DUI Hire Can't Run A Group Chat, Leaks Top Secret War Plans

The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
My point doesn't rely on Heggy inviting him. You've missed the forest and the trees

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/26/u...ite-house.html

And it sure was fun watching some of the backtracking today. And the deer in headlights looks on Ratcliff and Gabbard yesterday about DoD policy.

Sure hope none of their passwords can be easily found online or this is going to be Laurel and Hardy meet the Keystone Cops levels of bullshit Originally Posted by HDGristle

speaking of backtracking how's that working out for The Atlantic?


https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump...b0d0b1f5d2ee55

This is funny asf Originally Posted by HDGristle

The HuffyPoPo



bahaha



Hegseth didn't text anything to any reporter. he posted text in the chat. the reporter wasn't the target he was there by a mistake by a staffer by inviting the reporter.


When Trump's position is Heggy had nothing to do with texting the texts he texted in the group chat you know he's lost the plot Originally Posted by HDGristle



Trtump is correct. Hegseth didn't have anything to do with it.



it's this guy's fault.


It looks like Alex Wong added Jeffrey Goldberg to the chat. You simply can't make the mistake of adding a journalist to your group unless they are in your contacts. If Alex Wong is responsible for adding him, he needs to be immediately fired, and they need to stop using Signal for DoD conversations permanently.


winn dixie's Avatar
Where's the buck stops here accountability?
HDGristle's Avatar
You missed the forest, trees and continent Waco. Thanks for the bump
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
You missed the forest, trees and continent Waco. Thanks for the bump Originally Posted by HDGristle

you keep saying that. your implication is completely false. No one including Hegseth directly texted anything to the reporter.

you know what happened and that isn't it.
HDGristle's Avatar
Every strawman you pull out sets itself on fire.

I use Signal among other options for group chats. This is a perfect example of why you don't put shit out before validating who's in the group.

He's proven to be just as incompetent as one expects a DUI Hire to be
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Every strawman you pull out sets itself on fire.

I use Signal among other options for group chats. This is a perfect example of why you don't put shit out before validating who's in the group Originally Posted by HDGristle

yet another of your deflections. how about showing the top secret war plans in the chat log that backup The Atlantic?


it's right there in the chat log ... right?
HDGristle's Avatar
Asked and answered, counselor
HDGristle's Avatar
https://www.military.com/daily-news/...oops-brig.html

Heggy, Heggy, Heggy... the confidence wanes
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Asked and answered, counselor Originally Posted by HDGristle

name one ... it's in the log ... right?


https://www.military.com/daily-news/...oops-brig.html

Heggy, Heggy, Heggy... the confidence wanes Originally Posted by HDGristle



here's what's gonna happen to Alex Wong ..








bahahhaaaaaa
HDGristle's Avatar
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
ooof!!!



Biden-era guidance encouraged use of Signal app by highly-targeted govt officials: 'Best practice'

'Adopt a free messaging application for secure communications that guarantees end-to-end encryption, such as Signal or similar apps,' 2024 CISA guidance reads

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bid...-best-practice



bahahahhaaaaaaa

and in this case the chat was not compromised it was a staffer working for Waltz who accidentally invited the editor at The Atlantic.
HDGristle's Avatar
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Heggy's own department disagreed. Try again, without blaming Biden for Heggy's mistake and poor judgement

https://www.npr.org/2025/03/25/nx-s1...-vulnerability

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...aked-war-plans

https://defensescoop.com/2025/03/26/...tion.%E2%80%9D Originally Posted by HDGristle

amusing. where is it in those worthless links that disproves the Biden admin encouraged the use of signal?

there isn't any.

so these "experts" aren't disagreeing are they?

you need to accept the fact that this wasn't a hack. some staffer invited that editor by mistake,

and you also need to absolutely accept the FACT That there was no classified intel presented in the chat.
HDGristle's Avatar
Your Biden red herrings are delightful, but meaningless. The hack argument is a strawman and your classification argument is laughable.

Try again
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Your Biden red herrings are delightful, but meaningless. The hack argument is a strawman and your classification argument is laughable.

Try again Originally Posted by HDGristle

why do you always get proven wrong and then by default use your typical "straw-man/confirmation bias/whatabout" nonsense defense?


you prove nothing by this except you are deflecting from the point?


is my argument wrong? i posted what The Atlantic itself said was the actual chat log. go to my post and find one top secret item in it.


the app was not hacked.