The ladies should be able to review the guys

Both sound reasonable, but both will be shouted down. Originally Posted by Old-T

That's a guarantee, considering the typical mentality here. Both scenarios would be a major threat, and of course we can't have THAT!!!!!

I replied to your poll thread thinking that you meant that us ladies would review as hobbyists. Or did you mean that the providers would review the customers? Or both? Originally Posted by DakineOne777

Hopefully both. I don't have a problem with either one. Unfortunately I doubt it will ever happen.

.....Anyway, I can see it from the other side. But these little dick guys don't want everyone to know how lame they are. That and the irony of it all. They love to make fun of or put down ladies with stretch marks and mommy tummies, but they themselves have 50" waistlines, hairy backs, and can't get it up half the time. I'm not perfect, either, but I think it's hypocritical the way some of these guys act around here. Originally Posted by Randall Creed

Wow! Mr. Creed you are awesome! I couldn't have said it better myself. I'm hot for you now! ♡ Originally Posted by GingerKatt

WHY do you always post stuff saying what the ladies want to hear?

WHAT WE LOOK LIKE AND HOW WE PERFORM ARE IRRELEVANT!!!
WE are the customers.
Couldn't care less what any of these chicks think about my dick size.

What you call "putting down", I call "valuable information". We need that info to help determine who we are going to be spending our hard earned money on.

There is NO hypocrisy about it! CUSTOMERS review the "business", not the other way around. They are not our wives that we are calling fat, while having extra weight ourselves.

WE are PAYING them. That is why they cannot "review" us. Do restaurants review their customers? Of course not. It would be bad for business. Same shit here. These chicks aren't looking for love here, they're looking for money. Why would they do something that could only hurt their business. Like a guy who is PAYING to fuck wants to have to worry about how he "performed". You can get that with a "civilian". I understand that ladies might not like to be critiqued about their performance too. Difference is, their performance is their JOB so they can and should be expected to be critiqued. Money was spent on the service after all.

They have the Coed section to dispute a bad review, and they ALWAYS do. So it's not like they can't get their version of events out there for all to see. They can and they do.

As long as we are 1. ) clean, 2.) respectful, 3.) aren't covered in sores or some shit, 4.) play by their rules, and 5.) have CASH, we have fulfilled our part of the transaction terms. This is business.

No matter how much ass we may kiss, it's about money. I kiss no ass on here, but on the phone and at the session, I am nice and respectful to them. We laugh and joke around and have fun . Amazingly enough. No matter how much of an asshole a person is on here, if they follow those simple guidelines I just posted, they generally still want to fuck the guy.

Imagine that.

Women judge hobbyists on a scale of which men are easy to manipulate and who is less gross. Men that are quick and only one pop get high ratings because less gross touching to them. Men that want to be reviewed just believe they are liked. The women here like us for our money not anything else. Dick size makes no matter.

Some of the replies are so predictable and so myopic.

It never changes.

... WE are PAYING them. That is why they cannot "review" us. Do restaurants review their customers? Of course not. It would be bad for business. ... Originally Posted by albundy

You seem to be saying that the woman cannot be allowed to review us because they don't want to review us. Because it would hurt their businesses.

Use a little logic. If a woman doesn't want to review her clients, then I imagine she won't review them. Do you suppose?

As it happens, I'd be quite surprised if more than a very few client reviews got written, for the business reasons you state. In that case, the "problem" kind of takes care of itself, no?

Yeeeeesh.

The women that partake of providers should be allowed to write a review but only in Another Realm. Provider writing reviews of clients will never work.

You seem to be saying that the woman cannot be allowed to review us because they don't want to review us. Because it would hurt their businesses.
^^^
EXACTLY!!!
Use a little logic. If a woman doesn't want to review her clients, then I imagine she won't review them. Do you suppose?
^^^
ALL I'm using is logic. You guys, not so much.
As it happens, I'd be quite surprised if more than a very few client reviews got written, for the business reasons you state. In that case, the "problem" kind of takes care of itself, no?
^^^
No. A guy is paying for the experience to be about him. Shouldn't have to worry about "performance". You can get that with a "civilian". You are the customer. She needs to meet the CUSTOMER'S needs, not the other way around. Simple business practice.
Yeeeeesh. Originally Posted by James1588

Did some of you guys forget that they are indeed in "business". They aren't your "girlfriend" or something. This isn't Match.com. BUSINESSES DO NOT REVIEW THE CUSTOMERS!!! It's really simple.

They are MORE than capable of disputing ANYTHING they want to in Coed where everyone can see it.

A hooker would have to be hell bent on destroying potential business to start posting reviews on the customers who pay her. Imagine having to worry what the hooker posts about you when YOU paid HER to make it about YOU!!!

SOOO much ass kissing and living in Fantasyland here.

I also posted this in a similar thread discussing Provider Reviews of Clients:

The person paying for the service should be able to review, comment and critique the service provider. In the hobby and Real World.

If ladies were paying guys to see them, then allow a review of the guy (service provider) with PA Credit. If ladies were paying for another lady to see them, then allow a review of the gal (service provider) with PA Credit.

If ladies want to write reviews on the clients in the Coed section, then that is just fine and within their right of free speach; however, they need to keep in mind that the normal RW and Hobby business model is not for businesses to critique or review the customers in public, just the opposite.

Most clients (and in all RW businesses) will happily accept comments and recommendations for improvement from service providers if the recommendation is properly presented in such a manner that will obviously demonstrate value and enhanced pleasure of the session for both the provider and client.

To date, I have had one provider post a humorous Coed Thread on our session. She asked me first if I would be OK with it and I just asked her to not use my handle.

All turned out well, except she got a lot of PMs requesting for my handle (which she forwarded to me) and my PMs filled up with ladies wanting to see me. This all despite the fact she made fun of my little winky in the review.

Hope that all came out OK: ^^

The women that partake of providers should be allowed to write a review but only in Another Realm. Originally Posted by tucson

It may be a good start, but ultimately there is no sane reason why a woman can't submit an accurate and qualified review of her PAID session with a provider in the regular review area.

WE are PAYING them. That is why they cannot "review" us. Do restaurants review their customers? Of course not. It would be bad for business. Originally Posted by albundy

Do restaurants advertise whether or not they are newbie friendly? Do restaurants require you to give them references from two or more other restaurants before they will serve you? Of course not. It would be bad for business. Escorts can and do both those things.

WHAT WE LOOK LIKE AND HOW WE PERFORM ARE IRRELEVANT!!!
WE are the customers. Originally Posted by albundy

As long as we are 1. ) clean, 2.) respectful, 3.) aren't covered in sores or some shit, 4.) play by their rules, and 5.) have CASH, we have fulfilled our part of the transaction terms. This is business. Originally Posted by albundy

To play Devil's advocate, if you've met number five, why do 1, 2, and 4 matter? If it is just a cash transaction, then as long as you have the cash, the rest is irrelevant.

Taking my tongue out of my cheek now, it really comes down to what we mean by review. I went back and re-read the OP, and she doesn't say. If we mean the providers should be able to review the hobbyists using the same template that the hobbyists use to review them, then I agree that it's a stupid idea, and most providers wouldn't want to do reviews. But what if the providers' template was based on Al's 5 points above?

The advantage that we hobbyists have in reviewing the providers is that when we are considering an escort, we can go to her profile and see all the reviews posted about that provider. A provider, however, when a hobbyist contacts her, has to go into the powder room and search for the hobbyist. If the hobbyist has changed his handle, or if any comments about the hobbyist were long ago, the search might not return all the relevant results. The provider also has to contact any references and wait for them to respond. If some type of feedback could be attached to the hobbyist's profile, the provider could quickly review the information and make a decision. This is easier for the provider, but it is also an advantage to the hobbyist, because things like references that don't respond, etc. won't hinder making a timely appointment.

Tandy,

How dare you try to introduce a modicum of rational thought into the discussion.

We don't hanker to that new-fangled stuff in these here parts!

Did some of you guys forget that they are indeed in "business". They aren't your "girlfriend" or something. This isn't Match.com. BUSINESSES DO NOT REVIEW THE CUSTOMERS!!! It's really simple.

They are MORE than capable of disputing ANYTHING they want to in Coed where everyone can see it.

A hooker would have to be hell bent on destroying potential business to start posting reviews on the customers who pay her. Imagine having to worry what the hooker posts about you when YOU paid HER to make it about YOU!!!

SOOO much ass kissing and living in Fantasyland here. Originally Posted by albundy

Reading. "Left to right, top to bottom." It's easy. You should try it sometime.

What a maroon!

Believe it or not there are women that pay providers for service. They are the ones I would like to write reviews. No provider in her right mind would write about a session with a client. She would be out of business as soon as she hit the submit button.

Do restaurants advertise whether or not they are newbie friendly? Do restaurants require you to give them references from two or more other restaurants before they will serve you? Of course not. It would be bad for business. Escorts can and do both those things.

^^^
(Restaurants won't get arrested for serving you, hookers can be. That's why. Doesn't change the FACT that it's a business transaction. Different businesses have different terms to be met by the customer. In any business transaction, terms have to be met. Same with hookers. Hookers can refuse to do business with you if you don't meet their terms. But, make no mistake, it is a business first and foremost.)

To play Devil's advocate, if you've met number five, why do 1, 2, and 4 matter? If it is just a cash transaction, then as long as you have the cash, the rest is irrelevant.
...... Originally Posted by tandyscone

For all of you guys that think "it's more than just business". Try this. I REALLY mean it, try this:

Quit paying your favorite "provider" COMPLETELY. No cash at all. Now, ask her to come and hang out this weekend. Maybe invite her to a cook-out or to the movies with your buddies. Let's see how long she stays your "buddy." Now, get back to me and let me know how that worked out for you once there is no money to be made off of you.

Maybe you can invite her to break bread with your family at Thanksgiving or invite her to your kid's little league game.


Pfttt. And you tards call me a maroon. At least I don't kid myself.


And to Old-T and James, please point out EXACTLY what I wrote in my earlier posts that isn't true. Enlighten me.