Terminological inexactitudes and Wakeup

How about #Mexa-zoid?

Bump...

.......If they each modified their behaviour a little they would be very welcome here........ Originally Posted by essence

liar liar pants on fire

What you is, King Turd of Shit Mountain? Who gave you plenary authority over this here whore board? Originally Posted by Don T. Lukbak

First ad hominem, so you admit I am right.

liar liar pants on fire Originally Posted by dearhunter

Maybe they wouldn't be welcome, but I wouldn't classify that as a lie compared to your and Wakeup's lies which directly manipulate and distort statements, more of a disappointment.

#TerminologyMatters

Your argument is based upon a false premise. Namely that she did not in fact admit to it and that he is, therefore, a liar in suggesting that she did.

She said she was hispanic/white. She also said she was caucasian.

I'm hispanic/white. It says Caucasian because I am. Originally Posted by Alana kay

You have focused almost solely on her assertion that she is Caucasian and then follow it up with numerous rather condescending (to those of us with educations) explanations of what it means to be caucasoid. The definitions of caucasoid/mongoloid/negroid are so broad as to be essentially useless in today's world which is why even anthropologists and sociologists no longer use those distinctions.

What you fail to hit upon in any meaningful way is the difference between race and ethnicity. That's very convenient for you because it reinforces your argument but the field in question on the showcase refers to ethnicity.

She admitted she was hispanic which is an ethnicity...and caucasian which is a race. She's correct of course. But so is he in suggesting that she admitted to being of partially hispanic ethnicity.

Ergo, what WU said was actually factually correct. She admitted she was not entirely white but instead has hispanic ethnicity. What else would she possibly mean when saying she was hispanic/white? Technically that makes her of mixed ethnicity which was WU's assertion all along.

According to Pew Research something like 48% of multiracial hispanics self identify as racially white but that does not mean they are not ethnically hispanic. Indeed the 2010 US census did not identify hispanic as a race but instead asked as a separate question "are you of hispanic or non-hispanic origin". It is the only ethnicity question on the census currently. Many hispanics did not even fill out the racial question because they did not know what to put.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Ok....let me chill a bit....

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha ha

#1 most useless thread- This one. This is a site about Escorts and Clients, not this crapola. I regret taking the time to read through all 7 pages.

#2 most useless thread- How much all the Hooktards and Fucktards miss Dorfy. I don't.

#3 most useless thread- Any other thread about Wakeup. He is what he is. Get over it!

As Clint Eastwood says: " I miss the good old days when everyone wasn't an overly sensitive CRYBABY."

Your argument is based upon a false premise. Namely that she did not in fact admit to it and that he is, therefore, a liar in suggesting that she did.

She said she was hispanic/white. She also said she was caucasian.



You have focused almost solely on her assertion that she is Caucasian and then follow it up with numerous rather condescending (to those of us with educations) explanations of what it means to be caucasoid. The definitions of caucasoid/mongoloid/negroid are so broad as to be essentially useless in today's world which is why even anthropologists and sociologists no longer use those distinctions.

What you fail to hit upon in any meaningful way is the difference between race and ethnicity. That's very convenient for you because it reinforces your argument but the field in question on the showcase refers to ethnicity.

She admitted she was hispanic which is an ethnicity...and caucasian which is a race. She's correct of course. But so is he in suggesting that she admitted to being of partially hispanic ethnicity.

Ergo, what WU said was actually factually correct. She admitted she was not entirely white but instead has hispanic ethnicity. What else would she possibly mean when saying she was hispanic/white? Technically that makes her of mixed ethnicity which was WU's assertion all along.

According to Pew Research something like 48% of multiracial hispanics self identify as racially white but that does not mean they are not ethnically hispanic. Indeed the 2010 US census did not identify hispanic as a race but instead asked as a separate question "are you of hispanic or non-hispanic origin". It is the only ethnicity question on the census currently. Many hispanics did not even fill out the racial question because they did not know what to put.

Originally Posted by SpiceItUp

What he said!

I'm sticking with liar liar pants on fire.......it is most appropriate for this retarded threAD

Damn it Spice...

Epic pratfail

Spice is, of course, completely wrong. He ignores the simple fact that she said she is caucasian, and WU lied when he said she admitted she was not caucasian.

The fact that white-hispanic IS Caucasian is a secondary issue.

Take off the blindfolds.

Your argument is based upon a false premise. Namely that she did not in fact admit to it and that he is, therefore, a liar in suggesting that she did.

She said she was hispanic/white. She also said she was caucasian.
Originally Posted by SpiceItUp

Exactly, So Wakeup lied when he said she admitted she was not Caucasian. Simples. Education seems to be lacking, as well as simple comprehension.

I don't understand your first sentence. What did she not admit to, and what did WU suggest she did?

He never 'suggested' anything. He said categorically that she admitted she was not Caucasian. A lie. She may or may not be Caucasian, but she never ever admitted she was not.

Geeeezzzzz.