In case you haven't noticed, Obama is about to lose Iraq

What did you think was misspelled? Originally Posted by i'va biggen

"Are"! "Are" is spelled "a-r-e", Ekim the Inbred Chimp: "The One Second Man". Plus, you stupidly used the adjective "stupid" instead of the noun "stupidity", Ekim the Inbred Chimp: "The One Second Man". Hence, you're just bound and determined to hold onto your title as the most stupid poster in this forum, Ekim the Inbred Chimp: "The One Second Man".

"Are"! "Are" is spelled "a-r-e", Ekim the Inbred Chimp: "The One Second Man". Plus, you stupidly used the adjective "stupid" instead of the noun "stupidity", Ekim the Inbred Chimp: "The One Second Man". Hence, you're just bound and determined to hold onto your title as the most stupid poster in this forum, Ekim the Inbred Chimp: "The One Second Man". Originally Posted by I B Hankering

What I figured you floundering flummox, Can't even read on top of being a cocksucker.. So what is it going to be no balls? Lies or are you just stupid? You dumb mother fucker.

What I figured you floundering flummox, Can't even read on top of being a cocksucker.. So what is it going to be no balls? Lies or are you just stupid? You dumb mother fucker. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

What does that have to do with Iraq, Slobbrin?

Not a Goddamned thing. Not even close.

Slobbrin, you're out of your element. SHUT THE FUCK UP.

What does that have to do with Iraq, Slobbrin?

Not a Goddamned thing. Not even close.

Slobbrin, you're out of your element. SHUT THE FUCK UP. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

[QUOTE=LexusLover;1055716088]Yea, COG, you got it right again ..... Well, yes. It's getting to be a habit.

So you think "poverty" and "oppression" motivates the ISIS? Where the hell did you get this? I never even alluded to this.

Have you been taking lessons from WPF in making stuff up, putting it down, and patting yourself on your back? You learned well.

What I figured you floundering flummox, Can't even read on top of being a cocksucker.. So what is it going to be no balls? Lies or are you just stupid? You dumb mother fucker. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

The reading skills are just fine, Ekim the Inbred Chimp: "The One Second Man". It's your lib-retarded POV and your grammar, spelling and punctuation that are completely fucked up, Ekim the Inbred Chimp: "The One Second Man".

BTW, Ekim the Inbred Chimp: "The One Second Man", U.S. forces are back in Iraq and bombing in Iraq despite your most asinine assertion that your boy Odumbo would never let it happen! How's that "Hope and CHANGE" working for you, Ekim the Inbred Chimp: "The One Second Man"?

The reading skills are just fine, Ekim the Inbred Chimp: "The One Second Man". It's your lib-retarded POV and your grammar, spelling and punctuation that are completely fucked up, Ekim the Inbred Chimp: "The One Second Man".

BTW, Ekim the Inbred Chimp: "The One Second Man", U.S. forces are back in Iraq and bombing in Iraq despite your most asinine assertion that your boy Odumbo would never let it happen! How's that "Hope and CHANGE" working for you, Ekim the Inbred Chimp: "The One Second Man"? Originally Posted by I B Hankering

What is it going to be no balls you little piss ant lies or stupid? Your skills as little as they were are fading fast, your credibility as small as it was is now non existent. Time to man up and give a answer no balls. Stupid or LIES ?

How much Islamic terrorism was committed against the west before we started interfering with them in order to support multinational oil corporations? I'm not saying it didn't exist, but before we overthrew the elected government of Iran, and started butting in all over the Middle East, they didn't give a rat's ass about us, our lifestyle, our freedom or our hamburgers. They were killing each other, and happy as hell.

The "War on Terror" is good business. Well played, international bankers and corporatists. Well played. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Then I'll approach from a different angle to address your point ...

By suggesting that "the west" began to "interfere" with "them" (Islamists) and that is the cause of "Islamic terrorism" you are connecting the two in a cause and effect relationship ... meaning ... "the west" is the blame for the "Islamic terrorism" ... because we began to "butt into their lives" ... by introducing them to "our lifestyle, our freedom, or our hamburgers" ...

They don't want "the west" over there, because "the west" ....

has an enjoyable lifestyle, freedom to enjoy that lifestyle, and hamburgers (with beef in them I "assume" is the problem) ...

.. so our way of life is not oppressive and stagnated by poverty.

They prefer tents and camels? And are opposed to palaces and Ferraris?

Then I'll approach from a different angle to address your point ...

By suggesting that "the west" began to "interfere" with "them" (Islamists) and that is the cause of "Islamic terrorism" you are connecting the two in a cause and effect relationship ... meaning ... "the west" is the blame for the "Islamic terrorism" ... because we began to "butt into their lives" ... by introducing them to "our lifestyle, our freedom, or our hamburgers" ...

They don't want "the west" over there, because "the west" ....

has an enjoyable lifestyle, freedom to enjoy that lifestyle, and hamburgers (with beef in them I "assume" is the problem) ...

.. so our way of life is not oppressive and stagnated by poverty.

They prefer tents and camels? And are opposed to palaces and Ferraris? Originally Posted by LexusLover

The first thing that pissed them off was a little thing called the Crusades.

What is it going to be no balls you little piss ant lies or stupid? Your skills as little as they were are fading fast, your credibility as small as it was is now non existent. Time to man up and give a answer no balls. Stupid or LIES ? Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Did you hear the latest news, Ekim the Inbred Chimp: "The One Second Man"?

"Backed by U.S. air power, Kurdish forces later took back control of Mosul dam."

U.S. forces are back in Iraq and bombing in Iraq despite your dim-retarded claim that your boy Odumbo would never let it happen! How's that "Hope and CHANGE" working for you, Ekim the Inbred Chimp: "The One Second Man"?

How's it working for you, Massa Overseer? Are you happy for the Kurds, Turd? Is this what you WANT America to be doing?

If not, then shut the fuck up.

If so, then SHUT THE FUCK UP!

Did you hear the latest news, Ekim the Inbred Chimp: "The One Second Man"?



U.S. forces are back in Iraq and bombing in Iraq despite your dim-retarded claim that your boy Odumbo would never let it happen! How's that "Hope and CHANGE" working for you, Ekim the Inbred Chimp: "The One Second Man"? Originally Posted by I B Hankering

No balls you have become irrelevant You are one trick pony. Take something out of context lie then compound the lie by parroting the same drivel over and over. You have become boring, so fuck off little piss ant you won't even man up and tell us if it is lies or if you are just stupid.

Then I'll approach from a different angle to address your point ...

By suggesting that "the west" began to "interfere" with "them" (Islamists) and that is the cause of "Islamic terrorism" you are connecting the two in a cause and effect relationship ... meaning ... "the west" is the blame for the "Islamic terrorism" ... because we began to "butt into their lives" ... by introducing them to "our lifestyle, our freedom, or our hamburgers" ...

They don't want "the west" over there, because "the west" ....

has an enjoyable lifestyle, freedom to enjoy that lifestyle, and hamburgers (with beef in them I "assume" is the problem) ...

.. so our way of life is not oppressive and stagnated by poverty.

They prefer tents and camels? And are opposed to palaces and Ferraris? Originally Posted by LexusLover

You missed my point and made up your own. This is becoming a pattern for you. Like WPF, the only way to win an argument is to make up opposition points and then tear them down. Loser.

I never said anything about introducing them to western culture. All we wanted was to capture their oil, so multinational corporations could gouge us for it, rather than the rightful owners. We overthrow their governments. We kill their children. We steal their assets. And then we are shocked when they fight back. Seriously? They don't give a rat's ass about our culture or our freedom (well, whatever is left of freedom, anyway). They want their stuff back, and they want to be left alone.

Now make something up and respond.

You missed my point ...

All we wanted was to capture their oil, so multinational corporations could gouge us for it, rather than the rightful owners. We overthrow their governments. We kill their children. We steal their assets. And then we are shocked when they fight back. Seriously? They don't give a rat's ass about our culture or our freedom (well, whatever is left of freedom, anyway). They want their stuff back, and they want to be left alone.

Now make something up and respond. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

I don't need to. You just did. That's your propoganda and spin on things.

Why should I respond to your bullshit? This is what you posted:

"but before we overthrew the elected government of Iran, and started butting in all over the Middle East, they didn't give a rat's ass about us, our lifestyle, our freedom or our hamburgers."

My neighbors down the street could say the same about me ....

... and start "sapper attacks" on my structures and associated visible property, because "wifey" is whining that we got more than they do!

You probably cannot find any reliable sources that identify a military and/or quasi-military operation orchestrated by the U.S. (without local invitation and cooperation) that resulted in the implantation of a U.S. oil company to explore and drill for "assets," which was subsequently "STOLEN" by the U.S. and/or a U.S. oil company. See OPEC.

Example: During the Carter administration he shit canned a proposed agreement between Pemex and Texaco ... a "partnership" with Pemex having the reserves and Texaco having the technology to develop/extract the reserves.

The Soviets used our technology, as well as around the world.

As far as petroleum income and assets, OPEC and the likes wouldn't have 2 nickles to rub together if it were not for U.S. technology and know-how.

Using your "thought process" and justification, if I sign a contract with Exxon to explore for and develop found reserves under my property, then when the tanker trucks start rolling off, I stop them and accuse them of stealing my "assets" and I can be pissed because Exxon sent me a check and introduced me to the "Exxon" lifestyle, freedom, and fancy "hamburgers."

The "oil barons" in those countries control those governments (unless the governments "nationalized" the "assets") and the "holders" and "benefactors" of those "assets" reap the harvest from those "assets" and spend it on their own lifestyles (sending their children to Europe and the U.S. to "enjoy" that awful lifestyle you complain about) and DO NOT SHARE THE WEALTH with the deprived people in those countries ....hoard it for themselves .. and blame the U.S. and those terrible "oil companies" for their poverty.

Just like you do. Look at Israel and "Palestine." You think its over "real estate"? Two people get a piece of land each out of the same tract with the same resources and the same quality. One turns his/hers into a "cash cow" with a palace and the other lives in shack. What does the "guy" in the shack do? Bitch about the way the other one ... _______________ fill in the blanks. When the bitching doesn't work the vandalism and stealing starts.

"Haves" vs. "Have Nots"!

Do you remember Hitler and the Jews? He had to have a "demon"!

It is sad, but our current administration is doing the same thing ...

... even in Ferguson, Missouri. Al Sharpton is his mouth piece.