Recorded Sessions?

As is your style, you lie about someone or what someone said and when you get called out you don't produce any FACTS to support it. And you want to give advice to people on this board?

You have about 50 pages of your BS confirming ...


you will record your sessions and what Papi was doing is ok with you. Originally Posted by LexusLover

No there are 50 pages of me saying it is legal to audio record these conversations. Are you trying to now say you agree with me?

I said the activities papi talked about doing...it would have been wise for him to audio record her agreeing to said activity. If someone wanted to kick you in the nuts and fulfill a butt fuck rape fantasy on your ass and you agreed to let them....i would advocate they audio record your consent so you would not later say you were raped.

I would neither want to play your role in the rape fantasy or papi's role.

Anymore questions?

Another LIE of yours, WTF.

So, you CANNOT PRODUCE ANY POST OF MINE THAT SAYS:

"audio recording a private encounter was illegal."

? Originally Posted by LexusLover

Have you produced a quote telling Dorthy Moron she is wrong to believe that audio recordings are illegal in a private sexual encounter?

I can produce the quote where she said she believed you and where i asked you to help her see the error of her way. You never did. You convoluted audio and video recording and have never acknowledged the difference in the two.

You sir degraded the woman who recorded the Vice officer as if she did something wrong. Why is that? Why have you not acknowledged that it is legal to audio record these encounters? Why can't you produce a single quote where you agree that it is legal to audio record these encounters? So you are now saying you have been agreeing with me all along? Is that the bullshit you are trying to sell? All this arguing on your part was you really agreeing with me?

Things that make me go Hmmmmmmm.

i'm sure by now you're on cute papi's Christmas card list, you are even better than his public pretender.....I mean defender....... Originally Posted by Tony Gambino

Tony....folks said it was illegal to audio record a sexual encounter. ..that was a lie. That has been the jest of my post, to separate fact from fiction. Each and every person can then make an informed decision based on what works best for them.

I have no reason to either defend or crucify papi .


.

Now we r arguing whether recording is legal or not? Can we go back to the original story of why some guy that it was OK to record. I was eating pop corn but I think this entertainment needs to go back to what it was all about.

Tell us how you really feel about DearHunter,,,just damn.
You didn't have to rape him,,,IJS Originally Posted by Lorde

Now let me be perfectly clear...
I did not rape that pimp Dick sucker.

But first a word from the friendly folks at "Checkerboard Square" and
a little word for our topic:

"Recording without permission is yucky! Don't be yucky!"

in a separate thread DH asked someone how pimp dick taste. (I think he was being fellatious)
Is that how its spelled? Well anyways, I answered, "Prolly surprisingly close to dick you've
had in the past." And he got a red ass but then requested a session, offering me a Ref. so
I jissed in his mouth and he now won't pony up the Ref! Men are pigs!
As I said, I did not rape that pimp dick sucker.

Now everyone, please let this thread die a quick painless death and get out and enjoy the
weekend. Break out the jackets and enjoy good tennis, good golf or whatever makes you happy. Warm regards,

py

Now we r arguing whether recording is legal or not? Can we go back to the original story of why some guy that it was OK to record. I was eating pop corn but I think this entertainment needs to go back to what it was all about. Originally Posted by iquit

That was like 50 post ago. Now we were debating whether or not providers should record their clients as a safeguard. There are opposing views on the subject. I don't think it's a good idea.

BIG BLACK COCK!!!!!

BIG BLACK COCK!!!!! Originally Posted by junglemonkey

What does a "BIG BLACK COCK" have anything to do with recording a session?
Btw.....not every black guy has a BIG COCK. Let's not go stereo type all black men now.
I've seen some tiny ones before.

COCK.....BALLS!!!!!!!

Is that PC enough for you?

WHERE??? WHO?? He most of been MIXED greens

What does a "BIG BLACK COCK" have anything to do with recording a session?
Btw.....not every black guy has a BIG COCK. Let's not go stereo type all black men now.
I've seen some tiny ones before. Originally Posted by Luvs2Purrr

"Recording without permission is yucky! Don't be yucky!"



Now everyone, please let this thread die a quick painless death

py Originally Posted by pyro

Mr. Fucky Yucky just quit posting in this thread if you want it to die. There is nothing yucky about protecting yourself with a audio recording btw.

Tell it to my balls, tell it to my balls...

Oh, and you are yucky because you record.

(funny and on topic! I'm a pistol.)

I still got it!

py

Tell it to my balls, tell it to my balls...

Oh, and you are yucky because you record.

(funny and on topic! I'm a pistol.)

I still got it!

py Originally Posted by pyro

Gay guys and little girls use the term yucky...which are you?

Looks like a provider would be smart to record an encounter with you.


.

[QUOTE=WTF;1057444360]Gay guys and little girls use the term yucky...which are you?


Why I'm yo little girl, pumpkin...
and you are a sick degenerate fuk because you want to
record me stuffing my panties in your filthy mouth.
Stranger danger! Stranger danger!
Now suck your little girl's dick biatch!

Oh, and you're still yucky!

Bahahahahahaha!