Ukraine m777 howitzers

Why didn't the ancient Chinese invent hang gliders? They had all the right stuff to make huge kites. Even flew a man in a couple of big kites. But no gliders for thousands of years . . .not even a paper airplane . . .and they had paper. Originally Posted by ICU 812

They did, but the evidence has been held by the illuminati... Until one of their dissident members (Orville Wright) used it to develop heavier than air flight as we know it today.

It's just waiting for a Nic Cage movie to be made of the events...

They did, but the evidence has been held by the illuminati... Until one of their dissident members (Orville Wright) used it to develop heavier than air flight as we know it today.

It's just waiting for a Nic Cage movie to be made of the events... Originally Posted by texassapper

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Cg_WPUJdlE


MODERN ARTILLERY IS UKRAINE’S SUPERWEAPON

Still no recommendation for what round to use when calling for fire on Tanks in the open?

Someday you will understand M777 howitzers can destroy tanks. But likely not today. A lot of complaints about your input on this thread.

Someday you will understand M777 howitzers can destroy tanks. But likely not today. A lot of complaints about your input on this thread. Originally Posted by VitaMan

You’re a fraud. Stay in the fraud lane. Even tho there’s a traffic jam there.

Another post by Bambino that has nothing to do with the thread topic.

A serious troll with more than 36,000 posts on this site alone.

Still no recommendation for what round to use when calling for fire on Tanks in the open? Originally Posted by texassapper

rocket assisted rounds are used against tank.. don't know what M-# model round tho.

rocket assisted rounds are used against tank.. don't know what M-# model round tho. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Rocket assisted rounds are used to increase range. They are not anti-tank rounds because there isn't such a thing for indirect artillery. Indirect artillery is used for blanket fire to destroy APC's, soft skinned, vehicles, dismounted infantry, or static positions. They aren't used as anti-armor... that's the entire reason tanks exist... to move through artillery ranges punch holes in front lines and exploit them.

Yes, arty tubes can get lucky and score a direct hit that kills a tank but given a 2 minute time to target (@25 miles) hitting a specific moving target is outside of the current employment of indirect artillery fire.

It's not used taht way and you cannot find ANY FM that will cover such a situation... because THEY AREN'T USED THAT WAY.

Still waiting on vittelman to supply a suggestion for the round when calling for fire.

He won't because he Can't. But we can keep this up for months or years... doesn't bother me.... I'm happy to keep it on the front page forever to illustrate that he doesn't know what he's talking about and can't say he was wrong.

It's hilarious and I enjoy laughing at him.

You're the dipshit everyone is laughing and complaining about.

what round would you load, Gunbunnie?

Several different types of shells have already been discussed, and by people with experience.

You are so invested in your position you can't give it up. Looking like a complete loser.

what round would you load, Redleg?

Haven't you embarrassed yourself enough already ?

Rocket assisted rounds are used to increase range. They are not anti-tank rounds because there isn't such a thing for indirect artillery. Indirect artillery is used for blanket fire to destroy APC's, soft skinned, vehicles, dismounted infantry, or static positions. They aren't used as anti-armor... that's the entire reason tanks exist... to move through artillery ranges punch holes in front lines and exploit them.

Yes, arty tubes can get lucky and score a direct hit that kills a tank but given a 2 minute time to target (@25 miles) hitting a specific moving target is outside of the current employment of indirect artillery fire.

It's not used taht way and you cannot find ANY FM that will cover such a situation... because THEY AREN'T USED THAT WAY.

Still waiting on vittelman to supply a suggestion for the round when calling for fire.

He won't because he Can't. But we can keep this up for months or years... doesn't bother me.... I'm happy to keep it on the front page forever to illustrate that he doesn't know what he's talking about and can't say he was wrong.

It's hilarious and I enjoy laughing at him. Originally Posted by texassapper

not saying you're wrong.



the russians were attempting to cross a river in donbas region, built a pontoon bridge, tanks went over it. arty toasted them.


but it appears that the M982 excalibur round which has a range of 25 miles was used. according to this specs, its a guided round.


if it isn't this round, what were UKR using that toasted those russian tanks.