Show us your taint and/or pussy!

BD1969's Avatar
Perfect! Your name suits you. Originally Posted by NikkiWhite
And it is a pretty kitty saw it Thursday night.... Loves to be petted too.
Ty everyone!!
I think ill post more!!!
BD...are you referring to Ms Nikki? :/
NavyManSA2004's Avatar
Ty everyone!!
I think ill post more!!!
BD...are you referring to Ms Nikki? :/ Originally Posted by MsPrittiKitti
Meow...
Originally Posted by MsPrittiKitti
I'm putting this image on my screen background
brwillis's Avatar
Originally Posted by MsPrittiKitti
Where art and physiology coalesce. Simply beautiful.
Where art and physiology coalesce. Originally Posted by brwillis
Would that then be a phart?
foghorn's Avatar
Interesting post...

Of course... not half as ENTERTAINING as calling me GRANMA & OG(online gangster)... but Hey... I get it... Stalkers have to MIX UP THEIR BORING ASS TAUNTS...

Photoshop? Yeppers, I decided that the DECAPITATED LOOK was not as HOT & SEXY so, I had a friend show me how to blur my face on their phone... Is there a PROBLEM with that?


Fyi... I GET that you DO NOT LIKE ME... and frankly, I just don't GIVE A DAMN... Lol... I'm not exactly YOUR BIGGEST FAN...

However, the DIFFERENCE between YOU & I is that I do not have the time or the interest to STALK YOUR EVERY POST to BASH & BULLY YOU... You just aren't that interesting or important to me... To each their own right?

But I am FAIRLY CERTAIN that after nearly 100 NEGATIVE POSTS about me that I can make a VERY GOOD case for CYBER STALKING...

I tell you what... YOU leave ME ALONE and I will gladly reciprocate!! Deal?




NOW, BACK ON TOPIC!!






Attachment 395887







Have a great day!!

Your work out loving slave,

Guinevere
Originally Posted by Slave Guinevere
We have a winner
Grace Preston's Avatar
Seems some in the dfw area do not like the changes. Saying the arena is becoming less classy with the pussy/taint photos. Anyone agree or disagree?

I could go either way depending on certain images, seems the pics that have popped up here on this site have been fine in both the threads here and the few pics that a couple girls posted in dfw coed. They have chosen another route however with some pretty disturbing images in the thread I started.

Are the changes good for eccie, or should they revert back to the old way?

Do the ladies think the changes help them, or have are they getting less business due to certain images? Any thoughts would help...

And more pics of course. Carry on... Originally Posted by Dr. Dew

From the perspective of someone who has ran adult sites.... let me explain a couple of my issues with it.

Unless something has changed (I haven't logged out to test the theory), anyone perusing the web can waltz into coed and see what is posted. Even minors. While yes, I know that is also true of porn sites, most porn sites do have an intro page you have to get past to "certify" you are 18 or older. In addition, right now the board is operating in a very very grey area as far as 2257 goes.

Now personally, I've always been more of a partially clothed girl in my images... but that is by choice to leave more to the imagination. Others can do as they see fit when it comes to their personal business. The slope is a slippery one... and I question the viability of just how low the lowest common denominator will get. Ever been in chat when there is no mod and a few borderline streetwalker girls start throwing up pussy shots? There is a FAR cry between what Slave and others have posted here, and the Gynecology Today shots that some ladies think are "tasteful".
Restaurants use pictures of their plates to market their products! It's nice to be able to see what's on the menu before you actually order the item and chow down. Some of these restaurant pictures are well done, others not so well done and/or don't look appetizing!

It can be the same here! Tastefully done shots of a pussy can attract clients, whereas gross pics or ones that are not tasteful not so much. Personally, I have vivid memories of a few beautiful pussies I've eaten and would appreciate tastefully done pics!

I haven't picked up a Playboy magazine in decades but I do remember when they first started showing a little cookie. It was tasteful and in many cases artfully done. One famous female painter is quite well known for her pictures of "flowers." In fact, I've seen many very artful full body nudes that would make me mortgage my house to put myself next to the model and fuck the shit out of her!

In fact, I used to have a full body nude on the wall behind my bar at home. She was reclining on a Chase lounge, partially draped with her mound exposed! Regretfully, I succumbed to my wife's demand that I get rid of it! I replaced it with a Sail Fish - ugh!

IJS
Grace Preston's Avatar
Restaurants use pictures of their plates to market their products! It's nice to be able to see what's on the menu before you actually order the item and chow down. Some of these restaurant pictures are well done, others not so well done and/or don't look appetizing!

It can be the same here! Tastefully done shots of a pussy can attract clients, whereas gross pics or ones that are not tasteful not so much. Personally, I have vivid memories of a few beautiful pussies I've eaten and would appreciate tastefully done pics!

I haven't picked up a Playboy magazine in decades but I do remember when they first started showing a little cookie. It was tasteful and in many cases artfully done. One famous female painter is quite well known for her pictures of "flowers." In fact, I've seen many very artful full body nudes that would make me mortgage my house to put myself next to the model and fuck the shit out of her!

IJS Originally Posted by Louigi
I don't disagree with what you are saying. What I'm saying is that when you have a large, diverse crowd-- sometimes trying to "compete" takes over. He asked why some are concerned with it making the board "less classy". That's why.

I have had a few very tasteful nudes over the years with just a hint of lips... but that is pretty much as far as I'm willing to personally go.

The far bigger issue, in my opinion, is the fact that anyone can post a pussy pic now. You don't have to be a Verified Provider.. which makes it a lot harder to police whether or not the newbie poster who isn't yet verified is, in fact, of age. That is where the 2257 issue (along with a host of other issues) comes into play. If they really want to allow providers to post pussy-- they need to at least regulate it to those who are verified only-- since they now require age verification for those under 25... or those who appear under 25.
I have had a few very tasteful nudes over the years with just a hint of lips... but that is pretty much as far as I'm willing to personally go.
Originally Posted by GracePreston
Perfect!

As for your other argument. There are a plethora of ways a minor can post taint on the web. Sheisterjohn could shed more light, but as long as the website does it's due diligence in preventing minors from posting I think they're safe!??? Redbook was not pro active in their policing of postings - ECCIE is!
Did u seriously just compare the works of Georgia O Keefe to hooker posts? Lol Luigi u must have seen some real wrecked vaginas in your life to be so concerned about seeing one before you go.
You guys have gone way beyond the purpose of this thread. Perhaps start another about being a good idea or not?
Mokoa's Avatar
  • Mokoa
  • 03-12-2015, 01:01 AM
I agree.

Let's keep this discussion to the original topic of this thread.
There were some good taint pics but need more on here!