So if White or dark knight gave reviewed part of the review twisting op wording in review to make him bad in eyes of reviewed. Then op gave reviewed the ROS too defend self he is in violation of the guidelines. errr opsEveryone here has the potential for critical thinking. Personally, I would expect the reviewed provider to ask the reviewer why the contents that have been sent to her were different than the contents he sent her.
what would be the points for this crime?
dang and she like the ROS after reading ahhhh errrrrr as I hear Originally Posted by offshoredrilling
Then the reviewer would note the discrepancies. Then the reviewer or provider would report said third party for not only linking ROS, but also for malicious action.
I suspect that's why armature is in trouble right now.