Just do it.

You need to read LL's post again for better comprehension, i.e., "the technical meaning is nothing more than an 'indictment' based on specific ALLEGATIONS." LL and I are saying the same thing: Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator was impeached. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

MTP is "playing word games"!

It's the same bullshit you see on here and elsewhere in which bullshitters with the "slight of tongue" drop the "illegal" off the phrase "illegal aliens" and try to turn it around to accuse the poster/speaker of being AGAIN IMMIGRATION and a RACIST who opposes "aliens" coming to this country.

That's all they have is FAKE NEWS BULLSHIT.

Is that also like the news stories about white people wearing blackmen masks when the shoot other people??? I believe so.

It's a fatal flaw with Liberals. The believe they are smarter!

You need to read LL's post again for better comprehension, i.e., "the technical meaning is nothing more than an 'indictment' based on specific ALLEGATIONS." LL and I are saying the same thing: Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator was impeached.




Andrew Johnson was a Democrat impeached by that asshole from Massachusetts, Benjamin "Spoons" Butler -- who happened to be Lincoln's 2nd choice for VP -- and the man passed over for higher office when Lincoln picked Johnson. Do you imagine Butler's animus towards Johnson might have been more personal than modern revisionist historians would have you believe? Originally Posted by I B Hankering

LOL! I was pointing out how you were playing the word game as if he was charged with the impeachment. You should be ashamed. Then of course you bring up Johnson. He was also found not guilty. The only reason Nixon was not impeached is he made a deal with them and stepped down, so one could say he was impeached, kinda like the way you manipulated my words to say coined LOL!

I think it's pretty sad that the actions of a misguided twit are entertained to this extent.


Jim

No. Johnson was a Democrat: Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Actually he was on the National Union Party ticket with Lincoln at the time of his election. The REP/DEM label of today is completely different than back then. Therefore your assertion has no merit.

I think it's pretty sad that the actions of a misguided twit are entertained to this extent.


Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

You should retract this comment about IB before Wakeup gets wind of it.

LOL! I was pointing out how you were playing the word game as if he was charged with the impeachment. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

One is not "charged WITH the impeachment"!

One is charged BY the impeachment. And the U.S. Constitutions identifies the offenses for which a President may be "impeached" or CHARGED AS IS MORE APPROPRIATE so as not to confuse others.

Since the Anti/Never Trumpers want to ignore the "will of the People" in 2016 and are seeking to "remove" Trump from office by any means, even suggesting violence, they are setting a dangerous precedent by doing so, which they have done in the past and whined and blubbered when they got it handed back to them.

As the old saying goes:

"The shoe is on the other foot soon enough!"

And if they aren't prudent in their tactics they may just be morphed into Anti/Never Pencers beginning in 2024 through 2032. You want Pence in 2024 and 2028? All this "impeachment" jabber is not well received by the rank and file voters.

I think it's pretty sad that the actions of a misguided twit are entertained to this extent.


Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

Are you talking about the President or a fellow poster?

One is not "charged WITH the impeachment"!

One is charged BY the impeachment. And the U.S. Constitutions identifies the offenses for which a President may be "impeached" or CHARGED AS IS MORE APPROPRIATE so as not to confuse others.

Since the Anti/Never Trumpers want to ignore the "will of the People" in 2016 and are seeking to "remove" Trump from office by any means, even suggesting violence, they are setting a dangerous precedent by doing so, which they have done in the past and whined and blubbered when they got it handed back to them.

As the old saying goes:

"The shoe is on the other foot soon enough!" Originally Posted by LexusLover

The "will of the people" was different than the outcome of the election, LL. According to polls, that hasn't changed.

But I'm sure there's some kind of word game you can play that will spin it otherwise.

The REP/DEM label of today is completely different than back then. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

Yea. The KKK were Democrats.

The Democrats keep trying to "rebrand" themselves after they get their identity tarnished from it being revealed (the sheets and hoods removed), just like today ... trying to be "socialists" while at the same time pretending to be economically responsible and pro-military.

Sometimes that's challenging: for instance being "pro-abortion" while trying to hustle the Hispanic-Catholic voters or being opposed to trade restrictions on good manufactured outside of this country while romancing the unions-workers in this country! Identity politics is a thinly sliced game ... and usually backfires due to the inconsistencies when the onion starts getting peeled.

You should retract this comment about IB before Wakeup gets wind of it. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

I wasn't referring to IB. Go cause trouble somewhere else.


Jim

I wasn't referring to IB. Go TRY TO cause trouble somewhere else.


Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

FIFY

It's a joke by Larry Elder. Do you really find it sad someone would burn their worn out Nikes rather than perhaps insult a vet by giving them to him? Sounds like bad virtue signaling to me. Originally Posted by gnadfly

Nice try. It don't take but a few minutes to do a search and realize that not all the Nike gear is worn out. They are just butt-hurt and looking for attention by posting videos on the internet when they can donate their Nike stuff. I'm willing to bet any homeless person would be more than happy to get some Nike gear.

The NFL is in the process of removing that little Nike swoosh from the uniforms.


Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

I doubt that. The NFL just signed an 8 year deal with Nike.

I doubt that. The NFL just signed an 8 year deal with Nike. Originally Posted by PrettyBoyG

Have you read the "contract"?

Actually, since Trump won 30 states (that's 60%,in other words a supermajority) the will of the people was carried out as Trump won the election. His support among blacks and Hispanics has more than doubled. That's not spin, that's FACT. If you can't handle it, that's on you.