Who Wins First Presidential Debate

hardly anybody gets it.

whether obamney or rombama wins, nothing changes.

... since we have no troops in Iraq? Originally Posted by wellendowed1911

What?

The major problem Romney will face is that he believed we should have stayed in Iraq longer- I assume you most have meant Afghanistan and not Iarq since we have no troops in Iraq? Originally Posted by wellendowed1911

Whichever. I've never heard any statement made by Romney to that affect in this campaigne. Obama will have a repeat performance in the next debate trust me.

The major problem Romney will face is that he believed we should have stayed in Iraq longer- I assume you most have meant Afghanistan and not Iarq since we have no troops in Iraq? Originally Posted by wellendowed1911

us-special-forces-deployed-iraq-again#

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?...highlight=iraq

http://www.thenation.com/article/170...ed-iraq-again#

Best thing is if you aren't going to vote for either of them you don't have to watch...

Whichever. I've never heard any statement made by Romney to that affect in this campaigne. Obama will have a repeat performance in the next debate trust me. Originally Posted by acp5762

You might want to read this article: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/1...nd-of-Iraq-war or this article: http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/...alk_about_iraq

Thanks for your previous comments, wellendowed Sometimes it sucks to have integrity. LOL

But I did want to tip my hat to you!!!

Personally, it probably is not a good idea if Obaminable plays any "military cards" in the next rounds. Particularly if he fails to correct the current voting problems for those overseas.

But I guess one is protecting voting rights when and where it counts for him ....

Well, I must admit that all the newspapers and talking heads are fairly unamious in giving the first debate to Mitt Romney on points, but without a knock-out punch.

However, there is a lot of pschology involved in running a campaign for the highest office in the country.

Is it possible for President Obama to have been playing with his opponent like say, Rocky did when he was fighting some of his opponents in the ring or Muhammad Ali did with his rope-a-dope?

I would say that is is entirely possible that while Romney and his handlers are all high-fiving each other over the outcome of the first debate, they won't be prepared for the powerful left hook coming in the second debate!

. . . Float like a butterfly, but sting like a bee!

Obama punches below his weight. Like FastCumm's posts.

.

The best way to sum it IMHO- Romney won- but wasn't a knock out- but guys remember- Micheal Jordan had a few off games in his career- Tiger Woods in his prime had bad games- Muhammad Ali didn't win every fight- it's all about how he responds in the 2nd debate- again go back to 2004- Kerry wiped Bush's ass on the 1st debate and Bush came back strong or held his own in the 2nd and 3rd debates.

Heck in the primaries Romney didn't win every debate there were 2 of them in which he looked very bad.

Well, I must admit that all the newspapers and talking heads are fairly unamious in giving the first debate to Mitt Romney on points, but without a knock-out punch.

However, there is a lot of pschology involved in running a campaign for the highest office in the country.

Is it possible for President Obama to have been playing with his opponent like say, Rocky did when he was fighting some of his opponents in the ring or Muhammad Ali did with his rope-a-dope?

I would say that is is entirely possible that while Romney and his handlers are all high-fiving each other over the outcome of the first debate, they won't be prepared for the powerful left hook coming in the second debate!

. . . Float like a butterfly, but sting like a bee!
Originally Posted by Fast Gunn

You've outdone yourself. That is your stupidest post ever. No one with a IQ above room temperature would seriously even consider what your suggesting.

Your post does show just how desparate the die hard Obamazombies are to explain his pathetic performance.

I thought Al Gore had an incredibly stupid explaination. He said Obama was effected by the altitude. Your explaination is far stupider. You make Al Gore sound positively sensable.

Is it possible for President Obama to have been playing with his opponent like say, Rocky did when he was fighting some of his opponents in the ring or Muhammad Ali did with his rope-a-dope?

I would say that is is entirely possible that while Romney and his handlers are all high-fiving each other over the outcome of the first debate, they won't be prepared for the powerful left hook coming in the second debate!

. . . Float like a butterfly, but sting like a bee! Originally Posted by Fast Gunn

Speaking of which...

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blog....html?mobify=0

You've outdone yourself. That is your stupidest post ever. No one with a IQ above room temperature would seriously even consider what your suggesting.

Your post does show just how desparate the die hard Obamazombies are to explain his pathetic performance.

I thought Al Gore had an incredibly stupid explaination. He said Obama was effected by the altitude. Your explaination is far stupider. You make Al Gore sound positively sensable. Originally Posted by joe bloe

JB, what do you expect from a fucking idiot?

On a side note... I bet Barack didn't get any pussy last night...LMMFAO