a Candidate For Sensativity Training

Doovie, please don’t try to speak for me. We do not agree. Nothing you say will make me change my mind. It seems that this subject is right along with other taboo subjects. For the very last time: I do not consider waterboarding torture. Two, Senate Judiciary Committee “investigations” aside, I am comfortable with the imperial data I have read that states that waterboarding is effective. And three, I have stated that I believe that waterboarding is a tool of war only. We the People are not at war with the government of the United States of America.

We simply disagree, and you and WTF will never change my mind. Did it ever occur to you that you are being as obstinate as you think I am being? I find your logic as flawed as you think mine is.

I absolutely don't agree with Trump mucking up the waters, but I do support his goading the press with regard to their egregious reluctance to report on anything Obama negative.
Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

Spoken like a true birther.

Doovie, please don’t try to speak for me. Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

Someone has to. You've posted incessantly in this thread, yet you've refused to answer some pretty basic questions, choosing instead to stick with your indefensible talking points.

For the very last time: I do not consider waterboarding torture.

Given some of your other positions, this doesn't surprise me.

Two, Senate Judiciary Committee “investigations” aside, I am comfortable with the imperial data I have read that states that waterboarding is effective.

This from the girl who doesn't believe birth certificates.

And three, I have stated that I believe that waterboarding is a tool of war only.

Only about 1000 times. But you, again, refuse to say why you think it's NOT a tool for crime fighting. If it's effective, it's effective. I don't see the problem.

We the People are not at war with the government of the United States of America.

You would be if your Governor had his way. Nevertheless, again, if it's effective and it's not torture, then i don't see any reason for not using it. As i asked, feel free to tell me why you think it would be a bad idea.

Did it ever occur to you that you are being as obstinate as you think I am being?

I know i am. I'm challenging you to defend your position, and you're refusing to. So my obstinence "is different".

I find your logic as flawed as you think mine is.

I don't find your logic flawed. I find it non-existent.

Spoken like a true birther.



Someone has to. You've posted incessantly in this thread, yet you've refused to answer some pretty basic questions, choosing instead to stick with your indefensible talking points.

Given some of your other positions, this doesn't surprise me.

This from the girl who doesn't believe birth certificates.

Only about 1000 times. But you, again, refuse to say why you think it's NOT a tool for crime fighting. If it's effective, it's effective. I don't see the problem.

You would be if your Governor had his way. Nevertheless, again, if it's effective and it's not torture, then i don't see any reason for not using it. As i asked, feel free to tell me why you think it would be a bad idea.

I know i am. I'm challenging you to defend your position, and you're refusing to. So my obstinence "is different".

I don't find your logic flawed. I find it non-existent. Originally Posted by Doove

You are being hyper-aggressive about something that we will never agree on. I think you are as unreasonable as you think I am. So Peace to you on this one.

You are being hyper-aggressive Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

Doovie can dish it out too.

I think you are as unreasonable as you think I am. So Peace to you on this one.

Alright, fine. Just for the record, i'm actually willing to be flexible. To me, it's either good for both, or it's good for neither, and to the latter i've laid out reasons why. Your position is entirely inconsistent and your logic unpersuasive.

We simply disagree, and you and WTF will never change my mind. Did it ever occur to you that you are being as obstinate as you think I am being? I find your logic as flawed as you think mine is. Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

What logic. What logic are you relying on. You heard Dick CHeney say it worked? That is not logic. That is a blind belief.

If you find that to be logic, then we need to redefine logic. You are using or better stated misusing the 'L' word. If you are going to use the 'L" word that way, then the folks who do not believe we landed on the moon are logical.

The Senate judiciary committee??? The same bunch of yahoos that brought us Ken Star and the - and really important to national security - Roger Clemens hearings? Whew! I guess it depends on what your definition of is is maybe. Someone lie to on TV to the Senate Judiciary Committee. No wait!!!! the Senate Judicary Committee broadcast made-up hearings to get a bit-a free campaign time. No WAY!

. Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

WTF kind of reasoned response is that? Did this guy lie? Are you saying that the former FBI interrogator lied.

Are you again using flawed logic. ''Somebody has lied during hearings, therefore , nobody is believable.''

If so why should anybody believe anybody. Do you have any proof that this man is a liar. Are there any question towards his credentials? If so so them and lets take a reason look at what you bring foreword. Do you think Marshall has more knowledge that this former head of counter intelligence?

If I read between the lines here, are we "agreeing to disagree?"

Ali Soufan has been completely discredited!....he was pissed at how the CIA treated him for what he did and he tried to stick it to them........ Originally Posted by Marshall

As many links as you put up , would you please give Olivia a link so she can hang her hat not on what you say over the internet but what some other nut says over the internet.

I have found nothing that discredits this man.

I have found plenty of instances where you have been discredited in just the last few weeks.

If I read between the lines here, are we "agreeing to disagree?" Originally Posted by SR Only

We are having a frank discussion on the merits of waterboarding.

I am not agreeing to disagree. If the facts come out that waterboarding is indeed effective, I will then agree with my fellow posters.

But yes one person has stated that nothing will change her mind. That person should stop posting. She has no credibility on the matter after making a statement like that.

Jesus, I may not believe in God but if he came down from the heavens I would not be so obtuse and to discount my encounter with the man/God.

, I am comfortable with the imperial data I have read that states that waterboarding is effective. Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

Would you at least give us a link?

Unlike you , my mind is always open. If in fact it works, it works.

Whether it is moral is a question that I am not intrested in. Give me the facts. I have found/read nothing showing imperial data.

This would be a first. You have scooped the so called Lame streem media. Please share.

I am thinking that re-beating the horse by all parties gains no traction.

I am thinking that re-beating the horse by all parties gains no traction. Originally Posted by SR Only

We are not beating a dead horse....Marshall is going to provide me a link showing where Ali Soulfan has been discredited and Olivia is going to link me ''imperial data I have read that states that waterboarding is effective''


Those two links could change my mind on this subject.

So please slow down there master. WTF is here to learn, not to beat a dead horse.

There is no need to try and protect them SR. They are big boys and girls. They should be able to articulate their position without interference. They have stated something and I am sure they will have no trouble providing a link.

We are not beating a dead horse....Marshall is going to provide me a link showing where Ali Soulfan has been discredited and Olivia is going to link me ''imperial data I have read that states that waterboarding is effective''


Those two links could change my mind on this subject.

So please slow down there master. WTF is here to learn, not to beat a dead horse.

There is no need to try and protect them SR. They are big boys and girls. They should be able to articulate their position without interference. They have stated something and I am sure they will have no trouble providing a link. Originally Posted by WTF

You have all the links you need.......you link to Ali Soufan's opening statement, but you don't link to his questioning by the Senators nor do you link to their Senate report. Also, you choose to ignore the other witnesses on the subject during that hearing.

Take a look at what was going on in May 2009. That was the period of time Barry was making an issue of enhanced interrogation.
Ali Soufan appearance was all Barry-driven [the Chicago Way]

Stop being lazy and read the material.

I am thinking that re-beating the horse by all parties gains no traction. Originally Posted by SR Only

I love that emoticon! I never saw that one before......PETA may have a problem with it though..........

That's why no pics and video from the helmet cams. Originally Posted by gnadfly

I love the "we didn't have video for 20-25 minutes" excuse!

Also, they had to claim that the historical situation room photo was staged!

HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! Barry & Co. are a joke, unfortunately the joke is on us.................

If i'm waterboarded, i'm squealing like a pig. Originally Posted by Doove

The Defense rests your honor! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!