Are you handicap friendly provider?

Sooner...... have you not read the board very much ? How can you not get that London and Naomi do not let public opinion dictate what they post. They say what they feel and let the chips fall where they may. This isn't a new trend. They are doing just fine with their business Originally Posted by CarolinaGent

I understand that now bro.. I think I'm going to exit out of this thread. My points have been made and it won't do any good to argue back and forth.

FWIW, it's not what you say but how you say it. That point I get.

The topic is handicapped clients. There is another thread for racial issues, use it.

uggh this thread went downhill fast

This thread has become quite negative.

Well don't all threads turn negative when it has to do with what a provider does or does not do? I mean afterall, we are all just dirty whores who no longer have a right to choose who we see according to some. SMDH. Heaven forbid a hobbyist does the SAME THING in a review lol. Gotta love irony!

TOPIC: Are you handicap friendly provider?

Funny biaatch!

I think people need to realize that this is a business involving all types of people and situations. Not seeing certain people has nothing to do with compassion...this is not Red Cross! It's fking! Not having compassion would be denying employment or a hot meal to someone...but pu**y? Get real! You can't force someone to screw anyone, so stop trying! Some of us do NOT have incalls that are equipped to handle a wheelchair...period! When you are ready to expalin and pay to make the doors wider and remove the stairs, let us know...thancks!
Oh, and Merry fkin Christmas! Originally Posted by London Rayne

NOT ON TOPIC!

They made up....ijs. Originally Posted by London Rayne

NOT ON TOPIC!

WTF...this is not about race! I guess Chica's comments didn't sink in! Who she sees or does not see is NOT the topic of this thread. She is not the only one...just the only one woman enough not to give fk about what others think.

If you are going to get all butt hurt every time a provider refuses to see someone based on whatever reason, you are going to be one pissed off person. Why not just see women that you don't have to beg to see your POV...just sayin. No one really owes you or anyone else here any explanation as to "why" they do things. The thread was about if you do or don't...not a moral compass thread. So it's ok for YOU to judge her because she "won't" do something, but not ok for her to decide who she sells her body to? Makes perfect sense lol. Originally Posted by London Rayne

NOT ON TOPIC!

You must just want points lol. This is NOT ABOUT MARKETING! Perhaps when you become a hooker, you will have the right to preach on who we should fk...until then, you don't. Why not start another thread about who cares about offending people on a hooker board? I doubt most of the best clients are always found on one. I doubt the pro white men she sees, really care about who she does not see lol. They just want to get laid! Originally Posted by London Rayne

NOT ON TOPIC!

The point is that no one gives a fk what offends YOU lol. The thread is not about you! If a woman chooses not to see someone for WHATEVER reason, it's HER choice! This is not a legal business where we can't discriminate...duh! I won't see certain people either, and until you are my pimp you won't dictate who I will or will not see. When are you guys going to get this?

No one cares what you think when it comes to OUR BODIES! This is a business of humanism to some degree, and you can't force someone to fk who they don't want. By that theory, you are basically saying a hooker should do what makes her feel uncomfortable just because she gets paid...sounds a lot like being mentally raped IMO. "Stupid whores should fk anyone and everyone for a buck." Mighty telling dude. You are in reverse putting a stigma on paid companions by assuming we no longer have a choice. Thanks pimp!

MANY women do not see handicapped people, black people, white people, asian people, fat people, etc.

You nor I, or anyone else here will EVER change the way one person decides to do business. It's not regulated by laws and morality in the first place lol. The thread is not about marketing period! It's not a pissing match based on what you think. It was a simple question that required a yes or no answer. No further explanation is necessary. It's really none of our business "why." Originally Posted by London Rayne

NOT ON TOPIC!

Not on topic...can't really answer that one.

Well said Laz. Anyone making demands on what a woman should do with her body has no moral conscience to begin with as far as I am concerned. If someone is not comfortable having sex for whatever reason, that's not for us to judge. It is rather hypocritical to say one should not judge people, then do so in the very same breath lol.

We don't know what is in the mind of another person, and to say that just because we are in a business that we no longer have the right to feel comfortable, is fkin retarded!

As you said, what would they prefer...the woman who just needs a buck that bad to take their money and white knuckle it through the date? I can just see the review lol. You are damned if you do, and damned if you don't I guess. Originally Posted by London Rayne

NOT ON TOPIC!

FWIW, it's not what you say but how you say it. That point I get. Originally Posted by London Rayne

NOT ON TOPIC!

Well don't all threads turn negative when it has to do with what a provider does or does not do? I mean afterall, we are all just dirty whores who no longer have a right to choose who we see according to some. SMDH. Heaven forbid a hobbyist does the SAME THING in a review lol. Gotta love irony! Originally Posted by London Rayne

NOT ON TOPIC!

London, I mean this with the utmost respect. But I'm certain Naomi can answer for herself. She is very well spoken and does a great job sharing her thoughts and feelings! Sooner12 addressed Naomi at post #63 and you took over from there! Most of your posts are personal in nature and for the most part never once answered the question, "Are you handicap friendly provider?" I waited till now to mention it, as I think Sooner12 can hold his own with anyone on this board. He doesn't need anyone coming to his rescue or speaking for him! And I'm pretty sure neither does Naomi! Just saying.......

Back on Topic.... Oh shit I'm NOT a provider or a MOD!


Oh look a puppy!

SL Disclaimer: My piss you off button is in the off mode. I am voicing my personal opinion and am not speaking for any one but myself nor am I telling anyone what they should do, or what they might choose is wrong!

I mean afterall, we are all just dirty whores who no longer have a right to choose who we see according to some. SMDH. Originally Posted by London Rayne

This is definitely not the way that I feel. In fact, if you speak with my references they will tell you that I showed them an incredible amount of respect. Two of them sent me texts thanking me for being such a gentleman and making the experience nice for them.

I have a lot of respect for the ladies who do this, and strongly believe that this should be a legal business. I go all across the world working. I've met ladies with Doctorate degrees serving as providers in Europe(which made them more sexy to me) to Ethopian housemaids in the Middle East doing this business. I've shown them all equal respect and appreciation.

I recommended against openly excluding handicap people and said that as a customer, I will not see any provider who does that. Now, whether she cares or not that she won't get my business -- that is her decision.

I did not state that she doesn't have a right to choose who she sees. But like anything else, she needs to be prepared to live with the consequences of her actions just like everywhere else in life.

I have not read the thread, I would rather scratch my balls ... but given that most fucktards challenged in some way, I would imagine most ladies deal with the challenged on a daily basis.

This is definitely not the way that I feel. In fact, if you speak with my references they will tell you that I showed them an incredible amount of respect. Two of them sent me texts thanking me for being such a gentleman and making the experience nice for them.

I have a lot of respect for the ladies who do this, and strongly believe that this should be a legal business. I go all across the world working. I've met ladies with Doctorate degrees serving as providers in Europe(which made them more sexy to me) to Ethopian housemaids in the Middle East doing this business. I've shown them all equal respect and appreciation.

I recommended against openly excluding handicap people and said that as a customer, I will not see any provider who does that. Now, whether she cares or not that she won't get my business -- that is her decision.

I did not state that she doesn't have a right to choose who she sees. But like anything else, she needs to be prepared to live with the consequences of her actions just like everywhere else in life. Originally Posted by Soonerman12

Good god. Live with what consequences? Sooner, you are clueless.
Consequences because I am vocal about who I will and will not see? As if!
Move on Buddy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bqGV...eature=related

Sooner, London and Naomi have been around a long time! It doesn't take long to find out, if you don't have an opinion, they'll give you one! They are NOT for the faith of heart. But deep down inside they are wonderful people! I happen to know as do several others here than Sweetie Naomi will be traveling out of state and providing a free session I believe to a disabled vet. If in fact she has not already done so. I support her right to be as selective as she wants with her time, body and business! And I applaud her kindness. There are not a lot of providers that would do something like that! If I'm correct in my statement then I would say Naomi is more than accommodating when it comes to disabled gentleman! And London is a kitty wearing a frog hat! What can you say to that! LOL

uggh this thread went downhill fast Originally Posted by SkylarCruzWantsYou

This thread has become quite negative. Originally Posted by LamayaCox

Yep it did, Sorry about that.
Pretty typical when some strong personalities express themselves.

Sooner, London and Naomi have been around a long time! It doesn't take long to find out, if you don't have an opinion, they'll give you one! They are NOT for the faith of heart. But deep down inside they are wonderful people! I happen to know as do several others here than Sweetie Naomi will be traveling out of state and providing a free session I believe to a disabled vet. If in fact she has not already done so. I support her right to be as selective as she wants with her time, body and business! And I applaud her kindness. There are not a lot of providers that would do something like that! If I'm correct in my statement then I would say Naomi is more than accommodating when it comes to disabled gentleman! And London is a kitty wearing a frog hat! What can you say to that! LOL Originally Posted by Still Looking

London, I am going to start an "Occupy London Rain" Campaign. I want your ASS avatar back (it still shows in "Featured ECCIE Showcases" on the homepage. BUT, not when you post in forum's .

Of more importance, and along the lines of the OP's Q, the beautiful women I've selected to see (not out of horniness but out of exotic beauty and rare essence), I would definitely see them again in the future if say, they were in a car accident or other and lost a limb, lost an eye, suffered burns, you call it...I don't see someone out of pitty but at the same time, the ladies I've had the fortune of being with I would see regardless of an acquired handicap post our first visit...they are HOTTT to me because sure of their physical beauty, but their minds and eroticism are what keep me coming back...nothing hotter than fucking (her) with one leg, downward dawg...she's still sexy to me!

Sooner, London and Naomi have been around a long time! It doesn't take long to find out, if you don't have an opinion, they'll give you one! They are NOT for the faith of heart. But deep down inside they are wonderful people! I happen to know as do several others here than Sweetie Naomi will be traveling out of state and providing a free session I believe to a disabled vet. If in fact she has not already done so. I support her right to be as selective as she wants with her time, body and business! And I applaud her kindness. There are not a lot of providers that would do something like that! If I'm correct in my statement then I would say Naomi is more than accommodating when it comes to disabled gentleman! And London is a kitty wearing a frog hat! What can you say to that! LOL Originally Posted by Still Looking

Thanks for that. I didn't know the vet was disabled but I would love to see him anyways. And No I had a change of plans but reached out to let the guy that arranged the meeting that I'll be rescheduling. Anything for the vets. I may delete this in a few. I don't want people to know that I have a heart.

Um... and btw it wasn't a free session. The donation would be half of what I charge. I ain't that nice just saying LMFAO