Please Join Me in Welcoming the Newest Member of the #Pussy Posse

It's likely part of the ruse:

"Hey there, Missy New Girl. Wouldn't you like to know a huckleberry esquire, in the event you should ever have any problems with the law? After all, this prostitution business you've undertaken is a risky enterprise."

"Of course now, the donation you're asking for is a bit higher than the ladies I regularly help with their legal matters charge me. What can we do about lowering that?"

"By the way, did I mention I'm also The Marshal of ECCIE? I can help you on there too! I promote my favorite ladies all the time. Get them a real boost to their business too."

"Now then, about your donation. I'll pay you what I feel is fair and you'll be happy about it. It's called quid pro quo, little lady. (Latin for I fuck you good). How's that sound to you?" Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

OMG is this for real??? This is seriously how he is coming at ladies???? NO WAY should this be allowed!!! I am lost for words....please tell me this is a joke and he didn't really send that to someone? If so.....well Im all about seeking some or invoking some civil action on this matter as in " Put your teeth on the curb bitch"!!!!!
Dumb Founded!!!!!

It was a joke, although not far from the truth I imagine.

He gives the I want to see you exclusively, no need for condoms, take you to nice dinners on the river walk, etc, bs.... and pay 200$.....

Tried it with me and many others. I'm sure he gave you a similar speech.

Besos,
Francisca

It was a joke, although not far from the truth I imagine. Originally Posted by Ms Francisca

We could label it a "dramatization, based on real events." Like on TV.

What say you, ck?

You "vouch" a fox into the hen house and say:

*not a fox?
*not a hen house?
*not actually a vouch?
*not your problem? Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

Another day & no response from ck1942. Hmmm.

Maybe he hasn't seen this post?
Maybe he's above having to answer this post?

Maybe Santa will bring ck his own Coed thread on provider safety for Christmas? (If only SL were still around to do a video or two!)

I was told two stories story about ck from a hooker who went to a social and was new at the time I'm not sure if and how much is true. Im suspicious of why she told me she stated he attacked me on here and thought I had the balls to speak up at the time I thought she could be lying so Before leaving town again I asked someone else they knew his social had been busted once but couldn't remember details that gave her some more credibility in my opinion.

1st. Years ago one of his socials got raided by the police some shady characters were arrested and it made the news.

2. Ck got with this intoxocated new girl after the event and while under the influence she was persuaded to have a session at a very low rate and ever since she woke up the next morning she felt he had siezed an opportunity to take advantage of her.

She said she learned about the first event from another hooker after she confided in her about the 2nd she keeps quiet because she feels it's been to long and at the time he would of retaliated and hurt her business. Both of these happened way back according to her I can't know if it's all true but I suspect it's at least partially true. If so by inviting the likes of doc history always begs to repeat itself. Does anybody run these johns real names through the online sex offender data base? The potential for sex offenders to be involved in prostitution is very high I don't want to be standing in a room with them when police show up for violating court agreements or to get some other criminal I don't need my picture in local news about this. So maybe he has something in common with doc ( they say birds of a feather flock together). As for ck not replying right now maybe Christmas has him busy?

^ probably true..you ain't the first that has heard that about ck1942 ....he uses his little gatherings for his malicious intents....

DocHolyday why you keep asking providers to bareback? I know you have asked several for this and they stop replying to you'r pm's. You dumb fuck.

why you think ck1942 still invites that degenerate DocHolyday to his picnics ....

both have similar tactics on this board on trying to persuasive providers...if you providers can't see that well not much can be done...

and MrBangBang21 you still recording sessions secretly and posting them on porn sites without the hookers consent?...i know several providers from p411 that you did this to so shut up man boobies.....

None of the above posts have little relevance to accurate facts.

But it is always very easy for relative unknowns and for open trolls to claim "facts."

CS claims to be a high value player who doesn't play with local escorts, yet "hookers confide in him." No reviews ever posted that might serve as any form of validation

Yanks has never been vouched into a social to the best of my recollection, but he questions social vouching.

GDS is one of those "soul of conscience" trolls who has zero credibility of contributing to the data base, but delights in spreading gossip from his "private sources."

Vouching for gents:

== requires vouches from at least two established providers to join the full active invite list; they attest to his good behavior bcd and their belief he will respect the event rules. Board behavior is also considered. Off the board behavior has been added to the. factors.

== Further and continued social access is based on event and board behavior, periodic established provider re-vouching and attendance minimums.

The socially committees do not engage in public debates on guests.

In fact, a thinking observer could easily extrapolate from public discourse that such speakers may have ulterior motives and issues in such discourse.

Especially when such speakers make it obvious in posts elsewhere that they are more interested in spouting and sparking community discord.

ck1942 has always been privately available by pm/em for guests or bystanders who feel their input is relevant to the safety and security of event attendees and indeed the community itself. Plus other hobby issues and questions.

I will take this opportunity to remind all in this discussion that it's topic is not CK and his socials and it is not Mrbangbang and his videos. Those topics and others may be discussed in their own threads. Not here.

Stick to the topic.

Yes.
I'm surprised the Doc Huckster hasn't come in and chided all these coat tail hangers/riders that they are taking away the limelight from his Huckleberryness.

This guy posing as “Doc Holiday” wouldn’t make a pimple on the real Holidays ass...

Sheep herder, in case you forgot your own thread. You may continue here. Think we all know it's bullshit.

https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php...ht=social+raid

As for Doc attending socials. Could care less. Your co worker may be a sex offender. Your bank teller. Who knows. Its no different than here. Hell, Sheep, if you pay for it you may as well be one too, we all may be. The girl you had the other night would be one. Not that you would go to socials anyhow. You can't even get vouched for. Doesn't change anything. The posse thing is a terrible idea. Let's hope he doesn't continue this charade at upcoming events so we don't get more threads like this one.

I will take this opportunity to remind all in this discussion that it's topic is not CK and his socials and it is not Mrbangbang and his videos. Those topics and others may be discussed in their own threads. Not here.

Stick to the topic. Originally Posted by Mokoa

Mokoa, I beg to differ. The OP mentioned ck's socials in his original post. The OP claimed he, and his merry bunch, were attendees of ck's socials. By extension, why ck admits the OP into his "vouched" social is in question, and on topic.

My question to ck, which has gone unanswered to this point, is what exactly is he "vouching," when several ladies have "counter-vouched" the OP. They claim he's a crook and an intimidator, among other things.

And, yes, ck, I attended several socials as a "vouched" member, back when I thought it was a good idea to do so. I stopped attending 4+ years ago. Frankly, the turnouts typically were small (contrary to the inflated numbers you post in Coed -- lol), the crowd mostly male and the venue always the same. I doubt much has changed.

So your clumsy attempt to discredit this questioner (based on some silly notion that only one who goes to the socials can question the safety protocols of the socials) is, nonetheless, a decided FAIL. But ad hominen arguments aren't real arguments, are they?

But Mokoa is also right: this matter probably does deserve its own thread. It's been my experience that those who won't answer simple questions about their particular practices, who like to keep said practices tucked away from scrutiny, have much to hide.

Yes, having checked backwards in my time records, Yanks is correct in that he was invited to and attended events for a several year stretch. He was, obviously, vouched in by multiple providers over that time frame. My apologies for first having checked historic files before making my statement.

No, Yanks is not correct in saying I have not responded to his vouching point.

All I have told any attendee is that vouching of any member assures that he or she is a legit hobbyist or a legit provider; ck1942 does not vouch for anything "BCD" and I instruct the ladies that they should always exercise their own vouching/verification process before engaging in any BCD. It is up to them to follow through.

As for everything else, I don't take advantage of any guests sober or not.

As for the vouching protocol being in question, well, seems to me that every person attending any event thus accepts the vouching protocol and those not on the invite/guest list have obviously made their own personal decision for whatever reasons. Which I applaud.

Socials are not for everyone and and have never been intended as such.

For those hereabouts who feel the past 15 years worth of events in San Antonio are not for them, thanks for not overcrowding my in box.

Happy Hobbying!

That was alot of reading. I think everyone needs to spend more time with the ladies and less with their keyboards.