If you had the option would you bareback FS a provider?

im not taking any sides here, but im legit curious ......
it just seems confusing to me when people say they are the same thing because one is penetration and the other is not. Originally Posted by Ballistixz

Personally I think there is a big difference between the 2. Just my opinion though. Originally Posted by Bassangler

So you two are thinking only on a technical level and obviously correct.

The point you are missing is the one suggested by others (including me) that bare SS, bare Italian, and bare intercourse have very similar safety/risk levels. Similar risk levels because of the similar level of skin-to-skin exposure and marginally different bodily fluid exchange even if the male doesn't ejaculate.

IMO, anyone who disagrees with the risk levels I've suggested is a fool.

It's up to each person to decide on their own what risk level they can assume.

But extrapolating one step further, some have suggested (including me) that if two partners are going to engage in bbss, they just as well go ahead and allow the penetration,....and go ahead and admit to it.

I'm not disagreeing with you, but covered SS just doesn't seem fun at all.

And some will suggest the same comment for CFS.

Just read the reviews from all the sad tricks that can't finish in the party hat.

So you two are thinking only on a technical level and obviously correct. Originally Posted by GlobeSpotter

The jury had spoken !
Dumb Whores don't know the difference
and they think anyone that participated in this thread is a Habitual Raw Riders.
Braincells are a rare commodity with Hookers that should have smart pimps to guide them.

Personally I would put more thought into DATY than i would SS. Whether she practices covered or not. There was still a pair of sweaty balls swinging against there fairly recently.

.....
Braincells are a rare commodity with Hookers that should have smart pimps to guide them. Originally Posted by A1vapor

You resemble that remark.

Thanks for the compliment, Pimps serve their purpose.

Where is AL Bundy when you need him?? LOL

M.M.

Bliss whores are codependent on their cheap white knights, that we agree on.

Lets all Seek-(P)eace
On this thread.
I'm not ashamed. I loveeee SS. And proud of it. It's best when you get it with a Nuru massage. Slippery Fun.

Slip in slide alllll on that D like a waterpark ride with no rails lol

That sounds like fun!!!

Lets all Seek-(P)eace
On this thread.
I'm not ashamed. I loveeee SS. And proud of it. It's best when you get it with a Nuru massage. Slippery Fun.

Slip in slide alllll on that D like a waterpark ride with no rails lol Originally Posted by Lia88

More business for you with that beautiful personality.

So you two are thinking only on a technical level and obviously correct.

The point you are missing is the one suggested by others (including me) that bare SS, bare Italian, and bare intercourse have very similar safety/risk levels. Similar risk levels because of the similar level of skin-to-skin exposure and marginally different bodily fluid exchange even if the male doesn't ejaculate.

IMO, anyone who disagrees with the risk levels I've suggested is a fool.

It's up to each person to decide on their own what risk level they can assume.

But extrapolating one step further, some have suggested (including me) that if two partners are going to engage in bbss, they just as well go ahead and allow the penetration,....and go ahead and admit to it. Originally Posted by GlobeSpotter

Key word i noticed there is risk level. condoms still have very real risks, but it is the lowest risk level. going full on raw being the highest risk level. BBBJ has risk, but its still a very low risk. the same is true for bare SS. so i dont think its fair to say that bare SS has the same risk level as raw penetration. the risks levels are not the same there. you are going from a low risk level to a very high risk level.

...... so i dont think its fair to say that bare SS has the same risk level as raw penetration. the risks levels are not the same there.
.... Originally Posted by Ballistixz

Of course, they're not exactly the same.

.....you are going from a low risk level to a very high risk level. Originally Posted by Ballistixz

Now you're thincking like an idiot.

Of course, they not exactly the same.

Now you're thinking like an idiot. Originally Posted by GlobeSpotter

If you dont like it. It's cool. Relaaaax . chiiilll. Dont spoil the fun. More fun for everyone else. It's not everyone's cup of tea. But it's mines and I like it straight up. No cream or sugar lol