I'll be Dammed...

Yeah...let's talk about spin...I noticed you convienently omitted the namecalling you accused me of because it does not exist... and hey...you and you alone chastised me in a very strong way about how I dealt with the youngster...tell you what Johnny..I'm going to foward you the PM...yeah..you read it and then tell me where I was wrong to poke him...sorry man...the fact that you protested so strongly and you were the ONLY one gave me great pause...hey you didn't call me a "d-bag" and a "prick" after I said anything...you stated that you "always" thought I was those terms of endearment...I've critisized what you posted... and the worst name I ever called you was "Johnnyboy"...

PM on the way... Originally Posted by malwoody

I thought those were just pet names people had for you?

I thought those were just pet names people had for you? Originally Posted by KenMonk

Like I said...he has my permission to call me whatever mekes him feel better about himself...if that's what it takes...He just kept calling me the namecaller and I got to wondering, so I did a little research..and it turns out that I never really was..

Like I said...he has my permission to call me whatever mekes him feel better about himself...if that's what it takes...He just kept calling me the namecaller and I got to wondering, so I did a little research..and it turns out that I never really was.. Originally Posted by malwoody

I must have missed that

I must have missed that Originally Posted by KenMonk

I doubt it..

Yeah...let's talk about spin...I noticed you convienently omitted the namecalling you accused me of because it does not exist... and hey...you and you alone chastised me in a very strong way about how I dealt with the youngster...tell you what Johnny..I'm going to foward you the PM...yeah..you read it and then tell me where I was wrong to poke him...sorry man...the fact that you protested so strongly and you were the ONLY one gave me great pause...hey you didn't call me a "d-bag" and a "prick" after I said anything...you stated that you "always" thought I was those terms of endearment...I've critisized what you posted... and the worst name I ever called you was "Johnnyboy"...

PM on the way... Originally Posted by malwoody

Trollwooddy, you have suggested in this public forum that i am a safety issue to providers, and that i was involved in a threat sent to you by someone else. That is serious shit. You don't seem to understand that.

Trollwooddy, you have suggested in this public forum that i am a safety issue to providers, and that i was involved in a threat sent to you by someone else. That is serious shit. You don't seem to understand that. Originally Posted by Johnny4455

Is it really, one persons opinion. Its everything after the fact that would cause people to take pause. Let it go bro.

I am reminded of a repeated exchange from the movie The Agony and the Ecstasy.

Pope Julius II: "When will you make an end?"
Michelangelo: "When I am finished!"

In post number 22 Mr. Woody I asked a simple question that you have ignored throughout this thread. All of your white knights have chimed in. I really don't care what any of them have to say. I did not ask any of them the question. I asked you. In your Parry Mason/Point counter point/law and order/ lawyer wannabe breakdown of every single sentence posted by anybody who even dares comment on one of your posts, I still have to ask my question from post # 22 "" On a information "exchange board" concerning hookers, unless you have a review to contribute, why the fuck do you even post? "

I will let you off the hook Mr. Wood. Just let the record show for everyone to read and possibly enjoy that sometimes a non answer speaks more than when you actually do hit the keyboard. So you do not have to answer me. My opinion probably won't change anyway.

PS. Sorry about the democrat reference. Below the belt in these times. Oh, and do you think I still may have anger issues? Shit...thats two questions now.

PTP...you have answered your own question....this is an "information exchange board".

You continue to think that is solely related to reviews. Silly PTP.

I would say, don't hold the rest of us to your total lack of understanding as to what that means..

But you really don't care what the rest of us say.......

Look, there is that camel from that commercial, burying his head in the sand!!! Luv the commercial, and the tie in here

In post number 22 Mr. Woody I asked a simple question that you have ignored throughout this thread. All of your white knights have chimed in. I really don't care what any of them have to say. I did not ask any of them the question. I asked you. In your Parry Mason/Point counter point/law and order/ lawyer wannabe breakdown of every single sentence posted by anybody who even dares comment on one of your posts, I still have to ask my question from post # 22 "" On a information "exchange board" concerning hookers, unless you have a review to contribute, why the fuck do you even post? "

I will let you off the hook Mr. Wood. Just let the record show for everyone to read and possibly enjoy that sometimes a non answer speaks more than when you actually do hit the keyboard. So you do not have to answer me. My opinion probably won't change anyway.

PS. Sorry about the democrat reference. Below the belt in these times. Oh, and do you think I still may have anger issues? Shit...thats two questions now. Originally Posted by parttimeplayer

The answer is very simple, because he fucking wants to. But the reality is, those in the loop dont really have to rely on reviews, because in many cases they are just the writers penthouse forum letter.

In post number 22 Mr. Woody I asked a simple question that you have ignored throughout this thread. All of your white knights have chimed in. I really don't care what any of them have to say. I did not ask any of them the question. I asked you. In your Parry Mason/Point counter point/law and order/ lawyer wannabe breakdown of every single sentence posted by anybody who even dares comment on one of your posts, I still have to ask my question from post # 22 "" On a information "exchange board" concerning hookers, unless you have a review to contribute, why the fuck do you even post? "

I will let you off the hook Mr. Wood. Just let the record show for everyone to read and possibly enjoy that sometimes a non answer speaks more than when you actually do hit the keyboard. So you do not have to answer me. My opinion probably won't change anyway.

PS. Sorry about the democrat reference. Below the belt in these times. Oh, and do you think I still may have anger issues? Shit...thats two questions now. Originally Posted by parttimeplayer

Reviews aren't the end all be all. Reviews are basically opinion pieces, and in some cases fluff/advertising pieces. Not everyone feels the need to post a review to entertain the huddled masses. You're make too big of a deal of the entire situation.

Thanks VK, DD and KM. With All due respect, I addressed that post to Mr. Woodward. I can appreciate your need to chime in and defend. That is what good defenders of the wood do. (This pretty much sums up my white knight statement) But by asking a direct question a second time to Malwood, I am told I am silly, out of the loop, (and you wonder where the cool guy club talk comes from) and I am making to big a deal of the "situation". and none of those quotes came from Mr. Wood himself.

Are you all speaking for Mr. Malwood yourself? Or could it be interpreted that you guys might be making "too big of deal of the entire situation " yourselves. I cant answer that because I am not in the loop. (Your loop anyway)

I never said that reviews are the only thing that matters. The other posting options are quite helpful and entertaining. But to defend your position by saying reviews are not neccessary is to me saying that the other 10,000 posts between the 4 of you is a good reason to log in and follow all the "in the know" cool stuff you all have to say.

Get a grip. Without reviews, no board. Without a board to post reviews, you have no place to share your "in the loop" information. (KM your exempt here. You have posted reviews). KM, you don't have to answer this, but I am completely confused by your logic.
How many times has someone shared in a thread somewhere an experience with the subject of the thread and then they have been asked repeatedly, "where is your review" ? You could almost say that would be one way to "entertain" the masses. Wouldn't it.

Gezzz PTP, let's take a look at your last post....

None of us are here to defend MW...he is perfectly capable of doing that himself. Yes, your original post was directed to MW. I'm sure he will answer at his leisure. But to label us WK's...now that's silly.

As far as your comment making it "too big of the entire situation"...again not understanding where that came from. I was merely reacting to your post!!!

As far as your comment that "reviews are not necessary"....that never came from me, and frankly I don't see it coming from any of the other posters on this thread. I have thank those that have posted realistic & honest reviews a number of times. It just amazes me how certain people think that without reviews, posters have nothing to bring to the board. I can think of 4 or 5 "reviewers" who not only based on their reviews, but there general posting...have absolutely nothing to bring to the board.

I would guess, under that logic, out your postings only 20 had any meaningful contribution, lol

PTP, overall, I think you are a valued member to this community...and yes, your not a member of the "cool kid group" wink!!!.

But really, this nonsense of no review equals lack of substance...that is truly a checkers vs chess move

Ok VK. I'm in. Okay, I will quit calling you a Malwoody "white Knight".Coming to his defense in a post directed at him would be called what.....? We can come up with something later.

It was KM that made the "to big a deal" comment. Not you. That maybe why you have no understanding. The reviews "not necessary" comment also came from KM.

Your part of my post is when you called me "silly". That I took from your post. Not reading the other posts between yours and mine and then stating you do not know where I am coming from, hell, VK that might just be silly.

LOL, 20 minus 0 is still 20, LOL! That means according to your math, one in 17 of my posts have meaning. I will let you do your own math on your ratio.

Keep in mind we would not be going back and forth had you not answered a post directed at someone else. Silly? Aint it!

Is it really, one persons opinion. Its everything after the fact that would cause people to take pause. Let it go bro. Originally Posted by dirty dog

I have lots of respect for you dd, but respectfully disagree wi you here. Yes trollwoodys wild speculation is his opinion, and his only, but speculating on whether someone on the board is making threats or is a safety issue is out of bounds. Trollwoody knows that. I doubt whether any provider is reading this, and if they are, I'm pretty sure they don't believe his wild ass speculation, but that doesn't mean, in my opinion, i should just let it go. Just a matter of time before he picks out another target. It won't be you dd, and it should not have been me.