What do you think of a 10 million gun owner march on Washington?

Neither the Aurora nor Sandy Hook shooters were legally in possession of the firearms they used. Simply ignore the facts, Assup, and make up whatever you want. You will anyway, which is why you were named Dipshit of the Year.

These things did not happen because one legal gunowner out of 10 million had a bad day. These things happened because a lunatic was able to obtain a gun illegally.

Why do you want to punish responsible gun owners, who have committed no crime, because some lunatics with illegal guns went on a rampage?

OK. I knew there was a condemnation of President Clinton in there somewhere. Must feel like old times, Whiny! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

My recollection is that Koresh jogged almost daily with a local deputy sheriff, who had developed at least a trusting relationship with Koresh sufficient to entice him away from the compound for a "jog" ... but at the same time it is my recollection that there were people who had left the compound before the assault by the Feds who portrayed a plan to defend the compound against an attack. There was an arsenal and fuel inside the building.

Things "warmed up" a bit when Federal agents started getting shot on the roof of the compound as they were attempting to make an entry through a window .. and then culminated in an armoured vehilce (tank?) being driven literally into the compound building to penetrate the structure.

The word "fiasco" comes to mind.

Janet Reno fell on the sword on that one, but from what I recall she was the one swinging the sword. If the raid in Pakistan would have gone bad (almost did!), then Gates would have fallen on the sword.

Anyone who uses children as a shield are the killers of the children.

Jim Jones was a hero to the right.They love Kool aid.

Anyone who uses children as a shield are the killers of the children. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Not according to COG.

Where are these 10,000,000 marchers?

Neither the Aurora nor Sandy Hook shooters were legally in possession of the firearms they used. Simply ignore the facts, Assup, and make up whatever you want. You will anyway, which is why you were named Dipshit of the Year.

These things did not happen because one legal gunowner out of 10 million had a bad day. These things happened because a lunatic was able to obtain a gun illegally.

Why do you want to punish responsible gun owners, who have committed no crime, because some lunatics with illegal guns went on a rampage? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

The Sandy Hook weapons were purchased legally by the shooter's Mom who taught him how to use them.

I don't want to punish any law abiding citizen for the sins of others. Nor did I infer that. Why you felt it necessary to take a false statement and magnify it with an utter lie is beyond me. You continue to be a lying sack of shit.

again, I don't think you're mentally stable enough to own a gun ... Or a hammer, for that matter.

I don't want to punish any law abiding citizen for the sins of others. Nor did I infer that. Why you felt it necessary to take a false statement and magnify it with an utter lie is beyond me. You continue to be a lying sack of shit.

Sounds of incredulous silence. The pot has just called the kettle black.

Actually, an Amendment to the Constitution of the United States ... Something that wasnt part of the main document and wasnt added for a number of years after the main document was ratified.

. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Wow, trivializing The Bill of Rights. Just amazing.

You talk like there is blasphemy here. Im not trivializing anything. Its simply the truth.

If anything, the founding fathers' priorities were just different than yours. And don't forget, the First Amendment was first, though you obviously don't think Im entitled to my First Amendment right to tell the truth here.

Hypocritical answer. You can do better.

I don't want to punish any law abiding citizen for the sins of others. Nor did I infer that. Why you felt it necessary to take a false statement and magnify it with an utter lie is beyond me. You continue to be a lying sack of shit.

Sounds of incredulous silence. The pot has just called the kettle black. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Please explain, asshole.

You talk like there is blasphemy here. Im not trivializing anything. Its simply the truth.

If anything, the founding fathers' priorities were just different than yours. And don't forget, the First Amendment was first, though you obviously don't think Im entitled to my First Amendment right to tell the truth here.

Hypocritical answer. You can do better. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

No, I do not think one of "The Bill of Rights" is any more important than the other. All were put there with one fundemental thought, to protect citizens against a represive Government.
The Bill of Rights are the supreme law of the land when it comes to the way Government interacts with the citizens of the Country.. They are very unique in that unlike many laws, they do not tell the Government what it can do, they tell the Government what it can't do. Nothing trumps them. Period.

OK. So?

The Sandy Hook weapons were purchased legally by the shooter's Mom who taught him how to use them.

I don't want to punish any law abiding citizen for the sins of others. Nor did I infer that. Why you felt it necessary to take a false statement and magnify it with an utter lie is beyond me. You continue to be a lying sack of shit.

again, I don't think you're mentally stable enough to own a gun ... Or a hammer, for that matter. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Was Adam Lanza legally allowed to possess or own a gun? If not, he was not legally in possession of the guns he used. Where is the lie, Assup? Oh, yeah, you're the liar.

And with each post, Assup, you prove your mental stability and rationality. You are an example to us all.

DIPSHIT OF THE YEAR 2013

ASSUP!!!

you boys need a 10mg valium and a glass of good merlot ..

Who doesn't need that?