Fumbling Bumbling Idiots

No he didn't. He redacted the name of a CIA agent before releasing hildebeest's emails. Cummings tried to distort what happened. Stop lying and deflecting, trashboy. Only pathologically insecure people post in boldface all the time. Originally Posted by lustylad

"He redacted" So he altered evidence and made it look like it was classified. Same difference fool.

"pathologically insecure people post in boldface" So when your lover IB makes the quote small and washed out looking and increases the font size does that make him a better person?
By the way from this link https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog...bably-insecure you tried to use the 1st one on me so now who is the pathologically insecure one? Also while they all seem to be in your wheelhouse #4 is common in all conservatives

"He redacted" So he altered evidence and made it look like it was classified. Same difference fool.

"pathologically insecure people post in boldface" So when your lover IB makes the quote small and washed out looking and increases the font size does that make him a better person?
By the way from this link https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog...bably-insecure you tried to use the 1st one on me so now who is the pathologically insecure one? Also while they all seem to be in your wheelhouse #4 is common in all conservatives Originally Posted by MT Pockets

You've been the jackass that is posting in bold, M T Brain Socket. You just skewered your own lib-retard-ass, M T Brain Socket.

Is WTF really that dense or does he just play the part?

It seems he is fine with leaving corrupt people in place because he believes they will only be replaced with a more corrupt people. It is called reality....you should try it. This is no different than say Jerusalem.....the party in power, rules the city. If the Muslims had more firepower, the Jews would be the bad guys. Corruption is in the eye of the beholder. I know that is two complicated for ya there 2dogs but thems the facts.
Well I agree that that is always a potential problem regardless of the party in charge, but I would rather take my chnaces with an unknown than to allow a corrupt one to stay. Of course you want to replace the people who do not see the world like you with folks that do....big surprise there. You are just making my point. Look , to the Victor go the Spoils but do not make it out to be some high moral ground

By the way, there are a whole lot of other news organizations than Fox that are reporting what is being found out. Originally Posted by The2Dogs

Really...and which one's are distorting the truth like Fox?

It’s hard to tell if Snitchy is playing stupid on purpose, or he was born that way. I’m thinking he’s playing the hand he was dealt. Originally Posted by bambino

MTBrain I mean pockets.

Are you really that dumb?
No, seriously, are you really that dumb?

Hillary has never been found "not guilty" n a court of law for the crimes she committed as Secretary of State or as a candidate for POTUS. There has never been a real investigation by the FBI into her crimes. The DOJ was in on the sham.

Bambino, I thinck you are correct. The hand he was dealt.

Corruption is in the eye of the beholder. Originally Posted by WTF

Wrong, asshole. Soft-pedaling an investigation and predetermining its outcome for political reasons is corruption, no matter which party benefits from it.

Colluding with one political party to obtain a warrant to spy on the opposing party during the heat of a campaign is corruption, no matter which side benefits from it.

Bam is right... you were born stupid!

[QUOTE=lustylad;1060420386]Wrong, asshole. Soft-pedaling an investigation and predetermining its outcome for political reasons is corruption, no matter which party benefits from it.

Colluding with one political party to obtain a warrant to spy on the opposing party during the heat of a campaign is corruption, no matter which side benefits from it.

Bam is right... you were born stupid![/QUOTE

It’s pretty obvious.

Yo man, I didn steel nuffin, I borrowed dat car.

That is WTF's logic.

"He redacted" So he altered evidence and made it look like it was classified. Same difference fool.

"pathologically insecure people post in boldface" So when your lover IB makes the quote small and washed out looking and increases the font size does that make him a better person?
By the way from this link https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog...bably-insecure you tried to use the 1st one on me so now who is the pathologically insecure one? Also while they all seem to be in your wheelhouse #4 is common in all conservatives Originally Posted by MT Pockets

He was under a legal obligation to redact the CIA operative's name, ya friggen MORON ! YOUR selective, LYING LIBERAL, WK FOR LUBE memory about officials in the Bush 2 administration being investigated and PROSECUTED for giving up Valerie Plame as a CIA agent must have NEVER stuck in that cum dumpster of YOURS !

Bambino, I thinck you are correct. The hand he was dealt. Originally Posted by The2Dogs

whitewater Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

White water was way before this issue..

Because she was innocent LOL!
You guys did all you could to convict her . Gowdy even fabricated evidence. How many times did they investigate Benghazi? Originally Posted by MT Pockets

What evidence did gowdy fabricate against her?
AND IF HE DID fabricate any, why isn't HE UNDER ARREST for creating that fabricated evidence?

CAUSE HE DIDN'T!

You can't fix stupid.

You can't fix stupid. Originally Posted by The2Dogs

As you prove with each and every one of your posts.

White water was way before this issue..
Originally Posted by garhkal

yes, but due to the way the comment was worded, whitewater was the only case that the clintons were taken to court and yes its before the current issue..