This article?
https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/17/...reliable-data/
He even states in the beginning...
Which pretty much mirrors my disclaimer that we need more information.
I also stated in another response nearly 2 weeks ago we don't fully know because we are behind on testing...
https://eccie.net/showthread.php?p=1061990314
My calcs are based on current known data, which probably will deviate somewhat, as we go along and test more people, and resolutions occur (recovery or death), but that 17-20% has to make one take a little pause and not dismiss this yet. To make any final conclusions on this is very premature still.
By the way, I just learned I have a close family member in NY who may have been infected (getting tested tomorrow), so I'm definitely rooting for the mortality rate to decrease and treatments to become more readily available, so we can all get back to somewhat "normal" sooner. Originally Posted by SecretE
I do agree we have not enough data. The thrust of the article is to consider the undiagnosed asymptomatic and minimally symptomatic infected - which adds a huge number to the total in figuring out the case mortality rate.
We do not have that number - but it is very likely less than 1% case mortality rate for Wuhan corona virus.
And less than that of the Influenza A virus.
You have my prayers for your family member!!