HILLARY CLINTON CULABLE FOR BENGHAZI FROM BEGINNING TO END.........

Excellent representation of the truth, Cpt. It should be clear to even the stupidest among us, however, we underestimated the level of stupid. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

You are near the top!!!

and what is it youre trying to gain? Obie cant be impeached, and Hillary made a bad decision is punishable by what?

Smearing her trying to slow her dowm for the next general election? ... that's laughable.

mark my words, If you think when Hillary runs for president Slick Willie wont stump for her and dissect the Benghazi timeline and use the republican State Dept cuts I mentioned as a first line of defense,you better think again. The longer you slobber over this political attempt to slow her down, the better Billy likes it. By the time he finishes with the repubs they will be a small crack in the super highway to another dem victory. Keep it up 3 more years and the voting public will be as sick of it as they are the birth certificate bs, which btw hasn't worked out so well has it?

Like I commented on earlier, watching rightwingers cut their throats is a new sport. I give you a standing ovation for being to fucking stupid to understand why ..

so by all means, smear the living shit out of something that has no bearing on any future election then ask yourself why the right lost AGAIN. Originally Posted by CJ7

Your post, CBJ7, is essentially a concession that Odumbo and HildaBeast displayed poor leadership in that they allowed Benghazi to happen and then failed to respond appropriately. Then you go on to echo HildaBeast's "What difference does it make?" refrain and justify that position with a prediction that HildaBeast and Slick Willie will spin this incident into insignificance. Hence, you have admitted HildaBeast and Odumbo are inveterate liars, but you'll blindly support their lying asses anyway.

“The Call Came … On September 12, 2012.” As the screen goes black, the words continue: “Security Requests Denied. Four Americans Dead. And an Administration whose story is still changing. The Call Came.”

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics...hat-never-ran/

"What difference does it make?"

Diplomatic security officer and former regional security officer in Libya, Eric Nordstrom, emotionally testified:

". . . getting to the bottom of what happened in Benghazi matters to the families of Christopher Stevens, Sean Smith, Glenn Doherty and Tyrone Woods, the four US agents killed in the attack. . . .

"the lessons state department employees can expect to have taken from Benghazi: Whether you're at a mission, preparing for a hearing, or you're standing on top of a building surrounded by a mob . . . the message is the same: You're on your own."

And as a reminder: while testifying before Congress, Charlene Lamb, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for International Programs, was asked if the refusal to provide more security caused by budget cuts to embassy security? She answered:

“No, sir.”

Another reminder, HildaBeast cut and denied security in Libya, ordered an ambassador into harm's way in Benghazi, allowed him to be killed on 9/11 -- a date with great historical significance, and then she politicized the issue when she began to lie and blame it on a BS videotape to cover her lame-ass leadership skills.

On Nov. 28, 2012, White House spokesman Jay Carney speaking to reporters said the following:

“Ambassador Rice was using unclassified talking points that were developed by the intelligence community and provided not just to her, not just to the executive branch, but to the legislative branch. And they represented the best assessment by our intelligence professionals about what had happened in Benghazi at that time.”

“The White House and the State Department have made clear that the single adjustment that was made to those talking points by either of those two — of these two institutions were changing the word ‘consulate’ to ‘diplomatic facility,’ because ‘consulate’ was inaccurate. Those talking points originated from the intelligence community. They reflect the IC’s best assessments of what they thought had happened.”

Note how Carney stressed that this was “developed by the intelligence community” and the “talking points originated from the intelligence community.”

In a narrow sense, this is correct. Both the House report and the Weekly Standard say the CIA created — or “originated” — the first draft of the talking points. The version as of Friday morning, Sept. 14, 2012, was rather detailed, saying that “Islamic extremists with ties to al-Qaeda participated in the attack” and mentioning the militant group Ansar al-Sharia. It also referred to previous attacks against foreign interests and the possibility there had been surveillance of the U.S. facility.

But a senior State Department official — identified by the Weekly Standard as State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland — objected to this draft after being asked to clear the talking points for release. The CIA made some changes, but apparently that was not enough. Nuland said in an e-mail disclosed by the House report that the edits did not “resolve all my issues or those of my building leadership” and that the State Department’s leadership “was consulting with [National Security Staff.]”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/the-benghazi-talking-points-whats-known-and-unknown/2013/05/06/f689ee08-b693-11e2-b94c-b684dda07add_blog.html

This administration lied about Benghazi, it lied about Fast and Furious and it lied about Odumbocare. BTW, even Morning Joe and ABC News are now reporting how the Odumbo administration changed the Benghazi talking points and lied to save its collective political ass.

Sorry Ida Bell your spin won't stick the (facts) are coming out. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Yes, the facts are coming out, but it's you and CBJ7 who are doing the spinning and deflecting.

The Benghazi Talking Points
And how they were changed to obscure the truth
MAY 13, 2013, VOL. 18, NO. 33 • BY STEPHEN F. HAYES

Even as the White House strove last week to move beyond questions about the Benghazi attacks of Tuesday, September 11, 2012, fresh evidence emerged that senior Obama administration officials knowingly misled the country about what had happened in the days following the assaults. The Weekly Standard has obtained a timeline briefed by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence detailing the heavy substantive revisions made to the CIA’s talking points, just six weeks before the 2012 presidential election, and additional information about why the changes were made and by whom.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/benghazi-talking-points_720543.html

nah, essentially I said dopes like you are handing the dems the next 2 presidential elections, and people like Billy are poised to chew you up like a broom handle in a termite mound AND essentially youre too stupid to see it coming

nah, essentially I said dopes like you are handing the dems the next 2 presidential elections, and people like Billy are poised to chew you up like a broom handle in a termite mound AND essentially youre too stupid to see it coming Originally Posted by CJ7

As mentioned above, CBJ7, you've conceded that Odumbo and HildaBeast displayed poor leadership in that they allowed Benghazi to happen and then failed to respond appropriately. You then echoed HildaBeast's "What difference does it make?" refrain and justify that position with a prediction that HildaBeast and Slick Willie will spin this incident into insignificance. Hence, you have admitted HildaBeast and Odumbo are inveterate liars, and you've admitted you'll blindly support their lying asses anyway.

The Benghazi Talking Points
And how they were changed to obscure the truth
MAY 13, 2013, VOL. 18, NO. 33 • BY STEPHEN F. HAYES

Even as the White House strove last week to move beyond questions about the Benghazi attacks of Tuesday, September 11, 2012, fresh evidence emerged that senior Obama administration officials knowingly misled the country about what had happened in the days following the assaults. The Weekly Standard has obtained a timeline briefed by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence detailing the heavy substantive revisions made to the CIA’s talking points, just six weeks before the 2012 presidential election, and additional information about why the changes were made and by whom.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/benghazi-talking-points_720543.html

as Iam mentioning right now, you are a revolving door, and I refuse to get stuck in it with you and your ignorance.


The End

"Remember Iran-Contra?" Begala asked. "Infinitely more damaging than Benghazi. The Reagan administration sold weapons to the ayatollah's regime in Tehran, then diverted some of the proceeds to the (Nicaraguan) Contras, then lied about it. The scandal paralyzed the Reagan administration for 18 months."
There were high-level resignations and criminal convictions, Begala recalled.
"There was a major joint congressional investigation, with highly publicized, televised hearings. There was a special prosecutor. It was one of the biggest scandals of the 20th century. And two years later, it had no impact on Vice President Bush's campaign."

Shit happens.

Any questions?

as Iam mentioning right now, you are a revolving door, and I refuse to get stuck in it with you and your ignorance.


The End Originally Posted by CJ7

You’re the one obeisantly kowtowing to bungling liars, CBJ7; that’s manifest ignorance!

The Benghazi Talking Points
And how they were changed to obscure the truth
http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/benghazi-talking-points_720543.html



.

"Remember Iran-Contra?" Begala asked. "Infinitely more damaging than Benghazi. The Reagan administration sold weapons to the ayatollah's regime in Tehran, then diverted some of the proceeds to the (Nicaraguan) Contras, then lied about it. The scandal paralyzed the Reagan administration for 18 months."
There were high-level resignations and criminal convictions, Begala recalled.
"There was a major joint congressional investigation, with highly publicized, televised hearings. There was a special prosecutor. It was one of the biggest scandals of the 20th century. And two years later, it had no impact on Vice President Bush's campaign."

Shit happens.

Any questions? Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

apparently the rightwingers are bound and determined to keep Obie from being reelected ...

apparently the rightwingers are bound and determined to keep Obie from being reelected ... Originally Posted by CJ7

As usual, you two libertards don't see the irony and hypocrisy of citing this incident during the Reagan administration -- an incident that was NOT worse than Benghazi: NO U.S. Ambassadors were killed! -- where the MSM and the Dimocrats BOTH conspired to shut-down and paralyze the U.S. government pursuing a libertard-political agenda.

What idiots like Corpy don't realize is that foreign terrorism attacks can happen at any time to any country for any reason ... And for no reason at all.

Please keep trying to show how these Americans are deader than other unfortunates who have perished on foreign soil. Or why faulty intel in this case was was faultier than faulty intel,in other cases ... Like 9/11.

Please beat this horse worse than you've beaten any other.

At the end of the day, you'll not only HA r nothing to ride out of here on, but nothing left to eat either.

Foreign attacks have taken place for years. if we arm our soldiers...

Domestic attacks, specifically the incessant mewling over this particular attack, can be reined in by pointing out that the posters in question bathe in their own waste.

Suffice it to say, the ignorance of the libertards in this forum is surpassed only by their kowtowing obeisance to their bumbling, lying leaders.

On September 11, 2012, the U.S. Embassy in Cairo sent much of its staff away in preparation for protesters who were to assemble outside the compound. This occurred hours before the attacks in Benghazi. The protesters in Cairo attacked the U.S. Embassy, scaled the wall and burnt a U.S. flag; again, this occurred hours before the Benghazi attack.

How did the Odumbo administration react to those attacks? It didn’t!

Odumbo, et al, didn’t alert or relocate a single military asset – no ships, no planes, no soldiers – in case the situation in Cairo went sour in a hurry. Had it done so, those assets would have been in place for ready deployment to Benghazi; thus, signifying Odumbo and HildaBeast's piss-poor-leadership.

Today, fortunately, it seems someone (NOT HildaBeast) has learned a lesson. Ready reaction teams are on alert and being positioned for deployment to Libya in preparation for a rising level of anti-Western hostility in that country.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013...n-libyan/print

You're a fucking idiot, Corpy!

Put more lives at risk with increased military posturing? How about just get the fuck out of there? Or would that be cutting and running?

As usual, you two libertards don't see the irony and hypocrisy of citing this incident during the Reagan administration -- an incident that was NOT worse than Benghazi: NO U.S. Ambassadors were killed! -- where the MSM and the Dimocrats BOTH conspired to shut-down and paralyze the U.S. government pursuing a libertard-political agenda. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Not worse? Only in the tiny cavity of your mind.


One is a single incident that lasted less than 24 hours.

The other an on-going criminal conspiracy that covered a much larger time frame and included many more players.

Reagan sold weapons to a regime that over-ran our embassy and held our citizens hostage for over a year.

Obama has been killing members of the organization that over-ran our embassy.

Score?

A shitload of deaders to 4 of ours

Reagan diverted proceeds from weapon sales to a terrorist regime, which overthrew a government friendly to the US, to a terrorist organization that was attempting to overthrow a government friendly to the US and who was responsible for killing thousands of civilians.

There have been questions raised about causes and the response timeline. Investigation still ongoing

Reagan lied about activities to joint congressional committees which resulted in numerous high level resignations and criminal convictions.

There have been some resignations. No criminal conviction as no charges have been filed.

Special prosecutor appointed.

No special prosecutor appointed.

Administration paralyzed for 18 months.

President won re-election..

One of the biggest scandals of the 20th century.

Will not rank in top 20 for 21st.

You're a fucking idiot, Corpy!

Put more lives at risk with increased military posturing? How about just get the fuck out of there? Or would that be cutting and running? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Address your concerns to the lying-ass, bumbling leader that you elected, you stupid golem fuck!

Not worse? Only in the tiny cavity of your mind.


One is a single incident that lasted less than 24 hours.

The other an on-going criminal conspiracy that covered a much larger time frame and included many more players.

Reagan sold weapons to a regime that over-ran our embassy and held our citizens hostage for over a year.

Obama has been killing members of the organization that over-ran our embassy.

Score?

A shitload of deaders to 4 of ours

Reagan diverted proceeds from weapon sales to a terrorist regime, which overthrew a government friendly to the US, to a terrorist organization that was attempting to overthrow a government friendly to the US and who was responsible for killing thousands of civilians.

There have been questions raised about causes and the response timeline. Investigation still ongoing

Reagan lied about activities to joint congressional committees which resulted in numerous high level resignations and criminal convictions.

There have been some resignations. No criminal conviction as no charges have been filed.

Special prosecutor appointed.

No special prosecutor appointed.

Administration paralyzed for 18 months.

President won re-election..

One of the biggest scandals of the 20th century

Will not rank in top 20 for 21st. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Hey, MasterDickMuncher, in case you didn't notice, Benghazi Gate is not over yet: it's still developing.

Ambassadors killed during the Odumbo Administration: 1

Ambassadors killed during the Reagan Administration: 0

Address your concerns to the lying-ass, bumbling leader that you elected, you stupid golem fuck!

I did, he told me he was waiting for you get out of the fetal (or is that fecal) position before he made another move!

Hey, MasterDickMuncher, in case you didn't notice, Benghazi Gate is not over yet: it's still developing, you mentally defective fucktard.

Well, according to your mentor, Whineaway's, screaming headline, it IS over, and Hillary is CULABLE!
Ambassadors killed during the Odumbo Administration: 1

Ambassadors killed during the Reagan Administration: 0

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Corpy Brain Cells Killed During the Reagan Administration = ALL
Corpy Brain Cells Remaining After Latest Screening of Dumbo = NONE

At least you're calling people names, you scatalogically tittilated sick fuck... even those who present thoughtful responses to your drivelous babble.