I'll try not to belabor this too long.
The ONLY reason you gave was that some black guy traumatized her and as a result she went racist. And to you that makes sense as the only "guess" and that "maybe" being the reason. So for any black person that is abused or traumatized by a white person we should then be racist against whites? Is that your logical conclusion. Is that really all it takes for a person to become racist is for one person or another race to cause us pain and we should then dislike not just that person but all persons of that race or gender. That's highly illogical.
Originally Posted by 1blackman1
No, it's not "highly illogical." I know it from first hand experience when a relative was attacked and almost raped by a black man. Guess what word she started using AFTER that event? If you guessed "the N word" you'd be correct. I had never heard her say that word before, but you can bet she used it a lot in the months following her attack. She's not the only person that I know who has reacted to a crime or another adverse experience in the same manner. While some people may be raised a racists, others become racist based on their personal experiences.
What is illogical, is that someone who never seemed to have an issue before suddenly decides to hang out with a group of racist friends and after a few months becomes racist herself. It's far more likely that a sex worker would experience an assault or a rape than to simply change her circle of friends with attitudes that differ from what hers seemed to be in the very recent past.
Seems to make far less sense that if one bad experience caused by one person of some race subsequently causes one to dislike or hate ALL persons of that race then maybe there was either 1) a predisposition toward that attitude anyway or 2) some other event or set of event caused the change in perspective. In order to determine that all black men are "dangerous harmful disgusting" one must believe there is an inherent difference between black and white men, or the presumption would be all men are "dangerous harmful disgusting". Why stop lumping together based on the subcategory of race when gender is likely more appropriate.
Originally Posted by 1blackman1
If "gender is likely more appropriate," wouldn't she hate all men and not one particular race? If gender was the driving force would she have even come back to this profession? Of course not!
Since everyone seems to dismiss that she had a pre-disposition it seems more likely that this change was triggered by something else. Maybe, while she was off the scene(thanks for the correction) she was convinced by whites to dislike black men irrespective of her past experience with them (which did not seem to be an issue). You, however, appear to prefer to dismiss that possibility, even though there are people in this very thread that espouse a similar attitude. Hell, one proudly only sees NBA providers (I presume because he doesn't want to admit to himself that he is actually licking plenty "black nut" cream pie when he goes down on the chicks) and a series of people that pretend that racism and prejudice are either nonexistent or only perpetuated by the minority (as if any of us have anything to gain by doing so).
Originally Posted by 1blackman1
I don't "dismiss" your theory, but it is the less logical explanation as I mentioned above.
Obviously, we won't agree on this but IF this is really April Cox then I think it would take more than "new friends" to change her attitude and demeanor in this situation.