the article fails to state that 2.2 trillion is directly due to the China Syndrome via the CARES act which Trump called wasteful and he was right.You obviously do not understand the difference between debt and deficits.
speaking of promises ...
Obama's Broken Deficit Promise
https://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politic...eficit-promise
6 Times Obama Promised To Cut The Deficit
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article...ut-the-deficit Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
CNN claims 7 WITH 3 Trillion for the China Syndrome. are you smarter than CNN professor poofter?Since when did you ever believe CNN?
"almost 9 trillion" is off by "almost" 2 trillion. is yer math that fuzzy like your logic is? Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
prove he isn't.The Only thing you PROVED is that you are an IDIOT. None of your EXTREMELY biased postings proved anything except that you are brain-washed. PROOF is up to you and you have yet to provide it.
Obama criticises Hispanic voters who picked Trump
https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-55081852
Santorum: Obama exacerbated racism
https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...rbated-racism/
Obama: Ferguson police discrimination ‘oppressive and abusive’
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politic...ing-doj-report
https://theweek.com/articles/462236/...artin-protests
Did the Justice Department incite the 2012 Trayvon Martin protests?
The conservative group Judicial Watch says it has documents proving active involvement by a DOJ civil mediation unit
Investigate Racism in the Obama Justice Department
https://www.nationalreview.com/2010/...ew-c-mccarthy/
Racial animus is not the stuff of policy disagreement, it’s a constitutional travesty.
While commentators have sought to downplay the scandal over DOJ’s dismissal of the New Black Panther party voter-intimidation case, even the liberal media is becoming too embarrassed not to take notice of this injustice. That owes to last week’s explosive testimony by Christopher Coates, a decorated veteran lawyer and supervisor in DOJ’s Civil Rights Division. Defying attorney general Eric Holder — and thus at great professional risk to himself — Coates testified before the Civil Rights Commission last week. It is now abundantly clear why Holder and his minions have been so keen on blocking Coates’s compliance with the commission’s lawful subpoenas.
In hair-raising testimony that named names, Coates described the Obama-Holder Justice Department’s policy of racially biased civil-rights enforcement. In so doing, he corroborated the prior account of his fellow whistleblower, J. Christian Adams, who resigned from the department in order to comply with a commission subpoena. (Holder’s subordinates stopped him from cooperating with the investigation while he was under their thumb.) Both Coates and Adams assert that they came forward because the Obama administration’s policy flagrantly violates civil-rights law and the Constitution. Both also said that public statements and testimony by high-ranking DOJ officials about the Panthers and DOJ policy case have been false.
The department dismissed the Panthers case despite the fact that the government had already won it, due to the defendants’ contemptuous default. The dismissal occurred despite the fact that career prosecutors judged the case to be exceedingly strong. Nevertheless, Holder’s top staffers have maintained for months that the rationale for the dismissal was a good-faith disagreement between low-ranking civil servants (i.e., career prosecutors) about the correct construction of the Voting Rights Act.
To the contrary, it is now clear from the testimony of Coates and Adams, as well as from documents DOJ was compelled to disclose in a lawsuit brought by Judicial Watch, that Obama political appointees were heavily involved in ordering the dismissal and that they were being lobbied by left-wing activist groups. Indeed, Obama political appointee Steven Rosenbaum, the deputy assistant attorney general who is nominally responsible for the decision to dismiss the case, is said to have admitted to Coates that he never even read the case team’s memorandum about the legal and factual support for taking legal action against the Panthers.
A chain of communications finally pried from DOJ by Judicial Watch links Rosenbaum with even higher ranking political appointees. These include deputy associate attorney general Sam Hirsch (a former Obama campaign operative who has pushed for the race-based Balkanization of Hawaii); Thomas Perrelli, the associate attorney general (DOJ’s No. 3 official); and David Ogden, who was deputy attorney general (the No. 2 post at Justice) when the front office, contrary to its repeated claims, was deliberating over the Panthers case. Also almost certainly in the loop is Holder himself. Besides the fact that the Panthers controversy inside his department was something he’d naturally have been interested in and briefed on, the Judicial Watch disclosures indicate that talking points about the Panthers dismissal were prepared for the attorney general at some unspecified point. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
The GOP is so messed up. Controlled by religious zealots and Mr. Trump.So you're admitting that Donald Trump had opinions the opposite of the modern democrat party? So Donald Trump hasn't changed in the last 20 years, the democrat party has changed. No longer democratic but authoritarian with socialist leanings. If that is your party then own it.
Plenty of video interviews from the past when Mr. Trump was pro choice. These days.......he keeps his mouth shut on issues, but finds every way possible to milk more money from his cult. Originally Posted by VitaMan
Since when did you ever believe CNN?
https://www.thebalance.com/trump-pla...l-debt-4114401
Which president increased the national debt most?
Presidents Obama and Trump both increased the debt by nearly $9 trillion during their respective times in office. Trump did this in four years, while Obama did it over eight years. In terms of proportion, Franklin Roosevelt oversaw the largest percentage increase in the national debt during his three-plus terms in office.21 Originally Posted by WTF
The Only thing you PROVED is that you are an IDIOT. None of your EXTREMELY biased postings proved anything except that you are brain-washed. PROOF is up to you and you have yet to provide it. Originally Posted by chefnerd