falls area.* And for 30 bucks you get head and full service. So sometimes it is difficult for me to justify paying 200 for an average looking provider in this area.* The other day I contacted a provider in the Buffalo area who suggested she would discount the 375 hour rate if I could get her a gram of the prohibitive topic.* In* no way did I say anything from which she could infer I had the resources to do this for her, but it showed how desperate she must have been to just come out and ask for this.* And she wanted $375 for the hr on top of that.* I asked for some pictures to be sent to me, and I was so underwhelmed I couldn’t believe this girl really thought a hobbyist would pay that much for an average-looking girl hooked on prohibitive topics. *

The literature I have read about this hobby is sufficient to not put blinders about what I do with these girls.* Reading your posts here sometimes I think some of you do have blinders on. * Accusing someone of misogyny on this site is the most redonkulous (ridiculous, for those not familiar with this word) thing you could possibly do. *

You could look at this profession in two extreme ways.* 1) how sad.* lonely men paying money for any woman to give them pussy.* being taken advantage of by these women,* so desperate for pussy and love they will pay anything OR* 2) these poor women being victimized by perverted old men. Obviously they need money, and these men are taking* advantage of them.* or hooked on drugs and need money to fuel their habits, or working for a pimp and being forced to do this. *

Making these two observations, in no way, represents my views about this hobby.* They are stated as extreme judgements outsiders may make.* I think, having in a way ethnographically delved into this world, I stand somewhere between those two poles as I think most of us should, to keep a healthy perspective.* For us the truth lies somewhere between these two poles.* *

Frankie fine, in the review, I recommended you.* The review stated that I* would repeat my encounter with you with readjusted expectations.* I did* not look down on you while we were doing our thing.* Even though I was lukewarm about my physical attraction toward you, the reviews regarding your skills were enough to encourage me to continue with our tryst.* I fear you were insulted by my honest claim that I was not overly attracted to you as I hoped I would be.* That was unfortunate, but your skills made up for it as reflected on my YES recommendation.* You may say I have issues, but the wisest thing you could have done, as you stated, was look at my review objectively.* You were recommended, my review and the others on this site all agree you are extremely skillful.* We only differ in that I did not find you as physically attractive as others have, but in no means did I say you were a dog.
mad469s's Avatar
POPLIPS, beauty is in the eyes of the beholder, And when I be holding Frankie, I find nothing wrong with her looks. But, then again what I see, isn't the same as what you see. I guess my question is, if you didn't like what you saw when the door opened, why the fuck didn't you turn around and walk.
Frankie Fine's Avatar
@ PL- thanks for posting. Happy Hobbying.
Frankie, is that a permanent Homer tattoo?
* But after reading so many misguided, clueless, and even idiotic voices here I felt I need to make some observations. *

Also, many comments have been made regarding my supposed misogyny.* This I think is the most ironic statement I have discovered in these posts on this thread.*

You could look at this profession in two extreme ways.* 1) how sad.* lonely men paying money for any woman to give them pussy.* being taken advantage of by these women,* so desperate for pussy and love they will pay anything OR* 2) these poor women being victimized by perverted old men. Obviously they need money, and these men are taking* advantage of them.* or hooked on drugs and need money to fuel their habits, or working for a pimp and being forced to do this. *

Making these two observations, in no way, represents my views about this hobby.* They are stated as extreme judgements outsiders may make.* I think, having in a way ethnographically delved into this world, I stand somewhere between those two poles as I think most of us should, to keep a healthy perspective.* For us the truth lies somewhere between these two poles.* *
Originally Posted by poplips
@ PL- thanks for posting. Happy Hobbying. Originally Posted by Frankie Fine
LMAO!

These two posts show the difference between an example of a boring, self-aggrandizing missive (even in its edited form) littered with scores of *'s left by God knows what funky OS or worse, some nervous tic that manifests itself in lockstep with both poorly-understood terminology and a penchant for misspelling and one that offers a classy, non-accusatory reply.

I'll leave the choice of which is which to those of you reading them.