My second no review and why you shouldn't be so quick to judge.

Two people were there, were you LD?

I heard both sides, she didn't insult him in her original post, I don't blame her for being upset by the comments made in that review. No one deserves to be called the names that she was called by people who had never seen her, and were just taking him at his word because he is "Spiceitup," they hadn't even heard her side yet.

Not everyone is "street wise." Every day in welcome wagon there are "18" year olds popping up and every day I see guys welcome them like moths to a flame. I remember what it's like to be 18...this is not the place for an 18 year old or even 25, but I know I'll never get people who are only thinking of their own best interest to agree with me.

Oh and PS most of the chicks running around talking about oh he's on my DNS list or I don't like the way he posts so on a "no see" list are usually the ones that don't have to worry about it because nobody's knocking down their door anyhow. Just throwing that in there. Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne

Throw out whatever you like LD, it won't change the reality.


~

I'd be willing to bet money she was on the rag during the session. Either way, he was hustled (in more ways than one).

Two people were there, were you LD?
. Originally Posted by Lexieinhouston

I didn't have to be there (and neither did you BTW)., I read his side of story , and I read hers. She never disputed what he said, and he did call her any names.

As my mama would say: Put your big girl panties on..

Old enough and "wise" enough to travel and sell pussy, but not to take criticis, pick apart what is true or not, adapt and move on?

Sounds legit.

I never trashed her nor will I. I would have simply written my review and let it fade off into the ether were it not for her starting this thread. The idea that I will be negatively impacted by a negative review I wrote is ludicrous. There are a great number of truly excellent providers who are unconcerned with what other ladies are doing and are only concerned with their own business. You and I both know that the vast majority of ladies never look at these forums, and were they to look they would find me being courteous and respectful as I have continued to be.


My comment about the Houston Effect was not gloating it was directed at my fellow inmates in the asylum and their reception of this thread in comparison to a similar one in Dallas. Though I do not understand why she has not returned to discuss if that was her intent.

My goal was free exchange of information, which is the whole the purpose of reviews, not to negatively impact her business. I wish her well and have no doubt that as many men will be drawn to her by the things mentioned in my review as were turned off by it. Which, by the way, I also said in my review and in the public commentary. Originally Posted by SpiceItUp

She had every right to start a thread and defend her reputation, especially in light of the nasty remarks that followed ROS that she was unable to see.

You're right, most providers don't read the coeds because most can't stomach how ladies are treated here and the every day garbage, however, MANY DO read a gent's reviews prior to accepting them as a new client and look very intently and the no's, just as any guy would.



~

I have a couple of questions for you Spicyone: Why didn't you move things along when she was talking for 50 mins or inquire as to why her panties where on? Go along with the bbbj, rules, etc. and then leave without voicing your opinion, etc.?

I understand why you were pissed in the beginning, but it seems to me you are not totally without fault here...she publicly offered to return your entire amount, but you refused instead choosing to keep trashing her in this thread and patting yourself on the back and relishing in the locker room towel pops.

You're a hobby veteran...she's a young 25 year old...who really got the better of whom?



Originally Posted by Lexieinhouston

The ladies can't read the ROS, yes he gave his side of the story and as I said, I do understand his side, but I get really tired of older members of this board expecting 19 to 25 year olds to act like they are seasoned pros, then coming on here and trashing these YOUNG girls without a second thought or remembrance as to what it was like to be their age. Do I condone a scammer, NO...but she publicly offered to give his money back and he is now acting like his real goal was just to show some devious side of her, when I do not believe that was the case...husband or not.

Listen, I have my share of fans who know that what I post is sincere and not meant in a malicious way, so I can afford to say what's on my mind. I just think you guys don't realize the impact of your words & actions sometimes.


~ Originally Posted by Lexieinhouston

You have tried to blame him for the failure of the session 6 or 7 times on this thread and it is utter bullshit. Each time you learn more and see that your reason is invalid, you find another excuse for her.

Are you not smart enough to see that the only way he was going to fuck her during this session was if he physically forced her to? I cannot believe that you would actually advocate that. The guy is sitting there with a ragging hard-on and she refuses to fuck and you think he needs to voice his displeasure when leaving? What kind of an idiot wouldn't know he was disappointed by that?

Your comments about the impact of the "no" review are stupid and harmful to the intent of this board. You are trying to discourage accurate, tactful reviews. That's bullshit. Also, the guys you actually do say and do horrible things to providers have no problem getting appointments so Spice will just be fine.

She had every right to start a thread and defend her reputation, especially in light of the nasty remarks that followed ROS that she was unable to see.

You're right, most providers don't read the coeds because most can't stomach how ladies are treated here and the every day garbage, however, MANY DO read a gent's reviews prior to accepting them as a new client and look very intently and the no's, just as any guy would.



~
Originally Posted by Lexieinhouston

Just to be clear, do you think he should have given her a "yes" recommendation? If you're researching a guy and sees that gave a $320/hr provider a "no" recommendation because she refused to provide services beyond a blowjob, would you really think "that is a bad man and I do not want to see him"?

wasn't planning to chime in again but I do not think SpiceItUp did anything other than provide his opinion and some facts which he is entitled to do.

all the bashing, bad remarks, and just general distaste with her are from others in the Houston community. SpiceItUp can't control the rest of us anymore than he could those panties during the appointment in question. so I really don't understand taking issue with him directly. I agree none of us were there but they provide their opinions and the Colosseum mob decides.

my opinion, she was trying to sway the mob which rarely works. I mean come on! she posted with a second account. can you argue that? (or she had her husband do it) can anyone justify that account chiming in? (I'd be happy to learn something new if this is another situation I would never think of)

secondly, look at the facts that we know. we know he paid her right? they both agree on that. then ask yourself, do you REALLY think SpiceItUp handed this girl money JUST to write a very similar 'NO' review to match up with her existing 'NO' review? do we think he was just THAT bored and that wealthy? does he have a history of this? and I think we can agree they didn't know each other so what would his motive be? I hardly think this is Law & Order and SpiceItUp has some third cousin she did wrong in Dallas he's getting revenge for. (feel free to confess if it's so SpiceItUp)

You have tried to blame him for the failure of the session 6 or 7 times on this thread and it is utter bullshit. Each time you learn more and see that your reason is invalid, you find another excuse for her.

Are you not smart enough to see that the only way he was going to fuck her during this session was if he physically forced her to? I cannot believe that you would actually advocate that. The guy is sitting there with a ragging hard-on and she refuses to fuck and you think he needs to voice his displeasure when leaving? What kind of an idiot wouldn't know he was disappointed by that?

Your comments about the impact of the "no" review are stupid and harmful to the intent of this board. You are trying to discourage accurate, tactful reviews. That's bullshit. Also, the guys you actually do say and do horrible things to providers have no problem getting appointments so Spice will just be fine. Originally Posted by BFCjosh

Bingo

Old enough and "wise" enough to travel and sell pussy, but not to take criticis, pick apart what is true or not, adapt and move on? Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne

+1

...AND CHARGE A PREMIUM, and expect to be able to play the "YOUNG AND INEXPERIENCED CARD?"

Yummy does not condone this type of behavior or sympathy for it.

FTR, while unprofessional for a lady at her rate level, I don't think her intentions were malicious. I don't condone the nasty comments either, but at the same time, this is an "information exchange" website, and opinions run rampid, which is not a bad thing. From what I understand his review was fair and objective. The rude comments were not his to apologize for. Positive and negative comments come with the territory of membership, and like a duck, we providers have to learn to let the negatives roll off our backs.

I have a couple of questions for you Spicyone: Why didn't you move things along when she was talking for 50 mins or inquire as to why her panties where on? Go along with the bbbj, rules, etc. and then leave without voicing your opinion, etc.?

I understand why you were pissed in the beginning, but it seems to me you are not totally without fault here...she publicly offered to return your entire amount, but you refused instead choosing to keep trashing her in this thread and patting yourself on the back and relishing in the locker room towel pops.

You're a hobby veteran...she's a young 25 year old...who really got the better of whom?

Originally Posted by Lexieinhouston

[COLOR="Blue"]The ladies can't read the ROS, yes he gave his side of the story and as I said, I do understand his side, but I get really tired of older members of this board expecting 19 to 25 year olds to act like they are seasoned pros, then coming on here and trashing these YOUNG girls without a second thought or remembrance as to what it was like to be their age. Do I condone a scammer, NO...but she publicly offered to give his money back and he is now acting like his real goal was just to show some devious side of her, when I do not believe that was the case...husband or not.

~ Originally Posted by Lexieinhouston

Isn't moving the session towards creating that moment/atmosphere of passion the providers job? Sure we play a role in it but isn't that the business the ladies are selling especial at her rate? If he wanted a quick lay and mediocre service he could've just went the BP route but he opted to up his dollar for a supposed better experience and ended dissatisfied which is why he gave his recommendation.

Any well established provider's age bracket should have nothing to do with performance. Any provider asking her rate regardless of what it is should work to earn it.

Also sometimes it's not about the money we all know its a gamble so sometimes we just say fuck it and charge it to the game then move on. it's just easier that way sometimes..

I hope this thread is meeting Christina's expectations.

... opinions run rampid ... Originally Posted by YummyMarie

Rampid? I kinda like it!

.... chicks running around talking about oh he's on my DNS list or I don't like the way he posts so on a "no see" list .... Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne

Thanks for the new threAD idea, LD

FTR, while unprofessional for a lady at her rate level, I don't think her intentions were malicious. I don't condone the nasty comments either, but at the same time, this is an "information exchange" website, and opinions run rampid, which is not a bad thing. From what I understand his review was fair and objective. The rude comments were not his to apologize for. Positive and negative comments come with the territory of membership, and like a duck, we providers have to learn to let the negatives roll off our backs. Originally Posted by YummyMarie

Echo echo echo....are you reading my thoughts or something..

Hey SpiceItUp! Please please please take her up on that offer to refund your money and let us know how she responds. Pretty please.

(anyone want to wager me she'll give him back even a dime?)