Long day for Obama

Again I ask the question ...any facts? Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Iva, you mean like the "facts" you and Al Sharpton had "proving" Zimmerman murdered Trayvon Martin?? Those kind of facts?? Well unlike you and Sharpton, we have testimony of members of his unit about what they saw and the note they found after he up and left the camp.

Iva, you mean like the "facts" you and Al Sharpton had "proving" Zimmerman murdered Trayvon Martin?? Those kind of facts?? Well unlike you and Sharpton, we have testimony of members of his unit about what they saw and the note they found after he up and left the camp. Originally Posted by RedLeg505

Red legs your tampon is leaking is why you have red legs. WTF are you babbling about? PMS perhaps.

Red legs your tampon is leaking is why you have red legs. WTF are you babbling about? PMS perhaps. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

You asked for "facts" proving Bergdahl deserted. I know it's tough remembering what you post, that's why I copied your request for facts. I just wanted to know if you wanted the same level of "facts" you and Sharpton had "proving" George Zimmerman committed murder, I.e. none at all. Or.. would eyewitness statements by members of his unit do, since that's more factual evidence than you and Sharpton had when you tried to incite a lynch mob against the "white" hispanic.

Have your meds kicked in yet or are you still unable to remember any further back than about 5 seconds ago??

Typical right wing fucktard response. I ask a legitimate question because of the pentagon statement . Thanks for the threads to news articles , and a hearty fuck you dim wit for the Obie comment. Fucking retard. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Next time before I post articles I'll run them past Jay Carney and Susan Rice. It must be a real burden being a lib these days. Being in a perpetual state of damage control for Obama's numerous screw ups can be quite draining.

You are calling Bergdahl's fellow soldiers "unsubstantiated" rumors? With a record like his we can expect him to run for president in about 30 years as a democrat. Munchie will vote for him as well.
It was you who called him a deserter Munchie. Own it! It looks like you were right while I withheld my comments on that topic.

I notice that you are calling names again rather than coming up with those nebulous facts that you speak of. Where are they?

As for honor, I'm surprised that you get close enough for spell check to spell it for you. You've lied repeatedly on the board, you tried to pass falsehoods off as truth, and you have the nerve to say that someone else has no honor. If we still dueled in this country, you'd be first on the list. Well, maybe second. I 've haven't forgotten you EVA. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

For the uninformed, lib-retarded Odumbo morons who are talking about “unsubstantiated rumors”.

Fellow soldiers call Bowe Bergdahl a deserter, not a hero
By Jake Tapper, CNN
updated 11:39 AM EDT, Tue June 3, 2014

"I was pissed off then, and I am even more so now with everything going on," said former Sgt. Matt Vierkant, a member of Bergdahl's platoon when he went missing on June 30, 2009. "Bowe Bergdahl deserted during a time of war, and his fellow Americans lost their lives searching for him."

Vierkant said Bergdahl needs to not only acknowledge his actions publicly but face a military trial for desertion under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/06/01/us/ber...erter-or-hero/



+1 Originally Posted by I B Hankering

The first 2 uses of the word "unsubstantiated" in this thread come in these 2 posts.

One douche-bag claims someone said it, another douche-bag jumps in and addresses the issue without even checking to see if anyone said it.
This is typical of both of these poser's research. They misunderstand someone's post and it's off to the races.
Both make accusations, false statements, and demand answers to questions that have no bearing on the OP. They try to "refute" other's statements based on their word alone, seldom post links to back up their statements, and both ignore direct questions pertaining to their accusations and questionable replies.
One has no honor. The other less than that.

Slobbrin, your cut and paste is without backup and merit.

You have no credibility.


But you are the front runner for Dipshit of the Year.

So ALL of his army mates are lying???? Are you part of the swift boat refutation patrol? That is what the White House aids are trying to fly.



Munchie and his identical other twin.

Next time before I post articles I'll run them past Jay Carney and Susan Rice. It must be a real burden being a lib these days. Being in a perpetual state of damage control for Obama's numerous screw ups can be quite draining. Originally Posted by cowboy8055

fucking wingers live in a world of their own . If you want to kiss the white house ass before posting it is up to you. Fucking idiot.

You asked for "facts" proving Bergdahl deserted. I know it's tough remembering what you post, that's why I copied your request for facts. I just wanted to know if you wanted the same level of "facts" you and Sharpton had "proving" George Zimmerman committed murder, I.e. none at all. Or.. would eyewitness statements by members of his unit do, since that's more factual evidence than you and Sharpton had when you tried to incite a lynch mob against the "white" hispanic.

Have your meds kicked in yet or are you still unable to remember any further back than about 5 seconds ago?? Originally Posted by RedLeg505

Fucking dimatard I asked about if there was any hard facts about troops being killed in the search for Bergdahl after the pentagon said there hadn't. Take your Sharpton babbling and stick them up your hillbilly ass.

The first 2 uses of the word "unsubstantiated" in this thread come in these 2 posts.

One douche-bag claims someone said it, another douche-bag jumps in and addresses the issue without even checking to see if anyone said it.
This is typical of both of these poser's research. They misunderstand someone's post and it's off to the races.
Both make accusations, false statements, and demand answers to questions that have no bearing on the OP. They try to "refute" other's statements based on their word alone, seldom post links to back up their statements, and both ignore direct questions pertaining to their accusations and questionable replies.
One has no honor. The other less than that. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

You're an equivocating jackass, MasterDickMuncher!

there is no solid information Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Got any hard evidence Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Plus, MasterDickMuncher, the article was cited, and if you need some more, MasterDickMuncher, check cowboy8055's post at #68!

Again I ask the question ...any facts? Originally Posted by i'va biggen

SGT Vierkant's statement meets the definition of "fact", Ekim the Inbred Chimp:

fact : noun : a true piece of information

So ALL of his army mates are lying???? Are you part of the swift boat refutation patrol? That is what the White House aids are trying to fly.



Munchie and his identical other twin. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Did you read my post? Did you understand my post? It was so complicated.

I am saying you are lying. Again.

I showed proof that you did.

The basic jd post has a lie, a mis-representation of fact and an opinion presented as fact statement. To be fair, he mixes things up occasionally, but he always returns to his tried and "true".

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
The first 2 uses of the word "unsubstantiated" in this thread come in these 2 posts.

One douche-bag claims someone said it, another douche-bag jumps in and addresses the issue without even checking to see if anyone said it.
This is typical of both of these poser's research. They misunderstand someone's post and it's off to the races.
Both make accusations, false statements, and demand answers to questions that have no bearing on the OP. They try to "refute" other's statements based on their word alone, seldom post links to back up their statements, and both ignore direct questions pertaining to their accusations and questionable replies.
One has no honor. The other less than that.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

I see you deny none of my post, which you included in your post, or refuted any of it's facts.

Glad you could move on.

I see you deny none of my post, which you included in your post, or refuted any of it's facts.

Glad you could move on. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

It was pointed out to your deflecting ass that you are a liar, MasterDickMuncher -- that refutes your post.

OK, marshmellowman

First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner.

First President to have a social security number from a state he has never lived in.

First President to preside over a cut to the credit-rating of the United States.

First President to violate the War Powers Act.

First President to be held in contempt of court for illegally obstructing oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.

First President to defy a Federal Judge’s court order to cease implementing the Health Care Reform Law.

First President to require all Americans to purchase a product from a third party.

First President to spend a trillion dollars on ‘shovel-ready’ jobs when there was no such thing as ‘shovel-ready’ jobs.

First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn over control of companies to his union supporters.

First President to by-pass Congress and implement the Dream Act through executive fiat.

First President to order a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U.S., including those with criminal convictions.

First President to demand a company hand-over $20 billion to one of his political appointees.

First President to terminate America’s ability to put a man in space-defunded NASA.

First President to have a law signed by an auto-pen without being present.

First President to arbitrarily declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it.

First President to threaten insurance companies if they publicly spoke-out on the reasons for their rate increases.

First President to tell a major manufacturing company (Boeing) in which State they are allowed to locate a factory.

First President to file lawsuits against the states he swore an oath to protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN).

First President to withdraw an existing coal permit that had been properly issued years ago.

First President to fire an inspector general of Ameri-corps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case.

First President to appoint 45 czars to replace elected officials in his office.

First President to golf 73 separate times in his first two and a half years in office, 90 to date & counting (costing taxpayers over $3 million in feb/march of 2014 alone).

First President to hide his medical, educational and travel records.

First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it.

First President to not know how to properly pronounce Navy ‘corpsman’.

First President to go on multiple global ‘apology tours’-including bowing to foreign rulers.

First President to think there are 57 states in America.

First President to go on 17 lavish vacations, including date nights and Wednesday evening White House parties for his friends; paid for by the taxpayer.

First President to say that America was not a Christian nation.

First President to have 22 personal servants (taxpayer funded) just for his wife.

First President to keep a dog trainer on retainer for $102,000 a year at taxpayer expense.

First President to release over 36,000 illegal aliens convicted in nearly 88,000 crimes--including murder and rape. Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

The big font made them truer, right? And what do they have to do with the OP?

Really only looked at a few. They were all like the following example

"Dog trainer" isn't the person's job title or anywhere near his sole duties for that salary. A clear mis-representation of fact. Can you post a link to the video you saw it in?
Just kidding. I wouldn't watch it anyway.

But I don't blame you for that one and the rest even though you cut and pasted them.

Even though you didn't cite a source.

You watch videos and do what you're told.

Douche-bag.

It was pointed out to your deflecting ass that you are a liar, MasterDickMuncher -- that refutes your post. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You included it and deflected it while claiming an opinion statement of mine was a statement of fact. A statement taken out of context.

"Since there is no solid information on his long wait for freedom, freedom he gave up for us, there is something else we should all agree on. Something our Constitution guarantees.
Can anybody who claims our veterans are getting the shit end of the stick guess what that something right wing bloggers have no responsibilities to honor and they would use an American soldier as a club to beat on the President with?
The presumption of innocence."

That was all pure opinion, douche-bag.

Your face is still burning from the repeated bitch-slaps, isn't it?

And now this from the short guy who lives in mommy's basement. You act like mommy's little yap dog that wakes you up 5 times a night to take 2 pisses.
If you ever show some balls and make mommy's dog take a walk in rush hour traffic, let me know.

For now, stop the "yap, yap, yap, yap, yipe!"

You're an equivocating jackass, MasterDickMuncher!



Plus, MasterDickMuncher, the article was cited, and if you need some more, MasterDickMuncher, check cowboy8055's post at #68!

SGT Vierkant's statement meets the definition of "fact", Ekim the Inbred Chimp:

fact : noun : a true piece of information Originally Posted by I B Hankering

If I say you are a cock sucking piece of shit, then that is a fact?