She is RIGHT...you betcha!

Honestly, I'm not trying to provide Palin an "out."

The economy is tanking, unemployment is still 9% and we are on 3 military fronts. Did anyone solve the budget limit problem? What does Palin have to say on that? If so, why isn't it being reported? If we are going to split hairs on her Revere statement, why don't we do it to all politicians? 57 states? How tired does on have to be? If Obama has a plan, to solve these problems, again, why isn't it being reported? Even MSNBC, isn't reporting Obama's "plans", they're just bashing Palin.

Also, if reporters are going to file "Freedom of Information Act" requests to doggedly pursue her emails, why aren't they pursuing the bin Laden photos will the same vigor? My guess is 90% more Americans would rather see the photos than Palin's emails.

he"ll also jump in with the "mob" to shun you for using "offensive" language ( for wat ever they deem it to be on any given day..LOL..) Originally Posted by JONBALLS

What the hell are you talking about? Me? Jump in with the "mob"? Me?

her 25,000 emails have , so far , turned out to be a goose chase, count on the paranoia of her running escalating to a fever pitch .

Please tell me you would vote for her. Please oh please oh please oh please.

However, after reading your post, and I don't recall this being mentioned here before, I realized that she was entirely correct. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

No, she wasn't. But even if that were the case, answering the question "What is 2+2" by saying "Um, it's a number.....greater than 2" is also entirely correct. But it's still an answer given by a moron.

The economy is tanking, unemployment is still 9% and we are on 3 military fronts. Did anyone solve the budget limit problem? What does Palin have to say on that? If so, why isn't it being reported? Originally Posted by gnadfly

I can tell you what she has to say on that. "Freedom loving Americans". And "Socialism". And "Guns". And "Free market principles". And, of course, "Obamacare" and "Tax cuts". In other words, the same thing she (and every other Republican) has to say on every policy issue.

If we are going to split hairs on her Revere statement, why don't we do it to all politicians?

The people splitting hairs are the ones trying to say she was correct.

57 states?

Ringing bells?

If Obama has a plan, to solve these problems, again, why isn't it being reported?

It is. On FOX. And the plan is to delve us deeper and deeper into socialistic policies while denying where he was really born. Haven't you heard?

[quote=Doove;1382260]What the hell are you talking about? Me? Jump in with the "mob"? Me? Ohh, all right, maybe as not part of the "mob"..

Please tell me you would vote for her. Please oh please oh please oh please. LOL...now I gotta say yes, I gotta see what your gonna say next..

now I gotta say yes, I gotta see what your gonna say next.. Originally Posted by JONBALLS

What's to say? That speaks volumes on its own.

IBH, I'm sure WTF will find a song lyric or movie allusion to make his point!


My point is the automatic derision. Did she disavow Revere warning the Colonist (who were mainly British in that area)? Why not let it go? . Originally Posted by gnadfly

Or why not admit she was mistaken?

All the Colonist were British subjects at the time.

But if you listen to her answer to the orginial question, it does not line up to the facts. PR was not riding around warning the British that the "We are going to kick ya'lls ass.''

That is basically wtf she said and no one should cover up the fact that she was mistaken and now a liar, just like Anthony Weiner. The cover-up is wtf makes you look stupid.

There gnad, no songs and I worked her deception into just the same thing Anthony Weiner did.

You folks that love the old girl may not like the fact that she is trying to cover up a blunder....I sure the fuc can understand , I hated that Weiner tried it, difference is I am not blindly following one lie after another to cover for them.

What's to say? That speaks volumes on its own. Originally Posted by Doove

half the country voted bummer in on a "slogan", If the country has that many "morons" walking around, Im more than happy to observe Carter #2, then 3 on steroids .Ive always been a masochist, bring on the pain, those voters really really really really need to get what they asked for. That is how its all set up anyways, people vote,and someone wins.To me , thats gonna be more fun.Watching everyone clamoring for their handout and wondering where it is!!LOL!!Its kinda already started, but it hasnt anywhere near gone far enough to have any lasting affects, if we interrupt this mid stream, the weak will soon forget what happened and well have to go through this all over again. Lets just get it over with in one fell swoop, another four years is the medicine we need.Stop drip and drabbing it, rip it off like a bandaid!Plus, why should all the young people, running around loving their savior not have to live with the consequences of their young life decisions?, give it to them..

The woman had just visited the Revere museum, and no doubt heard from the tour guide what Revere himself had later written about his encounter with the British. Yet, this is reason to call her all sort of names etc.

Meanwhile, Obama talks about an uncle who liberated a concentration camp that was actually liberated by the Red Army. I don't recall the hue and cry from the left side of the house over that one.

Let's re-cap, a little known, but apparently accurate statement about an historical figure who died some two centuries ago vs an unverifiable (impossible actually) story about a blood relative who may, I suppose have been alive during Obama's lifetime.

Yeah, burn the witch!

LMAOF.

The woman had just visited the Revere museum, and no doubt heard from the tour guide what Revere himself had later written about his encounter with the British. Yet, this is reason to call her all sort of names etc.

Meanwhile, Obama talks about an uncle who liberated a concentration camp that was actually liberated by the Red Army. I don't recall the hue and cry from the left side of the house over that one.

Let's re-cap, a little known, but apparently accurate statement about an historical figure who died some two centuries ago vs an unverifiable (impossible actually) story about a blood relative who may, I suppose have been alive during Obama's lifetime.

Yeah, burn the witch!

LMAOF. Originally Posted by Iaintliein

She got it wrong....she got just enough right to not be technically wrong as they all were British subjects at the time but she got it wrong. He did not ride off to warn the British that we were going to kick the living shit out of them. She just made that shit up and then has tried to spin that lie into the truth. Same as Bill when he said it depends on the the meaning of 'is' is.

I understand lying to save your nuts from your wife but Palin could just as easily said, "My bad." and the case would be closed.

But if your point is the press reports about shit that is way less important than other things going on I would agree with you. This Weiner case is a perfect example. All over the news and it seems to be much ado about nothing.

The bigger news is Gates retirement and the ensuing shuffle and how that plays out on the War front. It appears the military is getting their way with a longer commitment but no debate over that, instead we get Palin and Weiner.....

" appears the military is getting their way with a longer commitment".

I'm not so sure that is the actual case on the ground, but I can not elaborate.

" appears the military is getting their way with a longer commitment".

I'm not so sure that is the actual case on the ground, but I can not elaborate. Originally Posted by Iaintliein

Good, I hope they pull out of that hell hole and fast.


The Pentagon Papers were released Monday and what they had to say about winning over villages is as true today as it was back then.

Good, I hope they pull out of that hell hole and fast.


The Pentagon Papers were released Monday and what they had to say about winning over villages is as true today as it was back then. Originally Posted by WTF

Good for everyone except the rear guard and their parents. The way to withdraw safely is push them back harder to form a bigger bubble to fall back into. Not what appears to be happening.

She's out of it anyway. She's an opportunist who jumps from place to place, donor to donor as fast as the eye can see.
Michelle Bachman is the true believer and could actually get the R nomination if the cards fall right. And if she does, she'll beat Obama like batter for a cake.

She's out of it anyway. She's an opportunist who jumps from place to place, donor to donor as fast as the eye can see.
Michelle Bachman is the true believer and could actually get the R nomination if the cards fall right. And if she does, she'll beat Obama like batter for a cake. Originally Posted by John Bull

While I agree with you on Palin, the price of oil will determine our next President, just like it has for the last thirty years.

Michelle Bachman is the true believer and could actually get the R nomination if the cards fall right. And if she does, she'll beat Obama like batter for a cake. Originally Posted by John Bull

Michele Bachmann is little more than another Sarah Palin, only with somewhat better handlers.

Her getting the R nomination, or even getting elected President could have beneficial long-term affects, however, in that it could finally, finally put an end to the Republican's infatuation with stupidity.

What's to say? That speaks volumes on its own. Originally Posted by Doove

that was pretty anticlimatic...Bachmann is my choice, thats after 6 more to FINALLY, FINALLY. put to end the libs infatuation with...umm.. the road being paved with good intentions and leading us to HELL!!!!LOL!!