Why are ty hey charging the parents in the Michigan school shooting?

Easily triggered. .... Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

You don't "think" ... you blabber.

... surely seem like reasonable behavour from the school officials.

### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

So the counselors concluded " he did not intend on committing either self-harm or harm to others," while his parents were there. Now we know why the parents did not feel the need to take him home.



Upon the parents' arrival, the school counselors asked the student "specific probing questions" about his potential for self-harm or harm toward others, Throne said. The answers he provided "led counselors to again conclude he did not intend on committing either self-harm or harm to others," according to the letter.

You just left him and his shadow, WTFDoIKnow, behind ...

... with the "school officials" reference.

GEDs don't require "officials" for guidance. Originally Posted by LexusLover

What are you even talking about?

I have not advocated for the school officials as being responsible. And...and nor have I suggested that the parents are responsible. Unlike many , including ug ou, I'd like to see more facts emerge.

But hey counselor if you're in the prediction business now like a few more data points before making my prediction. ....more power to you.

You just left him and his shadow, WTFDoIKnow, behind ...

... with the "school officials" reference.

GEDs don't require "officials" for guidance. Originally Posted by LexusLover

... I didn't ask.

### Salty

You don't "think" ... you blabber. Originally Posted by LexusLover

See what I mean?

You can assume anything you want about me. And I'll continue to assume you tried to get away with something so stupid you waste your time here bitching and moaning after being disbarred.

She doesn't get legal, so much as practical and pioneering. An easy five-minute listen.


Prosecutor in Crumbley case says charging parents in school shootings is warranted


https://www.npr.org/2021/12/16/10649...ngs-is-warrant

NPR's Mary Louise Kelly speaks with Oakland County prosecutor Karen McDonald about working on the Oxford High School shooting case and working towards safer schools.

So the counselors concluded " he did not intend on committing either self-harm or harm to others," while his parents were there. Now we know why the parents did not feel the need to take him home.



Upon the parents' arrival, the school counselors asked the student "specific probing questions" about his potential for self-harm or harm toward others, Throne said. The answers he provided "led counselors to again conclude he did not intend on committing either self-harm or harm to others," according to the letter. Originally Posted by WTF

... YOU and E-9500 actually remind me of a good point.

Interesting that they ALL wanna absolve themselves
of blame by surely holding the parents at fault.

Odd thing, though... WHY is it when there's NO parents
involved - like when they let a bloke on parole from
prison - and he then kills his ex or girlfriend the
next day - the parole board or state barrister who
released the killer dont face any charges??

How fair is THAT?

#### Salty

... YOU and E-9500 actually remind me of a good point.

Interesting that they ALL wanna absolve themselves
of blame by surely holding the parents at fault.

Odd thing, though... WHY is it when there's NO parents
involved - like when they let a bloke on parole from
prison - and he then kills his ex or girlfriend the
next day - the parole board or state barrister who
released the killer dont face any charges??

How fair is THAT?

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

Time served.

I heard enough from a supervising arresting officer describing the PC upon which the arrest was based to conclude they had PC and apparently a Judge agreed since a warrant was in place for their arrest.

WTFDoIKnow aka WTF hasn't researched it yet ...



IMO if more "parents" got arrested and convicted some of this school shit would stop. Originally Posted by LexusLover

If you think their arrest...it it safe to say you think they should be found guilty, not necessarily because they are but because it will stop gun violence in schools?

Is that your contention?

You want the parents to be held accountable on their ability to predict the future.

If you think their arrest...it it safe to say you think they should be found guilty, not necessarily because they are but because it will stop gun violence in schools?

Is that your contention?

You want the parents to be held accountable on their ability to predict the future. Originally Posted by WTF

All suspects are innocent until proven guilty. Ha!

Anyway. The evidence was there, in my opinion, to charge them with criminal negligence. Gonna listen again to the NPR "interview".

... Well, "criminal negligence" has to be "criminal" BEFORE the fact.

If they bought their son a gun - and it's legal for the son
to own a gun - then the ACT there is NOT criminal.

... They'll need MORE to find the parents guilty.

### "barrister" Salty

... Well, "criminal negligence" has to be "criminal" BEFORE the fact.

If they bought their son a gun - and it's legal for the son
to own a gun - then the ACT there is NOT criminal.

... They'll need MORE to find the parents guilty.

### "barrister" Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

. Think there is a tad more to it than that.. .but it does seem the state wants you to be like "Minority Report" like parents

... I'm sure that the do have "more" with things, mate.
But I agree that the school conselours and what-not
ALSO may have made a mistake with the boy.

Can't just blame the parents here.
I think you and I are in good agreement on that.

### Salty

... I'm sure that the do have "more" with things, mate.
But I agree that the school conselours and what-not
ALSO may have made a mistake with the boy.

Can't just blame the parents here.
I think you and I are in good agreement on that.

### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

Fake Eumillipes persephone

Fake Eumillipes persephone Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

What does this have to do with millipedes?


Fyi... Its only 3.7" long and has 1,306 legs. It quite earthwormy!