Well, my opinion on this may not be so popular...
*Assuming* that the movie was an accurate account, I have mixed feelings about this guy. He was a very good shot, and a brave soldier, no doubt about that. He protected the US soldiers, and for that he does deserve respect.
However... I don't see this guy as a hero, as being a hero requires more than being a brave soldier. It requires equally honorable behavior off the battle field. This man should not have married, as he neglected his wife and baby to the point that it infuriated me... again, this is assuming that the movie was accurate.
On his wedding day, he's told he's being deployed, and he tells his wife it's a package deal, meaning with him comes his fellow soldiers and the war. I guess this is ok, but it would have been nice if he'd told her that fighting this war was going to take precedence over her and his baby, before marrying her. I do realize that the war affected him mentally, but he was all gung ho to go from the get go.
He kept getting sent home, and kept choosing to go back. His wife BEGGED him to stop going back, to stay home with his new family, but for reasons only he will ever know, he chose the war over them, even after seeing that it was breaking his wife's heart. Perhaps he thought that his presence in the war was going to change something, and if he did think this, he was either a narcissist or delusional. He *could* have stayed home with his family, as he'd already done enough.
He decided to go home for good when he couldn't take the combat anymore, and even when he got home, he *still* chose spending time with the military, training snipers, over time with his family... and ultimately this is what got him killed.
I am not a supporter of this war, as nothing is ever going to change in the middle east, and admittedly this may be influencing my opinion. However, even if it is, that doesn't change the fact that this guy was a great soldier, a true patriot, but he was also a shitty husband.
I guess I've been wanting a forum to rant a bit. Before any of you hate on me too much, remember that I did give him credit where due, but I can not go along with calling him a hero.
Originally Posted by oldhiway
old I'm not sure if you've ever met or are close to someone who's served in a combat environment its a life changing experience mostly traumatic. Shooting woman/children and mutilation are things we don't hear much of here in the US because we are sheltered so needless to say dealing with that stuff is life changing. It seems to me that you would get a much better understanding of his purpose by reading the book rather than relying on a hollywood film.
I served in Iraq and unfortunately it was a tough time for the first batch of us but that sense of brother hood and commitment to each other is something you never let go and Kyle's story is excellent at demonstrating that.
jst my opinion.
AND the armed services agree with me actually.
you don't serve, then write books or movie royaltys
for profit off the deeds you did in service.
IMO it is dishonorable and completely negates any service you did.
(so that's where he stands in my book) (the armed forces won't go that far..
but they have disapproved of it).
Originally Posted by Fast car
His proceeds mainly went towards assisting veterans with PTSD as well as the families of the two downed SEAL's who's served with him. He didn't do this for glory and fame he did this to ensure his proceeds from the book were not going ton someone's pocket. Since Congress sucks at acting on anything the man took charge to help combat PTSD. You are entitled to your opinion though.