A simple poll that any idiot can understand.

Before the election didn’t Biden and Harris publicly state they wouldn’t trust the vaccine?


Isn’t it Biden and Harris who allow hundreds of thousands of unvaccinated migrants into this country every month (200,000+ in November) and ships them thru out the US to spread Covid Originally Posted by tman1847

Just an observation: This is a true statement, not an opinion.

... Kinda hard to have a discussion with LESS people to
discuss-with... Not sure how THAT makes for a good forum.

just sayin'

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

We completely agree on this. To this point, I just received a 5 point hijack infraction for a rather absurd interpretation of the rule. So I am not going to post, period, after today. Not until February 1st. This Forum is losing its appeal in many ways, and excess moderation is part of the problem. No wonder cryptkicker resigned.

We completely agree on this. To this point, I just received a 5 point hijack infraction for a rather absurd interpretation of the rule. So I am not going to post, period, after today. Not until February 1st. This Forum is losing its appeal in many ways, and excess moderation is part of the problem. No wonder cryptkicker resigned. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

What year? Yes, Trump did eliminate needless regulations to speed the process, plus investing dollars to buy vaccines before they received EAU.

My "ignore list" needs to be updated. Some people no longer seem to be with us and some of you (you know who you are) are just not worth engaging. I put these three little polls together to help me evaluate your fitness for being ignored. Simple positions that no one can deny but some of you deny them anyway. You're intractable and stupid to boot. Congratulations! You made the list. Other considerations are how you handle intellectual defeat; do you run away, do you sulk, (or worse) you throw a barbed invective and try to declare victory with your pants around your ankles. That last one puts you on the list.

69in2it69
aloysius.x
Chung Tran
mask69venom
txdot-guy
Yssup Rider
pdidy69
WTF

The ignore has already been put down on you so don't try to contact me. My decision is irrevocable until next year. You shit in your own bed, now you have to sleep in it.

Preemptive strike: This is not about your opinion, this is about how you go about expressing them and your general demeanor. Why have a discussion someone who cannot see reality, nor will accept it when it is 100% proven to them? Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

None of my business Barley. But re-consider txdot. He does make good points for his side and is more moderate than what he posts.

We completely agree on this. To this point, I just received a 5 point hijack infraction for a rather absurd interpretation of the rule. So I am not going to post, period, after today. Not until February 1st. This Forum is losing its appeal in many ways, and excess moderation is part of the problem. No wonder cryptkicker resigned. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

you forgot to end that with

thank you

edit add: IMHO

What year? Yes, Trump did eliminate needless regulations to speed the process, plus investing dollars to buy vaccines before they received EAU. Originally Posted by bambino

yup, and did not want mandates, And was ok with other options

'Exact;y, what contribution does any politician make in the scientific process? None!!!!

'Exact;y, what contribution does any politician make in the scientific process? None!!!! Originally Posted by greenbook

Especially “climate change”.

'Exact;y, what contribution does any politician make in the scientific process? None!!!! Originally Posted by greenbook

Promotion for funding and regulation changes

'Exact;y, what contribution does any politician make in the scientific process? None!!!! Originally Posted by greenbook

funding for one. Did not Dr F pass on US funds to invent China19 ????

funding for one. Did not Dr F pass on US funds to invent China19 ???? Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

He did. But hey, he’s a “scientist” who tortures beagles.

We completely agree on this. To this point, I just received a 5 point hijack infraction for a rather absurd interpretation of the rule. So I am not going to post, period, after today. Not until February 1st. This Forum is losing its appeal in many ways, and excess moderation is part of the problem. No wonder cryptkicker resigned. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

... Surely hope you'll reconsidour about not posting
and perhaps just post observations - dont just go away.
You have some good thoughts on things, Mr. Chung.
Even that we dont agree too often.

Would rather see monitours .. the moderatours get-onto
people for doing mean-spirited insults and name-callings.

That might help improve the conduct 'round here.
And help the threads stay on-point.

just sayin'

### Salty

Hes a one TRICK pony. Till hes embarrassed and pouts in another forum. Originally Posted by winn dixie

Same could be said of a number of our more prolific Trumpists.

But I wouldn’t call them ponies. They’d RTM it. And, based on CTs latest post, did just that.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

We completely agree on this. To this point, I just received a 5 point hijack infraction for a rather absurd interpretation of the rule. So I am not going to post, period, after today. Not until February 1st. This Forum is losing its appeal in many ways, and excess moderation is part of the problem. No wonder cryptkicker resigned. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

Actually, a couple weeks off provides you with an enormous opportunity.


If you can Microsoft Team with several of you BidenBuddies, you have a great opportunity to prove us wrong. Being experts in Bidenism should only take a couple days at most.


I’m open-minded, been waiting, along with many other posters, on Biden accomplishments during the last 11 months. None of you seem to be able to produce one.


"But, but the market’s up" (Wednesday), but down again (Thursday) Does he only get credit when it’s up?


If by chance you struggle, you can review his previous 47 years of living off the taxpayer’s money.


If you know what a “Ben Franklin Balance Sheet” is we could make one up. 2 columns’, one for Biden, one for Trump. 47+ years for Biden, vs. 4 years for Trump, hell it should be a landslide for Biden. I can’t wait to see it.


I can assist with his Senate record: Sponsored 2 Bills, one protecting women, the other children. His famous “Crime Bill” and when his son was stricken with cancer, a bill supporting more cancer research.
Hmm, not much for 47 years. But more than the last 11 months


Well, I’m sure you will set the record straight. You been telling some posters there idiots ever since the election.


NOW IS YOUR CHANCE TO PROVE IT

Rage whining. Expect a lot of it today.

No Hooters is safe!

Thank you for another chance (just one of a seemingly endless list of opportunities) to prove you wrong. And if you're going to assist people, tell the truth.

Biden has sponsored 42 bills that were enacted. McConnell has sponsored 28.
Maybe you should show some proof you're right about the number of bills Biden sponsored. Oh wait, I just proved you (and whoever is included in your "us") wrong.

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/mem...h_biden/300008

Since you did so well on that first section, why would you do better on the second one? Either you don't have a clue (like your total of Biden bills) or you think what has happened in the last 11 months is nothing. Biden has gotten legislation through congress as well as signing executive orders. Don't know what it is? No surprise there.
I'll give you a start so y'all don't look stupid. Try this one.

https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2021...cutive-orders/

Of course this won't stop your claims he hasn't done anything. Just like the AZ audit didn't stop your claims of election fraud.
Trump pencil whipped a bunch of shit and tried to eliminate health insurance for millions of people. What was he going to replace ACA with?
Nothing.
He passed "tax reform" which benefited himself and other very rich people.
Why would I argue with someone who pushes the "big lie"? Why would I argue with someone who makes claims without checking easily accessible information about sponsoring bills?
Didn't Trump have a future felon for his first national security advisor? How many months.....I mean weeks did he last?

Actually, a couple weeks off provides you with an enormous opportunity.


If you can Microsoft Team with several of you BidenBuddies, you have a great opportunity to prove us wrong. Being experts in Bidenism should only take a couple days at most.


I’m open-minded, been waiting, along with many other posters, on Biden accomplishments during the last 11 months. None of you seem to be able to produce one.


"But, but the market’s up" (Wednesday), but down again (Thursday) Does he only get credit when it’s up?


If by chance you struggle, you can review his previous 47 years of living off the taxpayer’s money.


If you know what a “Ben Franklin Balance Sheet” is we could make one up. 2 columns’, one for Biden, one for Trump. 47+ years for Biden, vs. 4 years for Trump, hell it should be a landslide for Biden. I can’t wait to see it.


I can assist with his Senate record: Sponsored 2 Bills, one protecting women, the other children. His famous “Crime Bill” and when his son was stricken with cancer, a bill supporting more cancer research.
Hmm, not much for 47 years. But more than the last 11 months


Well, I’m sure you will set the record straight. You been telling some posters there idiots ever since the election.


NOW IS YOUR CHANCE TO PROVE IT Originally Posted by tman1847