George W Bush: Was he really that bad?

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

You proved what??? I have repeatedly posted the statement made by Biden in 2002. You proved nothing. Just another lie.

And Clinton left Al Queda in place to launch their attack on America...............

Clinton got blow jobs, while Bin Laden planned....................... .

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

No ifs, ands, or buts; President Clinton said Iraq had a weapons of mass destruction program that represented a threat....

But Timmyboy says it is all a lie, promoted by Bush (Bush would become president until 2001)...that is three years after the above Clinton statement.




Followed up by Clinton's national security adviser Berger on the same day:

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

But Timmyboy thinks Bush made up this script as well.................. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

no, Bush went in after a team of inspectors determined Saddam didn't have any WMD's

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 Originally Posted by Whirlaway

I'm trying to remember. Was Al Gore the VP in 2002? Or was he out of a job at that point? Writing books about global warming.

Keep trying dimwit. Nothing is going to change it. Your boy was POTUS. You elected him.

Gore made it clear he knew that Iraq had WMDs...........he made that statement while the Iraq war debate was taking place....

In other words, Gore thought it important to go on record saying he "knew" Iraq had weapons of mass destruction !

Gore made it clear he knew that Iraq had WMDs...........he made that statement while the Iraq war debate was taking place....

In other words, Gore thought it important to go on record saying he "knew" Iraq had weapons of mass destruction ! Originally Posted by Whirlaway

If true, it is an important point that Al Gore offered his immense prestige and credibility to the inaccurate information career bureaucrats provided to the President influencing his decision to get us in that disastrous war. Did the Libertarians oppose the war effort?

Amazing. You boys are wrong. You're trying to argue what "everybody knew," like you knew what everybody knew. What everybody found out was that he had nothing.

We inspected Iraq. He had nothing. Whatever program he had in 1998 was GONE. Whatever stockpiles of WMD he had had been used or destroyed. A lot can happen in three years ... unless you're trying to get legislation through the Republican controlled House...

Clinton this. Gore that. BULLSHIT! BUSH was POTUS when the attacks came on 9/11 and had been for more than NINE months.

What we found out is that Bush and Cheney lied to us and the world, yet had no compunction about plunging America and the world into a senseless war.

They lied to every Democrat too; who were just as eager to kick some ass after 9/11 as anyone else. You list is meaningless Whirlyturd. Your way of refuting an argument is to say "look what the other guy did..." That doesn't make it factual.

And the FACT is, there were NO FUCKING WMDs.

You are wrong. Quit trying to argue as if there is some way to make yourselves right.

AssUp the idiot with his head up his ass gets it all wrong again............there were WMDs found in Iraq, just not the level of stockpiles that intelligence thought............see how the left lies...............

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010...ising-results/

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/interna...7pDf7AZ3RO9qnM

.......
And the FACT is, there were NO FUCKING WMDs.
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Of course, with his head up his ass 24/7, it is no wonder AssUp is clueless what is going on in the world.

If true, it is an important point that Al Gore offered his immense prestige and credibility to the inaccurate information career bureaucrats provided to the President influencing his decision to get us in that disastrous war. Did the Libertarians oppose the war effort? Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer

Yes, Al Gore, functional idiot on global warming. Wise, all-knowing sage on WMD. Well, pick and choose eh Whirly?

I am also impressed with the way Whirlyturd can read Gore's mind. Discerning that his statement was based not on what the Bush vulcans were selling but on an independent investigation! Or perhaps based on 5 year old information?

No matter. Nothing is going to change it. The debacle belongs to Shrub and the Republicans and it always will. That, and the trashing of the US economy has driven independents away from the idea that a Republican has the brains to occupy the executive branch. And, this last election only reinforced that impression with the short bus 'tard candidates the GOP paraded around the country for 12 months. Too funny.

if there had been any wnd;s found in Iraq, Bush would have been perched on top of the WH screaming I TOLD YOU over a loud speaker

AssUp the idiot with his head up his ass gets it all wrong again............there were WMDs found in Iraq, just not the level of stockpiles that intelligence thought............see how the left lies...............

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010...ising-results/

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/interna...7pDf7AZ3RO9qnM



Of course, with his head up his ass 24/7, it is no wonder AssUp is clueless what is going on in the world. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

And just when you thought he couldn't be any more stupid.....he proves you wrong. By completely reversing course and announcing what everybody knows: There were, in fact, WMD's in Iraq.

Boggles the mind.

Why don't you fucking read the article, Whirlyturd. Out loud, so you understand it.

They found a daisy in the sand, too... I guess that proves that they had biofloral weapons too.

Again, AssUP.

Did they find WMDs in Iraq ?

You are claiming it is a "FACT, there were NO FUCKING WMDs."

I presented several articles that says they did find WMDs.................

Where is your proof that NO WMDs were found ?

Again, AssUP.

Did they find WMDs in Iraq ?

You are claiming it is a "FACT, there were NO FUCKING WMDs."

I presented several articles that says they did find WMDs.................

Where is your proof that NO WMDs were found ? Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Now, we're getting down to it. Where is the proof that nothing was found? Eh?

God, you are an incredible fuck-up.

Final CIA report: No WMD
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/7634313/ns...md-found-iraq/

Wiki: No WMD
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_an...ss_destruction

Karl Rove admits: NO WMD
http://www.therightperspective.org/2...found-in-iraq/