It frees things up for me, and hell this is FUN. Originally Posted by DirkDigglerSanAntonio
that was the unfortunate part about her being banned. it was kind of funny to see her post moar stupid shit like her dopey olympics challenge and for her to think me and whispers would take that shit seriously.Exactly.
she's the pandora's box of comedic material. the more she let out, the moar lulz we had to come up with.
and now with her wk's treating her getting banned like as if she's Nelson Mandela or some shit.
Condemned to some sort of wrongful imprisonment by this oppressive regime. Lol, the regime she once defended no less!
Originally Posted by savak
Hmmmm. lets see. You speak for her, you advertise for her, you are attempting to drum up business for her.I'll keep it civil. I believe you were trying to show some tough love in your posts and offer advice so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you mean well. There is no quid pro quo with G here that could be considered pimping or managing. I think you're reaching just to antagonize by saying so... None of us speak for her either. It's a very tenuous association you're trying to make... For example, you have two of you three reviews of bailey, a great provider and gal and your YES reviews are very complimentary. How would you feel or react if others wanted to attack her?
If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, guess what??? It is most likely a duck.
Thank YOU for playing Originally Posted by DirkDigglerSanAntonio
I am still awaiting a response why Netx9 can post a picture of her intoxicating vagina on her review. (intoxicating as in, obviously it has powers over weak minded people, that will make them just go crazy over a ban on a hooker board) Hell I love a picture of a nice pussy as much as anyone else, but he was indeed being the Eccie Police yesterday, and last I knew those types of pics were not allowed in the public areas. Originally Posted by DirkDigglerSanAntonioI did respond with my assessment and agreement to oblige with any staff action they deem....
Not really... I've seen similar images on this site on forums and showcases...
From the eccie image standards...
The Latin term genitalia, sometimes anglicized as "genital area" , is used to describe the externally visible sex organs, known as primary genitalia or external genitalia: in males, the penis and scrotum; and in females, the clitoris and vulva.
Vertical smile is one thing, but neither anatomical elements are exposed. Let me illustrate... A horizontal smile...
An "exposed" smile....
Just because you see a smile doesn't mean you see the tongue... Or just because you see butt cheeks, doesn't mean you see sphincter! I would say the picture is indirect - we can certainly debate 'exposed'.
Anyway, like I said, I've seen similar images and if a mod, as is their discretion, want it removed or replaced, I wouldn't object. There are plenty more other pictures I could put up.
Feel free to rtm it if you are offended and I'll defer to the staff judgement. See how easy that can be? Originally Posted by Netx9
I'll keep it civil. I believe you were trying to show some tough love in your posts and offer advice so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you mean well. There is no quid pro quo with G here that could be considered pimping or managing. I think you're reaching just to antagonize by saying so... None of us speak for her either. It's a very tenuous association you're trying to make... For example, you have two of you three reviews of bailey, a great provider and gal and your YES reviews are very complimentary. How would you feel or react if others wanted to attack her?If others want to attack Bailey, have at it! I would certainly not come to anyones defense in a case where they brought it on themselves. Would you come to the defense of a Chiropractor you PAID for a service, that went off and did something stupid to be news worthy or Forum worthy?
As for drumming up business for G, aren't you guilty of the same thing then? From:
http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=971759
You're expressing interest and support for a lady you've seen and enjoyed. Be careful throwing around the word "hypocritical"... I do think you meant well in the beginning. Hope you can get back there.
Originally Posted by Netx9
Awwww I missed quoting your original statement and I so wanted to point out your reading comprhension skills again better luck next time Originally Posted by a10bombI am very sorry about my typo, was in Costco getting some office supplies replying on the phone.
Wasnt trying to bait you, just pointing out similarities that contradict your accusations. You and I disagree on whether the chiropractor did something stupid and that can be debated. Impugning motives of those who feel that way is just simply ad hominem - and our actions don't violate any guidelines. If they do, rtm it and I'll defer to staff judgement and take my warnings or points.She didn't piss me off. Still not pissed off. I just have zero respect for hypocrites. How could me posting something within a review tie into this? Why are you bringing non related topics into this? As I have stated and I will state again. I mentioned a post made in Mens Lounge, and did not mention it directly. I did not disclose any information from that post, UNLIKE SLAVE G. If the post was about Skittles, I simply said "remember that post about skittles?" Yep got a rules infraction and learned a lesson, don't even vaguely bring up anything in Mens Lounge.
As for bailey, I have nothing but praise for her and have said as much in my reviews - just pointing out how you engaged in similar supportive content in your reviews
I get it, she pissed you off - I just don't think that justifies insulting others who are supportive of her because you disagree. Not too big for my britches... If I break a rule, so be it - I'll take my medicine.
Just a note... I never went after you directly - just said I thought you exposed your own ML content - and a mod agreed. How am I that bad guy in that calculus? Originally Posted by Netx9