Wow, it isn't often that someone responds to one of my posts with such an easy put away shot.
First, you have taken the discussion away from a business model or style and placed it in the more freighted context of gender. Second, you acknowledge, backed by an impeccable source (lol - the Huffington Post), that women don't like to negotiate.
Yet, despite this clear dislike of negotiation you feel that it is okay for you engage in unwanted behavior? Going back to the gender issue, is it because you are a guy who isn't a "pin cushion, subject to her every will?" What other excuse could you have for ignoring the preferences of women?
I am having a hard time seeing how that isn't disrespectful. Again, Is it because you are a "guy" and therefore superior? And if it isn't disrespectful to ignore a lady's wishes, sometimes clearly stated that her rates are non-negotiable, it isn't a far step to say that there is no disrespect in ignoring her wishes about bedroom activities. Sure, she says no CIM, but I'm no pin cushion and I'm going to push that envelope.
I know that not everyone feels this way, but for me a session with a GFE provider is a two way event and a shared chemistry is essential for me to get the most out of the event. That chemistry is far easier to achieve when the provider enters the session feeling that she is respected and that her boundaries, of all sorts, will be honored. Do you think that you can develop that essential chemistry if the lady thinks you are a grifter looking for a better deal or to win the "haggle?" She may relent and see you but you will get lesser service, so your skills at negotiation get you naught.
Yes, Sketchball82, you are indeed special.
Originally Posted by awl4knot
1. There are gender issues in play, like it or not. Providers tend to be women. Hobbyists tend to be men. I don't think that is reasonably disputable.
2. You are correct, I used Huntington Post as a reference because I didn't expect you to call it into credibility. I do not know who is a scholar and frankly Huntington Post is an easier read than a proper peer-reviewed journal. That does not mean its the only source. Along those lines, here are several credible peer-reviewed articles that conclude similar findings from NIH, Harvard, and Berkeley.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20085399
http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/5207.html
http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/faculty...ompson_ROB.pdf
3. My pin cushion comment was a rebuttal to your logic. You effectively state that you don't negotiate because it's what providers want. I have no problem if you don't wish to negotiate, but that is your choice. I fail to see how this creates a logical imperative, morality-based issue, or ethical issue that relates to me and my hobbying. I chose colorful language to emphasize that it was your choice not to negotiate, which shouldn't affect my choices when I hobby. I did not intend to attack you. I apologize if that's how it read. To the contrary, I respect your opinion and enjoy your posts.
4. "I know that not everyone feels this way, but for me a session with a GFE provider is a two way event and a shared chemistry is essential for me to get the most out of the event. That chemistry is far easier to achieve when the provider enters the session feeling that she is respected and that her boundaries, of all sorts, will be honored. Do you think that you can develop that essential chemistry if the lady thinks you are a grifter looking for a better deal or to win the "haggle?" She may relent and see you but you will get lesser service, so your skills at negotiation get you naught."
- This is well said, and I agree. It is quite possible that she chooses to give me inferior service. Obviously I hope this isn't the case, but if it is then I'm in a position to decide if it was worthy of a repeat, if we should again negoitate, or if I should even give her more money and spend more time with her too. (Yes, I often do this with excellent tips and gifts if my new friend convinces me that she is worth it.)
5. "Yes, Sketchball82, you are indeed special." No need for cheap shots. I think we're better than that.