TJ1965 i am a gun owner love all of them Originally Posted by adiGood for you, I like mine as well.
but i can not bring them to work with me . Originally Posted by adiBut you can. The question is, are you willing to deal with the consequence of your employer finding out.
Thats rule #1 he broke , Originally Posted by adiAnd yet he did not break the law.
not following what you were taught and trained by the police is # 2 . Originally Posted by adiA 911 operator does not give lawful orders. Sometimes following their suggestions can get you killed.
The rules citzens patrol have were broke # 3 why the fuck is that hard to understand for you ? Originally Posted by adiHe still had not broken any laws. Do you understand that?
you've got 4 reviews under your belt is that a reason for me to follow you and shoot you cause you look like guy who is breaking the law ? Originally Posted by adiYou are free to do what you feel you have to do. You are free to follow me, and ask me what I'm doing. I have the right to ignore you. I do not have the right to punch you or assault you in any way. The moment you attempt to do physical harm to me, be prepared for a response.
I HATE THUGS !!!! Originally Posted by adino argument there.
maybe he was but it does not give me the right to shoot him or anyone else !! Originally Posted by adiYou are correct, but the right to shoot someone does begin when they physically assault you.
if you feel that way go clean arline up bissonett up and haverstock apartments for us . Originally Posted by adiI will deal with threats to my person/family when the time comes.
So, walking in the rain to the corner store is now considered criminal.........This may come as a surprise to some but people do walk in the rain. GZ had no legal authority to stop, impede, inquire, address, or in other way confront TM. Originally Posted by lostincypressYou raise an interesting point ... hopefully will be addressed in the trial by one side ...
TM was walking in an unfamiliar neighborhood and GZ calls 911 to report himbegan to follow him. Has a crime been committed? TM starts running and GZ continues pursuit. Has a crime been committed? The 911 operator tells GZ to stop chasing TM. Whether he obeys or not, no crime is committed. (I believe GZ when he says he stopped the chase and was returning to his car at this point) When TM confronts GZ and asks you got a problem? Still, no crime has been committed. But once TM responds to GZ's answer with, "You do now!" AND HE PUNCHES GZ and knocks him to the ground...A crime of assault and battery has just been committed. Anything that occurred before this point is absolutely irrelevant. Everything that occurs after this point is! GZ had his nose broken, his head was bashed into the concrete sidewalk and then he defended his life the only way he could. This was not stand your ground. This was self defense pure and simple.Zimmermans lawyer should use this as a closing argument.
We can speculate about all the what if's you want... What if Trayvon hadn't been suspended for drugs. What if He hadn't gone out for a walk on a rainy night to go buy some Skittles and iced tea (what normal person does this in the rain anyway). What if George hadn't got out of his car. What if George didn't have a conceal/carry license. etc. It doesn't matter! Originally Posted by hardwood
I even play golf in the rain......... Originally Posted by lostincypress.. how's that work out with the traps?