How is this any better than bbfs?

With all that goopy sliding oil, I would surmise that it's hard for any bodily fluids to maintain enough purity to be effective, in terms of possible infection or impregnation.

Just my assertion. Could be wrong.

Looks fun. Let's try it, London. Originally Posted by Rambro Creed

Yeah, I tried introducing that notion.

I ALWAYS wear a thong when I get a nuru massage/slide.

I ALWAYS wear a thong when I get a nuru massage/slide. Originally Posted by notanewbie

and oh what a visual that is.

OK so I'll play devils advocate here for a minute. Exactly how is cum around (not in) the pussy so much worse and different than cum on your hands, chest, face, ass, mouth, whatever? If the standard is now simple skin contact with semen we might as well all just quit now and watch this industry dry up and blow away.

I have never done this nuru stuff but it does look fun. Plus the video linked is much different than others I have seen. This one is more porn rather than massage oriented. Originally Posted by Chica Chaser

Chica, I'm pretty sure if you/someone came on my forehead I wouldn't catch an STD. There's a big difference LOL!

Seems "skin to skin" contact has been mentioned more than once in this thread as a possible mode of STD exposure. As I was watching the video I noticed that this Nuru Message Gel has an interesting consistancy. This stuff seems to be not only extremely slippery but rather thick. Being that both bodies become rather coated with this stuff could that act as a barrier minimizing direct skin to skin contact. Sort of like the piston in an engine the thin film of oil coating the piston and cylinder wall the metals never actually come in contact with eachother. I am just saying. Originally Posted by acp5762

Forgive me but this is ridiculous. Exactly how is the gel supposed to prevent STDs? Unless it says that on the NURU gel bottle then that theory is BS. The best way for one to stay protected is to wear something that will block the penis from entering the vagina or................not do the NURU at all. And from what I have gathered even if a thong/underwear was worn during the massage, there is no 100% way to gurantee that one won't contract Genital warts/HPV, Crabs (public lice). In other words, I agree with another poster, it carries the same risk as a bbbj BUT for the ladies that do do this, I would wear a thong or something to block penetration which could lead to even bigger disasters - HIV comes to mind.

Chica, I'm pretty sure if you/someone came on my forehead I wouldn't catch an STD. There's a big difference LOL!




Forgive me but this is ridiculous. Exactly how is the gel supposed to prevent STDs? Unless it says that on the NURU gel bottle then that theory is BS. The best way for one to stay protected is to wear something that will block the penis from entering the vagina or................not do the NURU at all. And from what I have gathered even if a thong/underwear was worn during the massage, there is no 100% way to gurantee that one won't contract Genital warts/HPV, Crabs (public lice). In other words, I agree with another poster, it carries the same risk as a bbbj BUT for the ladies that do do this, I would wear a thong or something to block penetration which could lead to even bigger disasters - HIV comes to mind. Originally Posted by Naomi4u

Well I was just making a statement. I never stated that Nuru Gel would indeed prevent or hinder any STD exposure. But I'll conclude my contribution to this thread by saying The Nuru Message is something you and a few others are oppose to because of the obvious exposure to STD's from performing it. So just stick to good old American " Man on Top Get It Over With Quick" form of sex.

Well I was just making a statement. I never stated that Nuru Gel would indeed prevent or hinder any STD exposure. But I'll conclude my contribution to this thread by saying The Nuru Message is something you and a few others are oppose to because of the obvious exposure to STD's from performing it. So just stick to conventional American " Man on Top Get It Over With Quick" form of sex. Originally Posted by acp5762

That is where you are wrong. I never opposed anything. I am looking at it from both sides. London started this thread because I expressed my interest in it and she said it's a bad idea and now I see that - It is.

That is where you are wrong. I never opposed anything. I am looking at it from both sides. London started this thread because I expressed my interest in it and she said it's a bad idea and now I see that - It is. Originally Posted by Naomi4u

DAMN IT!!!

DAMN IT!!! Originally Posted by Ed Highlight

Originally Posted by notanewbie
I ALWAYS wear a thong when I get a nuru massage/slide.

and oh what a visual that is. Originally Posted by Ansley

GAH! I need a brain refresh!

That is where you are wrong. I never opposed anything. I am looking at it from both sides. London started this thread because I expressed my interest in it and she said it's a bad idea and now I see that - It is. Originally Posted by Naomi4u

Well I appreciate your opinions and everyone elses. I am sure you feel the same. It was an interesting thread. We are all looking for ways to implement saftey without compromising pleasure.

Let's do this!

Better safe than sorry.

Not sure if this was already addressed but... i know many girls who got preg without penetration. i also know of a few that purposely try to get prego because some guys find that attractive and pay more....

Some of you may be fixed... but if a provider were to end up prego.. and seeing so many different men... it would be like a Maury Show... you may be fixed... but try explaining to the SO why you still have to present proof...

Personally, even despite myself being fixed, I dont see it worth the risk of any std.

Actually, a monkey could make his mind up after watching that video. It's pretty hard to speculate when you see the evidence right in front of you....an entire "load" of evidence lol. What I did not know and still don't, is if that video represents how it's commonly done in the business.

If cum is literally sprayed all over the vagina even without the pee pee going in, how is putting it in without shooting any worse? Oh, that's right....it's worse for the GUY. I would rather have a bare member inside me where the guy pulls out to nut, vs. having a load of cum inside me! Duh! Originally Posted by London Rayne

My point is that you are not the expert. Thank you for calling yourself a monkey. Stops me from having to.

Let's do this!

Better safe than sorry. Originally Posted by notanewbie

Ha,Ha, Well maybe it's all coming down to this. This post reminds me of this old song.

http://youtu.be/1FgSmdfRUus

My point is that you are not the expert. Thank you for calling yourself a monkey. Stops me from having to. Originally Posted by OneInAMillion

I may not be an expert in Nuru Massage, but common sense is not a far stretch for me. Add to that I spent 7 years in school for Health Care Mgmt. in which we did have to take course after course on bs that had nothing to do with Admin. If you are all for this type of risk, more power to ya, but ignoring the FACTS is pretty lame IMO. You shed no light on this thread anyway, other than to make one post about what I thought the answer was. Care to share your wit and insight, or were you just bored?

I don't need to dissect this any further, when the risk is obvious. Anyone doing the activity in that video is a walking STD waiting to happen, and I agree with Biomech and Tigercat. If the gel prevented the exchange of fluids from happening, is that not the same thing as saying KY could prevent this with bbfs? If the gel is a barrier, it's a barrier in any case, so that is ludicrous to me.

Rambo....I will catch you in Texas!

Tigercat, thank you for actually stating the real facts and answering my question lol.