A friend pointed me to this thought provoking thread. I must say the varying opinions are quite stringent.
My thoughts: Foremost I would like to point out the word “all” and other such encompassing terms. As in “all” sugar babies are young. “All” sugar babies are exclusive. “No” provider can be a sugar baby. “All” providers and strippers make terrible sugar babies.
Now if the term “all” actually existed easily we could add “all” men want is to fornicate. “All” men will cheat on you. “All” men are stupid.
More clearly it would match: “All” women can have babies. “All” men are dominant. “All” marriages need to be of one man and one woman. “All” black guys are gangsters. “All” Germans hate Jews.
Now one would have to be quite closed minded and judgmental to state the word “all” and not know that there is always variance. There is and always will be the exceptions to the rules. In relationships be they of the quick relief kind or high school lovers marry young, there is always variance. No two relationship is exactly the same.
That being said, looking at the SD/SB side of relationships. Like everything else its subjective. In Iraq a marriage involves one or more women kept in a almost bondage scenario. They would argue that our marriages are not real.
One example of a sugar daddy relationship can be taken from the popularized “pretty woman” where a prostitute became a sugar baby and progressed even further (or so the movie hinted)
From experience I can say I have had sugar daddies some exclusive some not. Some offered monetary assistance that would make someones life more than just comfortable but almost lavish. Others did no more than small gifts and take me grocery shopping once a month. For them I became the girlfriend. No string but rather instead the woman they could call on when they had a bad day. Physical passion that had me washing sheets later. Intellectually stimulating conversations that lasted hours and hours.
One particular sugar daddy started as a client. Instantly we felt that connection when we realized that the “time” had long since expired on our date. Neither of us cared. The connection was made. I found myself missing him when he wasn't around. Not missing his money or gifts but him the person. I have no desire to get married. No interest in more children. Unless I am playing dress up I don't want to do his laundry or dishes. He offered me a trip to cancun and I agreed. Why? Because if I was to go to cancun I would rather go with him then anyone else I know.
Just like all relationships its relative to the parties involved. Circumstances and individuals make their own life and choices. If you never give it a chance then nothing will happen. Excluding one does not in any means exclude you from the exact thing you are trying to avoid.
I know a girl who is not a escort but god help the man if he isn't rich with a loose wallet and well built. I know a escort who will turn down a client if she feels they will not make each other happy.
It is up to the PERSON, to choose if they want to be tainted. It is up to the girl be she professional or not to decide if she wants to be a ATM humper. Just as its up to the Gentleman to choose if he wants to take her to TGIF or to bolings. Its up to the Gentleman to choose if he wants to play in a certain sandbox. It does not make either party wrong or right.
My thoughts on what a sugar daddy sugar baby relationship is?
The gentleman genuinely wants to improve her life.
The young lady wants to enjoy life and explore a unbinding relationship
Together they want all the benefits of having a real intimate and passionate relationship without the flaws, drama, and promises of forever. She makes him her priority (whether she is exclusive or not)
He is honest about what he wants and what he wants to give in return. She makes every effort to fullfill his interests and desires because she WANTS to. Equally the pair work to better each others lives and still enjoy their own freedom.
Always remember. One mans trash is another mans treasure.