My second no review and why you shouldn't be so quick to judge.

She did not receive the same reception in this rebuttal thread as she did in the last. Must be that damned Houston Effect!

It's been awhile now and I have yet to receive a response to the questions I posed in this thread and no further PMs. I guess she didn't want to have a frank and open discussion after all and isn't truly interested in "making it right". What was the point of this thread then I wonder? Originally Posted by SpiceItUp

That's pretty obvious, isn't it? What was the saying? Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice ....

...or else offer up the butthole. I could live with that....if she also loses the 'tude. Originally Posted by Don T. Lukbak

I'll drink to that...

Pheew! Well, after all of this drama, we have not resolved the situation and probably won't here.

The peculiar thing about humans is that sometimes two people can look at exactly the same situation and yet walk away with totally opposite opinions on what transpired.

Actually, the review was balanced and well-written with both positives and negatives of the session stated.

. . .It is always easier for the reviewer to post a YES review, but it takes more courage to write a NO review because of the repercussions certain to arise. If Christina delivers good service she should just keep on keeping on with her routine, but if that particular session was bad then this NO review is a wake up call to improve in the areas pointed out.

I wonder what the female human saw, that time when the male human left and complained that the bitch refused...

She did not receive the same reception in this rebuttal thread as she did in the last. Must be that damned Houston Effect!

It's been awhile now and I have yet to receive a response to the questions I posed in this thread and no further PMs. I guess she didn't want to have a frank and open discussion after all and isn't truly interested in "making it right". What was the point of this thread then I wonder? Originally Posted by SpiceItUp

I have a couple of questions for you Spicyone: Why didn't you move things along when she was talking for 50 mins or inquire as to why her panties where on? Go along with the bbbj, rules, etc. and then leave without voicing your opinion, etc.?

I understand why you were pissed in the beginning, but it seems to me you are not totally without fault here...she publicly offered to return your entire amount, but you refused instead choosing to keep trashing her in this thread and patting yourself on the back and relishing in the locker room towel pops.

You're a hobby veteran...she's a young 25 year old...who really got the better of whom?

Well, that is still an unresolved question in my mind.

. . . It must all boil down to the different values that people hold, but let's not stray away from the topic just to be a bitch.

I wonder what the female human saw, that time when the male human left and complained that the bitch refused... Originally Posted by Wakeup

$320.00 for a 10 minute blow job............that is so awesome I just want to say it again............and again........and again

The ladies can't read the ROS, yes he gave his side of the story and as I said, I do understand his side, but I get really tired of older members of this board expecting 19 to 25 year olds to act like they are seasoned pros, then coming on here and trashing these YOUNG girls without a second thought or remembrance as to what it was like to be their age. Do I condone a scammer, NO...but she publicly offered to give his money back and he is now acting like his real goal was just to show some devious side of her, when I do not believe that was the case...husband or not.

Listen, I have my share of fans who know that what I post is sincere and not meant in a malicious way, so I can afford to say what's on my mind. I just think you guys don't realize the impact of your words & actions sometimes.


~

[COLOR="Blue"]I have a couple of questions for you Spicyone: Why didn't you move things along when she was talking for 50 mins or inquire as to why her panties where on? Go along with the bbbj, rules, etc. and then leave without voicing your opinion, etc.? Originally Posted by Lexieinhouston

As I wrote in my review, I attempted to several times but was gently but expertly rebuffed and redirected toward conversation. I expected that if she was using up time on the front end she would make up for it on the back-end, that did not happen.

I am a gentleman first and a hobbyist second and so of course I went along with the session according to her wishes, respecting her rules and boundaries as any man should do.

I left without voicing my opinion yes, perhaps I should have been more vocal. What is your point? I'll refer you to my first post in this thread though where I mention that a vast majority of the time customers do not complain to the service provider directly but instead leave unhappy and never return.

[COLOR="Blue"]I understand why you were pissed in the beginning, but it seems to me you are not totally without fault here...she publicly offered to return your entire amount, but you refused instead choosing to keep trashing her in this thread and patting yourself on the back and relishing in the locker room towel pops. Originally Posted by Lexieinhouston

Again, in my review I take the blame for the end result as well. In fact a line from my review reads "Shame on me for allowing her to squander my time in such a way".

As to her offer of a refund, she mentioned this only in this publicity ad here. She has not PMd me regarding it nor did she mention it at the time of the session.

I'm sorry but I must object to your characterization of my responses here as "trashing her". I have done no such thing in fact I have continued to be respectful and complimentary and present only the facts and my observations of them as they occurred. I call it a frank and open discussion, started by her by the way, it seems that anything negative in any way about a provider strikes you as "trashing" them.

You're a hobby veteran...she's a young 25 year old...who really got the better of whom? Originally Posted by Lexieinhouston

Once again, I admit this in my review. Shame on me for allowing her to squander my time in such a way. It is clear who got the better of whom. My hat's off to her. But the no review was deserved.

I'm confused, how is what they're saying impacting her? Except for the better?

^^^ Not as clueless as she wants everyone to believe.

She did not receive the same reception in this rebuttal thread as she did in the last. Must be that damned Houston Effect!

It's been awhile now and I have yet to receive a response to the questions I posed in this thread and no further PMs. I guess she didn't want to have a frank and open discussion after all and isn't truly interested in "making it right". What was the point of this thread then I wonder? Originally Posted by SpiceItUp

You may not see this as trashing, but I do; you told your side, yet returned to gloat with the "Houston Effect!"

When all is said and done, the no review is going to have a much higher impact on YOU than her and I'm not talking about your ATF's and current fans.


~

^^^ Not as clueless as she wants everyone to believe. Originally Posted by Lexieinhouston

I'm not clueless at all. I was asking you what's your reasoning behind saying that.. Because its obviously not "common knowledge".

It is irrelevant that you think he's slamming her.. First off he's not, but even if he was, such is life. People and their delicate bullshit sensibilities can't take criticism for what its worth. If it's true, its not slamming.

Its his review, he didn't slam her (we've seen slamming and that wasn't it.) so what is he doing wrong in your eyes? Stating fact?

Oh and PS most of the chicks running around talking about oh he's on my DNS list or I don't like the way he posts so on a "no see" list are usually the ones that don't have to worry about it because nobody's knocking down their door anyhow. Just throwing that in there.

You may not see this as trashing, but I do; you told your side, yet returned to gloat with the "Houston Effect!"

When all is said and done, the no review is going to have a much higher impact on YOU than her and I'm not talking about your ATF's and current fans.


~ Originally Posted by Lexieinhouston

I never trashed her nor will I. I would have simply written my review and let it fade off into the ether were it not for her starting this thread. The idea that I will be negatively impacted by a negative review I wrote is ludicrous. There are a great number of truly excellent providers who are unconcerned with what other ladies are doing and are only concerned with their own business. You and I both know that the vast majority of ladies never look at these forums, and were they to look they would find me being courteous and respectful as I have continued to be.


My comment about the Houston Effect was not gloating it was directed at my fellow inmates in the asylum and their reception of this thread in comparison to a similar one in Dallas. Though I do not understand why she has not returned to discuss if that was her intent.

My goal was free exchange of information, which is the whole the purpose of reviews, not to negatively impact her business. I wish her well and have no doubt that as many men will be drawn to her by the things mentioned in my review as were turned off by it. Which, by the way, I also said in my review and in the public commentary.