If you're in complete agreement with me, why would you write: the average woman is not making Oprah money,believe me. That was not a general example. We are talking about women who are still in the middle class tax bracket.I am only commenting on your last few sentences. Marriage isn't or shouldn't be regarded as a form of providing. Marriage is a connection, where the couple cares enough about one another to watch each others back. They share the things they have and contribute to each others lives. Sex is part of it. although it should be fantastic ,it shouldn't define the relationship. Love, companionship and respect are defining factors and should always be checked. These things are important to some people and you'll never find them with a casual encounter with an escort.
Since we were discussing women needing men for money, I inferred from that and your other postings, that unless a woman is independent and/or wealthy, she's with a man for his money. Escorts/GF/Wives are all one in the same. And no, we're not in complete agreement on that.
More of your quotes, so maybe you'll understand where I'm coming from:
Bottom line there is some sexual activity being done for something. That can be sustainability, money, etc,
Married with a Pre-nup. She sucks a dick on holidays and owns, or at least has unlimited access to his assets.
Women are props
Marriage is a form of providing. Just less BJ and wayyyy more of a financial burden. Originally Posted by papadee
Jim