eccie moderators and staff, fair and balanced

You don't see it because you aren't a shit-stirrer. Some people just can't wait to get others in trouble. It's like that tattletale you couldn't stand in the third grade. Originally Posted by BeardFist McFistBeard

God I hate tattletales, can't stand where they are in life so they try to ruin others. Someone needs some chocolate...and Depends.

Here's a NCNS review, where nothing happened just like this one, and it's in the review section. How come it stays and the one that started this thread gets moved?

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=742892

Here's a NCNS review, where nothing happened just like this one, and it's in the review section. How come it stays and the one that started this thread gets moved?

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=742892 Originally Posted by BeardFist McFistBeard

nice find... a 10 month old review. Had too search hard for that one. How much time did you spend looking for it?

I have it under good authority, the moderators don't actually read every post. They are not full time. and if no one hit the RTM button, they would not go to look at it. You should make it your job to find all those posts and report them to the moderators It's time for you to be of service here.



Or it was a conspiracy? You see BP Katy, who obsesses over reviews on this site but isn't even a member. So she contacts a local mod because she knows how to reach the staff members.

The staff member she reached was also was a former client and was pissed off at her because she was one shot on goal only and would not bare back him. So to get back at her, he violated policy and left the NCNS review in the review section.

Boy he really showed her. But he just didn't count on an obsessed hobbyist to catch that one and put 2 and 2 together and come up with the square root of Pi.

Sorry, Mr. Moderator, you have been busted for using the boards for your own agenda and ruining this poor backpage girls entire career. She is probably flipping burgers at Dairy Queen now.

I am sure an administrator will alert the owners and after a full scale investigation play hobby police and slap an ambassador tag on him so he can never do that again.

You might even get a medal.

Here's a NCNS review, where nothing happened just like this one, and it's in the review section. How come it stays and the one that started this thread gets moved?

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=742892 Originally Posted by BeardFist McFistBeard

I think a lot of the older reviews got grandfathered in and left where they were originally posted. If memory serves me correctly this was changed less than 6 months ago.

I am the guilty party. I was still new here when I posted that and did not know the rules on NCNS. I don't give a rip whether they keep the "review" here or not. But I find it fascinating that a member who did not like my comments when I commented on a thread asking about her has a 10 month old memory about my "review". Especially when said member has joined others in discussions accusing others of being WKs. Interesting.

nice find... a 10 month old review. Had too search hard for that one. How much time did you spend looking for it?

I have it under good authority, the moderators don't actually read every post. They are not full time. and if no one hit the RTM button, they would not go to look at it. You should make it your job to find all those posts and report them to the moderators It's time for you to be of service here.



Or it was a conspiracy? You see BP Katy, who obsesses over reviews on this site but isn't even a member. So she contacts a local mod because she knows how to reach the staff members.

The staff member she reached was also was a former client and was pissed off at her because she was one shot on goal only and would not bare back him. So to get back at her, he violated policy and left the NCNS review in the review section.

Boy he really showed her. But he just didn't count on an obsessed hobbyist to catch that one and put 2 and 2 together and come up with the square root of Pi.

Sorry, Mr. Moderator, you have been busted for using the boards for your own agenda and ruining this poor backpage girls entire career. She is probably flipping burgers at Dairy Queen now.

I am sure an administrator will alert the owners and after a full scale investigation play hobby police and slap an ambassador tag on him so he can never do that again.

You might even get a medal.

Originally Posted by Glenn Quagmire

Didn't have to look at all. The reviewer mentioned the NCNS in a thread very recently. It's not a conspiracy, it's a question.

I am the guilty party. I was still new here when I posted that and did not know the rules on NCNS. I don't give a rip whether they keep the "review" here or not. But I find it fascinating that a member who did not like my comments when I commented on a thread asking about her has a 10 month old memory about my "review". Especially when said member has joined others in discussions accusing others of being WKs. Interesting. Originally Posted by watchoutthegameisrigged

It's not interesting at all. Well, I guess it is if you've got nothing better to do than whinge about. You mentioned the review very recently and then the whole thing with Carmen came up about NCNS reviews being moved. I wondered if yours had been moved, it hadn't. It isn't a knock on you, it's the uneven treatment by those in power. You made your point, you only get one chance a month if that, I'd be pissed too. I get a chance anytime I want, so I have a different opinion on the matter, based on my personal experience. I simply tried to provide a counterpoint to your mention that she NCNS you almost a year ago and that maybe your attitude about it is based on you not having many opportunities. You didn't provide any perspective. Is that ok? Can I have a different view than you, without you getting all 'I find it fascinating' and whatnot? There's so much shit that goes on behind the scenes here and THIS is what you choose to make a stand on?

"Make a stand on"? Dude, you take this stuff way too seriously. I make stands on things truly important, not what goes on on hooker boards. I have no idea why the "review" was left where it was and really don't care what they do with it. And my attitude on ncns would not change no matter how many opportunities I had. It's simple courtesy.

"Make a stand on"? Dude, you take this stuff way too seriously. I make stands on things truly important, not what goes on on hooker boards. I have no idea why the "review" was left where it was and really don't care what they do with it. And my attitude on ncns would not change no matter how many opportunities I had. It's simple courtesy. Originally Posted by watchoutthegameisrigged

Things that go on affect people in their actual lives or don't you get that? It wasn't about you. Could have been anyone. I just wanted an answer to a simple question. As for NCNS, that's part of the game. You're cutting of your nose to spite your face. They'll all do it eventually, then who've you got? You've for no problem making a stand accusing me and others of being WK

You wrote earlier of me having "better things to do". You are right, I do have better things to do than argue with you about how I should view a ncns situation. I'm out. You win.

Wrote a small book but has better things to do, when does it start? Roflmao

You wrote earlier of me having "better things to do". You are right, I do have better things to do than argue with you about how I should view a ncns situation. I'm out. You win. Originally Posted by watchoutthegameisrigged

You're missing the point. It's not about winning or losing. It was never personal. I saw an opportunity to hopefully get an answer, that's all. You can take it personally but it wasn't that way at all

I am not taking it personal dude. Trust me on that one.

I thought it started ,,,,

I am not taking it personal dude. Trust me on that one. Originally Posted by watchoutthegameisrigged

I want to believe you, but actions indicate the opposite. I really hope you aren't.

Seriously, I'm not. I don't care that you used that "review" to make a point about board policies concerning ncns "reviews" and I do get your point in that regard. I have no idea why that "review" is still there. But my mind is not open to be charitable on an actual ncns.