The Epstein Files: The DOJ Is Engaged in a Massive Cover-Up

"Democrats thought that the firehose release of Epstein files would "finally" bring down Trump. Instead, not only is that not happening (one can argue the latest batch of docs further cements Trump's claim that he had distanced himself far enough from Esptein in recent decades as this admission from Epstein himself to his favorite scribe Michael Wolff reveals), but it is taking down Democratic "thought titans", each one bigger than the next: first it was Larry Summers, then Bill Clinton, now it's Bill Gates."

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/la...ussian-hookers

Nah...a 'firehose' release amounts to a variation of the 'if you can't dazzle 'em with your brilliance, baffle 'em with your bullshit' theory.

Release millions of pages and thousands of photos, complete with lots of redactions. So much chaff that it's dang near impossible to sort through it all to find the grain of wheat.

Maybe AI can help...or further confuse things (especially if it's Grok and there's picture of females)

Just to add flavor, then make a few files 'disappear' from the release.

Hearing Melinda Gates spill the beans on Bill on that morning talk show said everything as to why she divorced him years ago. To paraphrase Melinda, "I told Bill to stay away from Jeffrey." Busted!

5300+ documents that reference Trump...

IJS.

.

Hoffman went to the Island.

A man who used his fortune to bankroll a lawsuit against President Donald J. Trump is now featured extensively in the new DOJ-released Jeffrey Epstein documents.

The three and a half million documents from the latest – and apparently last – have been released by the DOJ following the approval of the House Resolution 4405, the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Documents from this massive release show the close ties between LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman and the late pedophile (Epstein).

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...-jean-carroll/

Does anyone here really believe that Bill Gates, one of the richest men in the world, couldn’t find someone to get him some antibiotics both for himself and his wife.

Why in the world would he be asking Epstein for help in this matter?

Does anyone here really believe that Bill Gates, one of the richest men in the world, couldn’t find someone to get him some antibiotics both for himself and his wife.

Why in the world would he be asking Epstein for help in this matter? Originally Posted by txdot-guy

The less people who know the dirty stuff he was doing, the less sources of potential blackmail. Plus, I imagine he probably wanted to inform Epstein that someone from his "stable" wasn't clean.

Does anyone here really believe that Bill Gates, one of the richest men in the world, couldn’t find someone to get him some antibiotics both for himself and his wife.

Why in the world would he be asking Epstein for help in this matter? Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Why would one of the wealthiest men end up lying to his wife? You should have heard Melinda talk about her divorce from Bill as she summed it up very quickly on a national news segment. She doesn't like being lied to, cheated on, and played.

Does anyone here really believe that Bill Gates, one of the richest men in the world, couldn’t find someone to get him some antibiotics both for himself and his wife.

Why in the world would he be asking Epstein for help in this matter? Originally Posted by txdot-guy

I got the impression he was looking for ways to sneak antibiotics into his wife without here knowing to avoid being busted.

If you look at the emails they are from Epstein to Epstein. So we don’t have any other information that indicates anything other than they are some kind of an Epstein fever dream or revenge fantasy because Bill told him to F-OFF and wouldn’t do business with him.

My contention is that even if Epstein was Bill Gates p*mp why in the world would anyone take an STD problem to anyone other than your private doctor?

And a man in Gates position who was cheating on his wife would certainly have a private doctor on retainer to keep him from the kind of trouble that we’re all speculating about.

No. you cited a civil lawsuit. the DOJ had nothing to do with it. Biden never directed the DOJ to release anything related to Epstein or Maxwell. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

You are absolutely Under joeys termthat Biden never directed the DOJ to release anything related to Epstein or Maxwell.

And find where I stated that Biden directed the DOJ to release.

Ima getting tired of doing your leg work:

"But things EVENTUALLY move those slow wheels of justice. , it is ordered to start the process of releasing the files. Idk if anyone was screaming for them at the time. But to answer your question, joey did release the files. So, there is no reason to claim he did not."

And we both know you can do the googly:

During his presidency, Joe Biden did not personally order or oversee a comprehensive release of Jeffrey Epstein-related documents. Critics and political figures often highlight that the Biden administration did not make these files a priority for declassification.
However, some materials were released through other channels or specific Department of Justice (DOJ) actions during his term

Though the link is civil, it is directly related to said files and the case was instrumental in getting the ball rolling...under a DOJ that wasn't treated as a club by the POTUS 'ol joey.

You are absolutely Under joeys termthat Biden never directed the DOJ to release anything related to Epstein or Maxwell.

And find where I stated that Biden directed the DOJ to release.

Ima getting tired of doing your leg work:

"But things EVENTUALLY move those slow wheels of justice. , it is ordered to start the process of releasing the files. Idk if anyone was screaming for them at the time. But to answer your question, joey did release the files. So, there is no reason to claim he did not."

And we both know you can do the googly:

During his presidency, Joe Biden did not personally order or oversee a comprehensive release of Jeffrey Epstein-related documents. Critics and political figures often highlight that the Biden administration did not make these files a priority for declassification.
However, some materials were released through other channels or specific Department of Justice (DOJ) actions during his term

Though the link is civil, it is directly related to said files and the case was instrumental in getting the ball rolling...under a DOJ that wasn't treated as a club by the POTUS 'ol joey. Originally Posted by Precious_b

in other news ...


Harris defends Biden administration decision not to release Jeffrey Epstein files

https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...epstein-files/



Klobuchar defends Democrats for inaction on Epstein case under Biden

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/...ction-epstein/


sounds like Joey covered up for all the Democrats like Clinton in those files, yes?


shocking!

“But, as you know, it is not a crime to party with Mr. Epstein,”


Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche

You are absolutely Under joeys termthat Biden never directed the DOJ to release anything related to Epstein or Maxwell.

And find where I stated that Biden directed the DOJ to release.

Ima getting tired of doing your leg work:

"But things EVENTUALLY move those slow wheels of justice. , it is ordered to start the process of releasing the files. Idk if anyone was screaming for them at the time. But to answer your question, joey did release the files. So, there is no reason to claim he did not."

And we both know you can do the googly:

During his presidency, Joe Biden did not personally order or oversee a comprehensive release of Jeffrey Epstein-related documents. Critics and political figures often highlight that the Biden administration did not make these files a priority for declassification.
However, some materials were released through other channels or specific Department of Justice (DOJ) actions during his term

Though the link is civil, it is directly related to said files and the case was instrumental in getting the ball rolling...under a DOJ that wasn't treated as a club by the POTUS 'ol joey. Originally Posted by Precious_b

in other news ...


Harris defends Biden administration decision not to release Jeffrey Epstein files

https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...epstein-files/



Klobuchar defends Democrats for inaction on Epstein case under Biden

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/...ction-epstein/


sounds like Joey covered up for all the Democrats like Clinton in those files, yes?


shocking! Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

What is shocking about that?
Oh. Yes. It is shocking to maggies.
They are so use to the orange dicktator trying to consolidate all 3 branches of government under his cheato dusted fingers that they forget the Justice Department is a co-equal branch that operates independently.

Allowing such "sounds" like an open, transparent government.

I can see why one party would do everything to keep the Epstein files from the light of day and the other would allow the DOJ to handle them as they see fit.

Hint: last count, the Big Cheato appeared 5,000+ times in the Epstein files that have been released so far.
How many times is ol' joey mentioned?

What is shocking about that?
Oh. Yes. It is shocking to maggies.
They are so use to the orange dicktator trying to consolidate all 3 branches of government under his cheato dusted fingers that they forget the Justice Department is a co-equal branch that operates independently.

Allowing such "sounds" like an open, transparent government.

I can see why one party would do everything to keep the Epstein files from the light of day and the other would allow the DOJ to handle them as they see fit.

Hint: last count, the Big Cheato appeared 5,000+ times in the Epstein files that have been released so far.
How many times is ol' joey mentioned? Originally Posted by Precious_b

The justice department is not a coequal branch of government and never has been independent. The norm since at least Nixon however is for the President to keep his hands off the running of the institution so as to keep the partisan politics away from actual justice.