South Carolina Church Shooting

You're a fool. Is that you in your avatar? Originally Posted by Budman

Those are my nuts...thanks for noticing.

Fox News is having a very difficult time reporting on the shooting because they refuse to say it is racially motivated in any way. They are trying to push the ridicules notion that it is religious in nature

Those are my nuts...thanks for noticing. Originally Posted by WTF

So the rest of you must be up the monkey's ass.

Fox News is having a very difficult time reporting on the shooting because they refuse to say it is racially motivated in any way. They are trying to push the ridicules notion that it is religious in nature Originally Posted by BigLouie

This incident has a little something for everyone.


Jim

So the rest of you must be up the monkey's ass. Originally Posted by Budman

no I'm in a monkey suit...those are just my nuts

Fox News is having a very difficult time reporting on the shooting because they refuse to say it is racially motivated in any way. They are trying to push the ridicules notion that it is religious in nature Originally Posted by BigLouie

religion been raping his women?

The way some of you post about blacks in this forum....I know damn well there are more than a few supporters of what this guy did...or at the very least think it retribution to all this damn rioting these black folks are doing!


. Originally Posted by WTF

Let everyone be reminded that WTF is the forum's only self-admitted racist.

Fox News is having a very difficult time reporting on the shooting because they refuse to say it is racially motivated in any way. They are trying to push the ridicules notion that it is religious in nature Originally Posted by BigLouie

You are obviously not watch Fox News then.

And you wonder why nobody takes you seriously. That statement is nothing but left wing bullshit. You are a fool if you truly believe that crap.

And that's the troof. Originally Posted by Budman

Then why is it always some nutbag who's trying 'take the country back' who does shit like this? Tell me why the media refers to minorities who do this as thugs but whites who do it are 'mentally ill'? As if to say that the only reason a white person would do something like this is because they're mentally unstable, but a minority would do it on principle.

Fox News is having a very difficult time reporting on the shooting because they refuse to say it is racially motivated in any way. They are trying to push the ridicules notion that it is religious in nature Originally Posted by BigLouie

That's a hard line to take when the 9 dead are black and the one who did it is white. Good luck to them. They're viewership likes to be pissed on and told it's raining, so it's all good.

So using your reasoning all democrats are racist because Woomraider used several racial terms in his posting. You do realize that many powerful senators whom were democrats were racists right, you might have heard of Senator Byrd, Barry Goldwater, Wallace and others but it would not matter who I listed because you have drank the koolaid. What you claim is racisim is simply frustration, people are tired of the race card (your favorite card), there tired of the bullshit, the riots, the killing, the drive bys that kill 3 year olds there have been 4 this year in KC. These crimes were not committed by whites, bottom line and I could give a giant fuck if you think I am racist, bottom line, if you want to be treated with respect treat others with respect, don't walk down the middle of the fucking street and then refuse to move, don't shoot up neighborhoods, pull your fucking pants up no one wants to look at your ass, don't rape and kill 14 year old black girls and leave them lying on the ground like garbage (2 so far this year here), I was married to a black woman for 25 years, I have many many black friends and family members, I know many black men and women who are hard working, noble people with morals above reproach, but I also know a bunch of no good, thieving ass worthless walking turds, and I will call them what they are, trash. Bottom line you want to act like a civilized member of society then you will be given the respect that someone who does that deserves, you want to act like a *Staff Edit - JCM then I will call you one. To lable an entire segment of the population as racist based on their color, (you remember this is what you did when you said look at the republican convention and all you see is white people and republicans are racists) well isn't that the definition of racism. Your a fucking racist WE. You piece of shit. Originally Posted by dirty dog

He's not wrong, WE. But the bottom line is getting to the root of the problem and fixing it. We know WHAT is wrong, but we aren't fixing anything.

Then why is it always some nutbag who's trying 'take the country back' who does shit like this? Tell me why the media refers to minorities who do this as thugs but whites who do it are 'mentally ill'? As if to say that the only reason a white person would do something like this is because they're mentally unstable, but a minority would do it on principle. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Why is it you are trying to change the subject? My response had nothing to do with the idiot who killed the people in the church. That may be the overlying subject of this thread but had nothing to do with what you posted and what I responded to. This is another reason you can't be taken seriously.

Why is it you are trying to change the subject? My response had nothing to do with the idiot who killed the people in the church. That may be the overlying subject of this thread but had nothing to do with what you posted and what I responded to. This is another reason you can't be taken seriously. Originally Posted by Budman

Why is it so important that some douches on a hooker board take me seriously? And it's underlying, not overlying. I'm not trying to change the subject. A back and forth naturally ebbs and flows. So now that I've made a comment, I can no longer comment on the original subject of the thread? How does that work? Who makes up these rules, you? I posted, you responded, we're done with that. I'm not changing your mind and you're not changing mine. I understand that not all conservatives are racist. If I had to bet which political ideology has more racists though, I would put my money on them. If you feel the opposite is true, more power to you.

Why is it so important that some douches on a hooker board take me seriously? And it's underlying, not overlying. I'm not trying to change the subject. A back and forth naturally ebbs and flows. So now that I've made a comment, I can no longer comment on the original subject of the thread? How does that work? Who makes up these rules, you? I posted, you responded, we're done with that. I'm not changing your mind and you're not changing mine. I understand that not all conservatives are racist. If I had to bet which political ideology has more racists though, I would put my money on them. If you feel the opposite is true, more power to you. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Then why did you use a quote from me when you ask your question? You did it to insinuate that my quote was made in reference to some kind of support or excuse for the idiot that killed the people. You're acting like a two faced little bitch. If you want to ask a question then just ask. Don't pull in a completely unrelated quote and try to tie the two together.

If you think this guy is anything but a conservative nutbag, I've got a bridge for sale...

Here's what his roommate had to say about him;

“He was big into segregation and other stuff,” Tyler said. “He said he wanted to start a civil war. He said he was going to do something like that and then kill himself.”

Sounds like a teabagger to me Originally Posted by WombRaider

How big a scumbag do you have to be to exploit a tragedy like this one to bait people whose politics you disagree with? Just look at undercunt stumble all over himself trying to paint the perp as a "conservative". This is the same dipshit who recently gave us his own retarded definition of conservative:

Conservatism, by definition as well as nature, is about preserving the status quo. It does not possess in its nature the possibility for radical or revolutionary change. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Hey dingbat, you just quoted his roommate as saying the punk wanted to start a civil war. That sounds kind of "radical" and "revolutionary" to me. He sure doesn't sound interested in preserving the status quo. Applying your own definition, he can't be a conservative.

Nice try at stirring up trouble, undercunt. In the end you only succeed in getting your ass handed to you, as usual.

.