Snowden

I'm a liar because I proved you wrong? Learn English Mr. Immigrant.
Oh, and I love your cut and paste string of projected traits. I would add stupid to that. Because they are projected and you won't admit you are stupid, you leave that out.
You're busted.


The argument isn't double edged, dull knife. It only takes one republican out of all of them to do a filibuster. 1. Uno.
It's your premise that they could force a law with less than 60 votes and your premise some republican might jump ship.
Why do I say your premise? Because between you and me, you're the only one who brought them up.

You're acting stupid again. ACA votes have nothing to do with possible votes for another bill.
"On December 23, the Senate voted 60–39 to end debate on the bill: a cloture vote to end the filibuster by opponents. The bill then passed by a vote of 60–39 on December 24, 2009, with all Democrats and two independents voting for, and all Republicans voting against (except for Jim Bunning, who did not vote).[102] The bill was endorsed by the AMA and AARP.[103]"
Did you read that? 58 democrats and 2 independents. They negotiated with the independents for their votes. Why did they do that? Post #8 says;
"Remind me, when did the democrats have a congress with the votes to over ride a veto or make it past a filibuster needed to repeal a law?
That's right. They didn't."

I saw the victor in the mirror. You have been schooled again.

"Remind me, when did the democrats have a congress with the votes to over ride a veto or make it past a filibuster needed to repeal a law?
That's right. They didn't."

"You are one stupid motherfucker.

The statement was "the democrats", not "the democrats and independents" or "the democrats and some republicans".

And you know it.

You've been given the chance to bow out with some honor. You didn't want honor.
You've been bitch-slapped to the point the refs stopped the fight days ago and went home. You think you can win because my hand will hurt too much to keep hitting you. It won't."

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

To repeal the Patriot Act the dim-retards need only to have passed one law despite any Republican opposition, MasterDickMuncher. The dim-retards proved that they could pass that one law when they passed Odumbocare; thus, proving absolutely the dim-retards had the votes to repeal the Patriot Act, MasterDickMuncher -- and proving that you're a congenital liar, MasterDickMuncher.

To repeal the Patriot Act the dim-retards need only to have passed one law despite any Republican opposition, MasterDickMuncher. The dim-retards proved that they could pass that one law when they passed Odumbocare; thus, proving absolutely the dim-retards had the votes to repeal the Patriot Act, This proves absolutely that you can't fix stupid. Your premise is once voted with the democrats, always must vote with democrats.
Thanks for the insight into your "logic" that all of your posts depend on.
MasterDickMuncher -- and proving that you're a congenital liar, MasterDickMuncher. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

There were 58 democrats, not 60. They proved they needed independents to hit 60 votes to achieve cloture. They did on ACA. That doesn't mean they could anytime they wanted.

If that were the case, you were lucky you only got ACA. They could have passed gun control, abortion, even for you. They could have passed every item on their social agenda.
Repeal the Patriot Act? When you could do anything you wanted? That's stupid.

Wrong IritableBowelSyndrome.

So very wrong.

Jesus tap dancing Christ IBIdiot! Are you still squealing about having you ass handed to you? You seem to be doing that in a number of threads now...

Not lying any less. Not citing any more facts. Just gnashing your gums!

This proves absolutely that you can't fix stupid. Your premise is once voted with the democrats, always must vote with democrats.
Thanks for the insight into your "logic" that all of your posts depend on.
There were 58 democrats, not 60. They proved they needed independents to hit 60 votes to achieve cloture. They did on ACA. That doesn't mean they could anytime they wanted.

If that were the case, you were lucky you only got ACA. They could have passed gun control, abortion, even for you. They could have passed every item on their social agenda.
Repeal the Patriot Act? When you could do anything you wanted? That's stupid.

Wrong IritableBowelSyndrome.

So very wrong.
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Odumbocare proves you're stupidly wrong and stupidly lying and that the dim-retards did have the votes to repeal the Patriot Act, MasterDickMuncher.

Jesus tap dancing Christ IBIdiot! Are you still squealing about having you ass handed to you? You seem to be doing that in a number of threads now...

Not lying any less. Not citing any more facts. Just gnashing your gums! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Jesus tap dancing Christ IBIdiot! Are you still squealing about having you ass handed to you? You seem to be doing that in a number of threads now...

Not lying any less. Not citing any more facts. Just gnashing your gums! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

That would be a big AFFIRMATIVE!

I will say it again.

You just go on believing in your master, mastermanmunccher.
When our government continues, and is supported by the President, in violating the Constitution he is sworn to uphold and defend, it does not matter from which party he or she comes, the public with or without the support of our elected representatives should rise up and expose them for what they are. Snowden did his job as a citizen. The President should do his job as required under his oath of office.

We all know the President will not do this as he hold the Constitution in contempt as well as the people that support it.

As to Snowden, when the government is violating the Constitution and claims they can do it because of "
national security" yet denies they are doing it and a man has eviidence it is happening. It is the duty of the citizen regardless to expose the violation by the government of the law. When we allow the government to violate the law, where will we draw the line and say enough is enough.
I f I am the government and I am violating the law, I would think that I would do everything I could to discredit those that would expose me. All the government had to do was listen to him and stop what they were doing but it seems that a single citizen has no power when it come s to the monster this government has become.

Of course we all know that the NSA would lose some funding and a lot of people that are getting extremely rich by spying on the citizens of these United States of America would do everything in their power to put a stop to anything that would expose them.

I will say it again.

You just go on believing in your master, mastermanmunccher.
When our government continues, and is supported by the President, in violating the Constitution he is sworn to uphold and defend, it does not matter from which party he or she comes, the public with or without the support of our elected representatives should rise up and expose them for what they are. Snowden did his job as a citizen. The President should do his job as required under his oath of office.

We all know the President will not do this as he hold the Constitution in contempt as well as the people that support it.

As to Snowden, when the government is violating the Constitution and claims they can do it because of "
national security" yet denies they are doing it and a man has eviidence it is happening. It is the duty of the citizen regardless to expose the violation by the government of the law. When we allow the government to violate the law, where will we draw the line and say enough is enough.
I f I am the government and I am violating the law, I would think that I would do everything I could to discredit those that would expose me. All the government had to do was listen to him and stop what they were doing but it seems that a single citizen has no power when it come s to the monster this government has become.

Of course we all know that the NSA would lose some funding and a lot of people that are getting extremely rich by spying on the citizens of these United States of America would do everything in their power to put a stop to anything that would expose them. Originally Posted by The2Dogs

+1

Odumbocare proves you're stupidly wrong and stupidly lying and that the dim-retards did have the votes to repeal the Patriot Act, MasterDickMuncher.





Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Originally Posted by I B Hankering
To repeal the Patriot Act the dim-retards need only to have passed one law despite any Republican opposition, MasterDickMuncher. The dim-retards proved that they could pass that one law when they passed Odumbocare; thus, proving absolutely the dim-retards had the votes to repeal the Patriot Act, This proves absolutely that you can't fix stupid. Your premise is once voted with the democrats, always must vote with democrats.
Thanks for the insight into your "logic" that all of your posts depend on.
MasterDickMuncher -- and proving that you're a congenital liar, MasterDickMuncher.
There were 58 democrats, not 60. They proved they needed independents to hit 60 votes to achieve cloture. They did on ACA. That doesn't mean they could anytime they wanted.

If that were the case, you were lucky you only got ACA. They could have passed gun control, abortion, even for you. They could have passed every item on their social agenda.
Repeal the Patriot Act? When you could do anything you wanted? That's stupid.

Wrong IritableBowelSyndrome.

So very wrong.

You are talking like the Democrats would repeal the Patriot Act if they could. They wouldn't even consider it. It passed and gets extensions with overwhelming bipartisan support. The Dems and Reps ALWAYS work together to limit freedom and consolidate power.

You are talking like the Democrats would repeal the Patriot Act if they could. They wouldn't even consider it. It passed and gets extensions with overwhelming bipartisan support. The Dems and Reps ALWAYS work together to limit freedom and consolidate power. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Not sure where you got that idea. This whole thing, at this point, is about the dems being able to unilaterally pass legislation that would repeal the Patriot Act while they had a majority in both chambers and the Presidency. IBSlow says the dems could have repealed the Act at any time because the independents, after many concessions from the dems, voted for the ACA for a total of 60 votes in the Senate. The number needed for cloture. There is no guarantee that the independents, especially with Joe Lieberman as one, would vote to repeal the Patriot Act. Without 60 votes the replacement bill may never get a vote.
Those are the straight forward rules of the Senate. Maybe or might were not part of the equation. It was always they had many chances. When Bush was President, that meant having 2/3 of both chambers to over-ride a veto. With Obama, simple majorities would be enough except for a filibuster that could keep the bill from being voted on by the simple majority. 60 votes are needed and the dems never had 60 votes. The statement was always just the dems, not the dems and the indies together. Pretty straight forward.

As far as the actual Act goes, I haven't heard any rumbling one way or the other. I don't think they would do anything other than amend it if the need for some change comes up.

You are talking like the Democrats would repeal the Patriot Act if they could. They wouldn't even consider it. It passed and gets extensions with overwhelming bipartisan support. The Dems and Reps ALWAYS work together to limit freedom and consolidate power. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

+1

This proves absolutely that you can't fix stupid. Your premise is once voted with the democrats, always must vote with democrats.
Thanks for the insight into your "logic" that all of your posts depend on.

There were 58 democrats, not 60.

They proved they needed independents to hit 60 votes to achieve cloture. They did on ACA. That doesn't mean they could anytime they wanted.

If that were the case, you were lucky you only got ACA. They could have passed gun control, abortion, even for you. They could have passed every item on their social agenda.
Repeal the Patriot Act? When you could do anything you wanted? That's stupid.

Wrong IritableBowelSyndrome.

So very wrong.

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

You’re the cock-sucking ignoramus that claimed that the dim-retards couldn’t pass a law against Republican obstructionism, MasterDickMuncher, and Odumbocare proves you are a stupid and congenital liar, MasterDickMuncher!

You are talking like the Democrats would repeal the Patriot Act if they could. They wouldn't even consider it. It passed and gets extensions with overwhelming bipartisan support. The Dems and Reps ALWAYS work together to limit freedom and consolidate power. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

That’s exactly what MasterDickmuncher insinuated when he claimed the dim-retards never had enough votes!

You’re the cock-sucking ignoramus that claimed that the dim-retards couldn’t pass a law against Republican obstructionism, MasterDickMuncher, and Odumbocare proves you are a stupid and congenital liar, MasterDickMuncher!



That’s exactly what MasterDickmuncher insinuated when he claimed the dim-retards never had enough votes!
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Again, you're taking things out of context and lying, IBIdiot.

Why not just quit posting shit like this? It's a waste of everybody's time.

I STILL don't see anybody but Slobbrin rushing to your defense.

Stupid. Ignorant. GED-dropout. Arrogant. Narcissistic.

Yes. These are ALL you, IBIDiot.

GIVE IT A REST, FOR CHRIST'S SAKE!

Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Odumbocare proves you're stupidly wrong and stupidly lying and that the dim-retards did have the votes to repeal the Patriot Act, MasterDickMuncher.






Originally Posted by I B Hankering
To repeal the Patriot Act the dim-retards need only to have passed one law despite any Republican opposition, MasterDickMuncher. The dim-retards proved that they could pass that one law when they passed Odumbocare; thus, proving absolutely the dim-retards had the votes to repeal the Patriot Act, This proves absolutely that you can't fix stupid. Your premise is once voted with the democrats, always must vote with democrats.
Thanks for the insight into your "logic" that all of your posts depend on.
MasterDickMuncher -- and proving that you're a congenital liar, MasterDickMuncher.
There were 58 democrats, not 60. They proved they needed independents to hit 60 votes to achieve cloture. They did on ACA. That doesn't mean they could anytime they wanted.

If that were the case, you were lucky you only got ACA. They could have passed gun control, abortion, even for you. They could have passed every item on their social agenda.
Repeal the Patriot Act? When you could do anything you wanted? That's stupid.

Wrong IritableBowelSyndrome.

So very wrong.

You’re the cock-sucking ignoramus that claimed that the dim-retards couldn’t pass a law against Republican obstructionism, MasterDickMuncher, and Odumbocare proves you are a stupid and congenital liar, MasterDickMuncher!



That’s exactly what MasterDickmuncher insinuated when he claimed the dim-retards never had enough votes!
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Getting sog on your side just makes it more obvious you're wrong. Just because he can't comprehend the issue any better than you doesn't make both of you right.
Adding 2bitches is funny. He said they could change the Patriot Act whenever they wanted to, too.
Just because 3 douche-bags say a lie doesn't make it anything other than a lie.
But y'all knew that.

You're trying to change it so you aren't wrong. And that's not going to happen.

It was always the democrats by themselves couldn't get the Patriot Act repealed. You bring up a bill that would not have passed if the dems didn't have help from the indies.
Everyone knows that.

Forcing you into "cut and paste with nothing new to add" is frosting on the "Forcing IBStupid to go fetal" cake.

We can hear you from here. Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooo