This particular girl was very honest with me and we hit it off so great that she would mope and complain if I did not see her often enough.
I do not doubt her word as she shared a lot of intimate details of her life. I told her not to tell me if the question bothered her.
Honestly, I was taken aback when she casually mentioned that the highest number of guys she had seen was 18 in one night, but she said she would average about 6 or 7 a night.
. . .However, you might note that there was a recent story on NPR about human trafficking and one girl who was interviewed for the program said that sometimes she did 60 customers in 1 day.
Originally Posted by Fast Gunn
I can actually believe your friend said that, but the arithmetic is the arithmetic. 12 x 60 /18 = 40 minutes. That doesn’t allow any time for a meal, a bathroom break, and almost no time to even run a brush through her hair. Assume a smoke break, a fast food lunch, a couple drinks of water, and pretty quickly you are down to 5 min between guys.
So that means either:
--She is mistaken on the head count
Or
--She is a seriously mass production lady
My guess would be the former, but I don’t actually know, do I? Either way, I do not believe for a moment that 18 in an evening is remotely representative.
As to the 60 in a day, again, let’s do the math. Math is your friend. 24 x 60 /60 means one every 24 minutes. One guy is standing there dropping his pants while the other guy is pulling up his—and that is with zero sleep, zero meals, zero washing, zero anything else. Yes, physically it can happen, but that hardly allows for anything other than chained to the bed with a chamber pot and a line waiting at the door. Could it happen? Sure, it is physically possible—and actual traffickers would have no regard for her comfort, etc., but even they are unlikely to do that. Imagine what the word of mouth reviews the 57th guy would be passing to other potential clients? No, I suspect a lady who told that to a reporter said so because she lost count (in that situation 6 guys could seem like 60). Or more likely thought the reporter wanted to hear sensational numbers.