well then, name those guys so we can either confirm or disprove your assumption.
as well as pay or collect on your last bet.
this is not much diff than a client commenting about some "bad" treatment they received but not telling who the provider is.
Originally Posted by pmdelites
There is no assumption for you to confirm or approve and those two types are totally different, so bad examples on your part.
A provider who treats a hobbyist bad, but that hobbyist does not review her or starts a thread about what he perceives as mistreatment by her and does not name her is a waste of a thread in the fact that the provider may have good reviews or no one has ever heard of her and in order to do a proper info exchange on her, guys need to know who she is to avoid her.
Guys that have not posted a review in over 6 months, yet post multiple times a day on a review board, with the majority of those posts, negative and condescending are pretty clear without naming names. But, most of the names go without saying, all you have to do is look at the guys who have the shit ass and thread hijacking comments to take personal shots at others, look at their post history of the same types of negative remarks and comment on how reviews should be or tell others of their experience with a provider, and yet there are no reviews of that provider by that person, nor are there any recent reviews at all, yet they post multiple times a day, with nothing good to say about anyone or anything, aka a troll. Do you really need names to figure that out?