Stopping the Caravan

Even if mexico takes 1/2 of them, that still leaves 4k or so we have to deal with.





BUT Liberals are not the ones WELCOMING these illegals, into their OWN homes! To me that's rather telling. Originally Posted by garhkal

A few things.

I didn't invite them, why would I ask them to stay in my house?
You people keep saying liberal or democrats are behind them coming here. Because you heard a rumor on the internet. But you all know why they left where they were at. Because where they were at sucks. No one should be offering free entry. But we do have asylum programs.

Under current law, they can apply for asylum. If you don't like current law, why didn't trump get legislation started? That's how you change laws. Have you all forgotten he has a majority in congress? Where is immigration reform? Healthcare reform?
This is clearly a republican issue. He sure managed to get his shit together to cut his and his butt boy's taxes.

If the fat lazy slob you all idolize would do his fucking job, this wouldn't be an issue. You might expect and except his level of presidential inactivity but I don't. He comes out and says, "Look at all the stuff I've done." Get up, watch fox for a couple of 3 hours, play golf, eat a couple of quarter pounders, go to bed by 11; repeat.

All he's done is tear shit apart. He can't build consensus but he can sure build walls. Oh that's right. He can't do physical walls. The only walls he has built have been inside our country. He has taken science from the scientists and given it to douche-bags like scott pruitt.

He told you he wouldn't have time for vacations. No time to play golf. He doesn't take a salary because his tax cut gives him a shitload more than a lousy 400k. He said he was going to release his tax returns.

Then I watched a bunch of you try to explain why he lies all the time. Why he needs to lie so frequently. Why it doesn't matter. That's another simple answer. He lies because he's a liar. He always has been.

And he's lowered the bar on American ideals and values. He's trying and succeeding at numbing the public to his transgressions. No one is perfect but he is a long way from that. He's a self-serving bastard. His own cabinet has called him a fucking moron.
You don't think they're smarter than you?

Oh, that's right. You don't.

So since you missed it, my argument was even though the forum is more civil, it still isn't honest.

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Imho, you can not have one without the other.

Lies are not civil...so what we still have is a forum chocked full of lies parading is civil. As long as lies and idiotic statements are not borne the consequence they deserve this forum will be far from civil.

Be like a civil thief. That seems like an oxymoron.

Be like a nice polite hooker taking your money and not performing a service. wtf?

I could go on and on. Lol

Who here has changed his or her mind because of a thread posted in this forum?

What would it take to get people to change their minds about demonizing legal legitimate asylum seekers?

Who here has changed his or her mind because of a thread posted in this forum?

What would it take to get people to change their minds about demonizing legal legitimate asylum seekers? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Did you mean?
"demonizing illlegal illlegitimate asylum seekers?"

just curious?


.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

Iffy...

Who here has changed his or her mind because of a thread posted in this forum?

What would it take to get people to change their minds about demonizing legal legitimate asylum seekers? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

I've actually changed my mind before due to posts here. Sometimes I get too liberal and some of the other posters point out my faults.

We are not demonizing the people in the caravan who are just honest working people. I would say that day to day, the millions of illegal aliens working in the United States are treated better by the public than their exploitative employers.(although some likely treat them well, too) However, we already have enough poor people, and whoever is in the caravan and is a good person may accidentally be providing cover for another person in the caravan who is either an economic refugee, which I suspect most are, or a morally neutral person who will opportunistically commit crimes when he sees the opportunity.

To the extent women and their dependents are in the caravan, they are welcome to have temporary shelter in the US while their men go back to their country and fight the bad guys.

We are not demonizing the people in the caravan who are just honest working people. Originally Posted by friendly fred

Who is going to sort them out? And where? And when?

The "honest working people" present themselves at the appropriate U.S. State Department facility to make an appointment and obtain the appropriate paper work to apply for entrance into the U.S. like the others were required to do before them. I recognize that it is a "process," which is often referred to in this country as "due process." I also realize that the people who facilitate their invasion of the U.S. (and Mexico on the way!) are many of the same people who have been plotting to overthrow the current administration by any legal and/or nonlegal means they can ... and their attitude is "Fuck the U.S. Constitution and Amendments!"



The above "behavior" is acceptable to the Liberals. So is invading countries apparently ... so long as it provides them some additional votes for the upcoming elections ... even if the voters are illegal! Since the burning at Berkeley is "ACCEPTABLE" in America the invaders should feel "right at home"!

Who here has changed his or her mind because of a thread posted in this forum?

What would it take to get people to change their minds about demonizing legal legitimate asylum seekers? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

the fact that theres a crime wave in their countries is not a good reason to grant them legal asylum.

they could have filed for asylum at the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate in those countreis, but they didn't.


the trip they made was totally unnecessary.

the fact that theres a crime wave in their countries is not a good reason to grant them legal asylum.


they could have filed for asylum at the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate in those countreis, but they didn't. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Could it be because they are part of the "crime wave"?

Importation of Blue Wave - Crime Wave!!!!!

Could it be because they are part of the "crime wave"?

Importation of Blue Wave - Crime Wave!!!!! Originally Posted by LexusLover

could be.



alot of them are males. looks like maybe 80%. if we take for granted that maybe half of the males are "good" people and half are ciminals and potential criminals..

could be.



alot of them are males. looks like maybe 80%. if we take for granted that maybe half of the males are "good" people and half are ciminals and potential criminals.. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

LOOKS LIKE 80%????

Holy chit, that IS “alot!”

Trump himself admitted he had no idea who was in the caravan.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/01/polit...van/index.html

But you do????

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

I like seeing soldiers adding barb/razor wire in certain locations. I think that's much more cost effective than a wall.

I also don't see an issue with the military helping to secure the border. I know they are technically banned from acting as a police force domestically. However, if protecting the borders doesn't fall under national security, I'm not sure what does.

I'm not sure what they are and aren't allowed to do.

Perhaps let ICE & border patrol handle those that do make it through, but let the army stop the bulk of it at the river?


Other countries use military at the borders,no?

Do you believe invasion is imminent?

A few things.

I didn't invite them, why would I ask them to stay in my house? Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Well since liberals are the ones saying "WELCOME THEM IN, OPEN THE BORDER UP"< then to ME, its on YOU TO FUND/be responsible for them. So start doing so by opening up YOUR OWN HOUSES..

the fact that theres a crime wave in their countries is not a good reason to grant them legal asylum.

they could have filed for asylum at the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate in those countreis, but they didn't. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

OR as i've repeatedly mentioned, GONE SOUTHWARD to much nearer 'safe countries' like Brazil, Costa Rica and Panama.

OR as i've repeatedly mentioned, GONE SOUTHWARD to much nearer 'safe countries' like Brazil, Costa Rica and Panama. Originally Posted by garhkal

As the crow flies, garhkal:

The shortest distance from Guatemala to Brazil is 3,334 miles
Distance from Guatemala to the US is 1,505 miles.

Distance from Guatemala City to San Jose Costa Rica is about half as far as to the US Border.

The distance from Guatemala City to Panama City is almost 1900km. To the US, it's 2,422.


You think its about distance? Please try to put things in the proper perspective, then.




And who opened their home to you when you came here?

Same people who opened their homes to me.

NOBODY! Our country provides opportunity. Not home hospitality. My forbears did just fine as immigrants.

Jeez.