Tucker Carlson reports

tucker's opinions are not without facts to back them up. the left just doesn't like inconvenient truth and must therefore label it as "false" Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Right don't like them either. Except some of their ilk organize and contribute to violent seditious activities as shown by a conviction this past week.

Right don't like them either. Except some of their ilk organize and contribute to violent seditious activities as shown by a conviction this past week. Originally Posted by Precious_b

you do know that recent stats of Tucker's viewers showed a large minority of viewers of his show are Democrats? the viewership isn't all "right wing" republicans whatever "right wing" even means. that label is the main stream media's attempt to label anything not liberal wokespeak as some evil extremist viewpoint.


so why is a large part of his audience democrats? do they just want to see what Carlson will say next? are they watching to see the "opposition" viewpoint? and why do they keep watching if they don't agree with his views?


i myself find it hilarious when far left liberal news outlets like the HuffPo go ballistic over Carlson's comments. almost as much as when certain posters do in this forum.


bahahahahaaaaaa

you do know that recent stats of Tucker's viewers showed a large minority of viewers of his show are Democrats?
... Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

...
I don't listen/watch any of the above. Originally Posted by Precious_b

Don't pay attention to them either.

Circle of friends for Tucker.

Circle of friends for Tucker. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

millions of them.

https://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/thes...t-2022/513419/


Tucker Carlson Tonight remains the second-most-watched show on cable news. In August, the 8 p.m. opinion news-talk show averaged 3.32 million viewers, up from its July average.


to my delight and your chagrin FOX rules! and has for decades. this is no "ULTRA MAGA phenomenon". FOX has led the cable world for decades, long before Tucker came to FOX or the advent of His Regal Majesty The Lord Donald, Ruler of the Multiverse.


bahahahahaaaa

in other news ..

Of the Following . . .

.

• #6 - Respect the topics presented by those who start a thread. Attempts to derail a thread or change it's direction is referred to as thread hijack and will be discouraged. Attempts to guide a thread in the right direction are appreciated, while responses to posts which hijack a thread are not.

you do know that recent stats of Tucker's viewers showed a large minority of viewers of his show are Democrats? the viewership isn't all "right wing" republicans whatever "right wing" even means. that label is the main stream media's attempt to label anything not liberal wokespeak as some evil extremist viewpoint.


so why is a large part of his audience democrats? do they just want to see what Carlson will say next? are they watching to see the "opposition" viewpoint? and why do they keep watching if they don't agree with his views?


i myself find it hilarious when far left liberal news outlets like the HuffPo go ballistic over Carlson's comments. almost as much as when certain posters do in this forum.


bahahahahaaaaaa Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

So there are fewer than 3.39 (about 1 percent of the US total population) million Republican viewers.

How much influence can a tv show have (a show considered unbelievable by Fox news and a judge)?

The 2nd highest rated news show has an audience of less than 1% of the population and a legal ruling saying reasonable people shouldn't believe what Carlson says.

https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/91774...ay-fox-s-lawye

I don't know or care why anybody, repubs or demos, watches his show since its content can't be trusted. It's just op-ed.
And only @ 1% of the US population watches it.

So there are fewer than 3.39 (about 1 percent of the US total population) million Republican viewers.

How much influence can a tv show have (a show considered unbelievable by Fox news and a judge)?

The 2nd highest rated news show has an audience of less than 1% of the population and a legal ruling saying reasonable people shouldn't believe what Carlson says.

https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/91774...ay-fox-s-lawye

I don't know or care why anybody, repubs or demos, watches his show since its content can't be trusted. It's just op-ed.
And only @ 1% of the US population watches it. Originally Posted by Tigbitties38

so by your own numbers since more people watch conservative news on cable than watch liberal news, conservative news is more important than liberal news.



thank you valued poster.

I've probably said this already in this thread or in a somewhat similar thread - ratings don't mean jack shit as far as validity. I'm a diehard Lakers and Cowboys fan. They get the best ratings although both suck.

I passed a bad car accident yesterday in Dallas. Many were slowing down to look at the wreckage of two mangled cars out of morbid curiosity. Does that mean that wreck was popular, or did it mean that many people are so fucking stupid that they stopped to look and slow down traffic to look at a catastrophic wreck that probably resulted in casualties?

Anyway, there is no correlation between what people will watch as far as credibility. If you believe so, TWK, you've probably watched every episode of The Kardashians, The Bachelor, American Idol, Survivor and plenty of other mindless shit with high ratings. I guess that gives them validity too in your mind. LOL

Edit: Most importantly, if ratings are so important, why is that old orange fat piece of shit not president right now? And please don't bore me with that "stolen election" bullshit reason that his dumb cult believes... Fucker Carlson and Donald Trump are garbage. This country loves watching garbage.

so by your own numbers since more people watch conservative news on cable than watch liberal news, conservative news is more important than liberal news.



thank you valued poster. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

The point is that Carlson has less than 1 percent of the population watching and that he isn't considered to be truthful.

How important can the news be if they have a person that Fox news and our legal system considers untrustworthy? Since it's not trustworthy, it has to be explained. It needs Carlson's perspective to be Carlson's version.
It's not important if it can only "be explained" by the person making it up.

The point is that Carlson has less than 1 percent of the population watching and that he isn't considered to be truthful.

How important can the news be if they have a person that Fox news and our legal system considers untrustworthy? Since it's not trustworthy, it has to be explained. It needs Carlson's perspective to be Carlson's version.
It's not important if it can only "be explained" by the person making it up. Originally Posted by Tigbitties38

the legal system considers untrustworthy? explain.

... Uh... Just WHO claims that Tucker Carlson is NOT truthful?

Liberal news sources that have much lower ratings?? ...

### Salty