The Tramp Stamp Violence Thread

First off I wanted to give Jules a big hug and kiss. Jules you are a wonderful lady and your choice of self expression is beautiful. I personally do not have any tattoos , I choose to get pierced. I think ink is very sexy and its not for everyone. Jules does not hide who she is. In this business it is how honest you are with your appearance that matters.

Rabbit, when you posted her picture with out her permission and using her as an example it became offensive. A general thread would have been more politically correct.

It is acceptable to not find something or someone sexually attractive. If we all liked the same thing then the world would not need so many different flavors of ice cream

What's with the rampant name calling in this thread??

Butt-Nugget? Seriously? It doesnt help your cause. Not defending. Just staing a fact, based on the rules of the board.

Can't you ladies and gentlemen express your viewpoint without resorting to lowest common denominator insults?

Is this more the norm in Dallas? Just asking. It's a no-go here in Austin. Originally Posted by Damon Bradley

You know, you and rrabbit are the main ones who stir up stuff. Why can't you be civil and stop acting like a child. GROW UP, PAL!

Jules, sexy tat. Just tasty. Mucho tasty on a good looking body like yours.

Your first message, very clearly, is a reference to ONE person's photograph. Respectfully, you are a liar as well as a douchebag.



None. There have been none so far. Originally Posted by edm_fw

By implication, had I posted a second pic, I would be more in the clear. And another 1,000,000 more pics, by association, would have made it negligible. Is that the presmise of your math ?

If that's not what you are saying, please elaborate to those of us standing in the dark of the White Knight.

Since you have already defined me to be a "douchebag", by association of the above implication that you just chose to uphold, what name would you like for me to throw at you ?

Confucius say... HOW STUPID IS STUPID, WHEN STUPID DON'T KNOW STUPID IS STUPID ?

You know, you and rrabbit are the main ones who stir up stuff. Why can't you be civil and stop acting like a child. GROW UP, PAL!

Jules, sexy tat. Just tasty. Mucho tasty on a good looking body like yours. Originally Posted by The_Leopard

I have already conceded that I selected a provocative title to incite reaction. So your comment about stirring up stuff is valid.

However, please do explain the grow up part ? Interested in a grown up reply.

You know, you and rrabbit are the main ones who stir up stuff. Why can't you be civil and stop acting like a child. GROW UP, PAL!
Originally Posted by The_Leopard

Uhmm, no sir, that's not true. You will never see me stirring up anything here. FYI, I dissapeared for most of this year due to the negativity on these here boards. Did you even notice?

I do not name call. I do call out, but I do it without insulting. I spend most of my time these days posting information, the primary purpose or this site. Comparing me to rrrabbit? Take a second look at posting styles. Apples and Oranges, Leapord.

That was uncalled for sir. Especially since I love tats.



I certainly hope points are being doled out, because this is a fine how do ya do of a thread...

SERIOUSLY ?

Let's examine that last comment a bit. You are expressing to me what I should and should not think. Or was that an expression of your opinion ? If it was your opinion, why don't I see the corresponding qualifier ? Originally Posted by rrrabbit

Wow. I never ever expressed what you should or should not think. You're entitled to your own opinion; we all are. But when you go OUT of your way to point out one individual provider and her appearance and start a thread about how you personally do not like how she looks - that is a personal attack, not to mention rude.

Now had you started a thread without a specific provider's picture/ad and just stated that you do not prefer girls with multiple tattoos, or tattoos that cover parts of the body, then by all means, go right ahead -- it would be a good topic up for debate because, like I said before, WE ALL LIKE DIFFERENT THINGS.

As shown in the responses, many men find her extremely attractive with the tats! I don't see any of them posting threads bashing the types of girls you like -- oh wait, that might be because the majority of them are gentlemen!

If you still do not see how your OP was offensive then you are a lost cause. Think what you want, but you don't have to voice your every personal sexual and physical preference in a co-ed thread. Go browse the ads and find a lady that suits you, and go get laid. Life is too short to waste your time posting your dislikes and then defending yourself excessively like this.

Uhmm, no sir, that's not true. You will never see me stirring up anything here. FYI, I dissapeared for most of this year due to the negativity on these here boards. Did you even notice?

I do not name call. I do call out, but I do it without insulting. I spend most of my time these days posting information, the primary purpose or this site. Comparing me to rrrabbit? Take a second look at posting styles. Apples and Oranges, Leapord.

That was uncalled for sir. Especially since I love tats.



I certainly hope points are being doled out, because this is a fine how do ya do of a thread... Originally Posted by Damon Bradley

An opinion is an opinion. I never understood why it has to be labeled negative or positive. So long as peoples' opinions are being expressed as opinions, I figure more to chew and more to consider into the equation. Holds true for providers and clients alike. No ???

If that's not the functional beauty of this board, we'd all be on P411 or something similar with little to no interaction among the masses - no ?

However, I agree that some choose to take a vacation because of the perceived heat/flame or whatever you want to call it factor. That's a personal choice though, and while the masses contribute to that choice, the masses ought not be held accountable.

Furthermore, I agree that Bradley does not stand in the same category as myself in terms of stirring the pot factor.

More perspective thought and subsequent replies, is my 2 cents.

Tats anyone ???????

Wow. I never ever expressed what you should or should not think. You're entitled to your own opinion; we all are. But when you go OUT of your way to point out one individual provider and her appearance and start a thread about how you personally do not like how she looks - that is a personal attack, not to mention rude.

Now had you started a thread without a specific provider's picture/ad and just stated that you do not prefer girls with multiple tattoos, or tattoos that cover parts of the body, then by all means, go right ahead -- it would be a good topic up for debate because, like I said before, WE ALL LIKE DIFFERENT THINGS.

As shown in the responses, many men find her extremely attractive with the tats! I don't see any of them posting threads bashing the types of girls you like -- oh wait, that might be because the majority of them are gentlemen!

If you still do not see how your OP was offensive then you are a lost cause. Think what you want, but you don't have to voice your every personal sexual and physical preference in a co-ed thread. Go browse the ads and find a lady that suits you, and go get laid. Life is too short to waste your time posting your dislikes and then defending yourself excessively like this. Originally Posted by Jamieyoung

Adult response in my book. Thank you for making time for a reasonable reply. It beats 90% of others.

However, please read EXACT quote below made by yourself. It directly references how one ought to or not ought to think (in BOLD). Furthermore, references to mincing words made by yourself seem to have recursively taken hold in your quote posted above. Please check your top/down design flow chart - clearly there is a bug there.

I have explained how and why my OP was not a direct attack enough times that you, as a responsible citizen of this board, have the duty to read before you shoot off on your keyboard.

Furthermore, my first reply to this OP contained an apology to all whose feelings I hurt, and I clarified that my OP was not directed at any one person (since it was clear that my message was perhaps being taken personally).

You seem to be playing a high and low poker game, based on whatever angle is convenient at the moment. Problem is, dealer did not call a high/low split game.

Clearly, my in OP I was representing a high hand, and I have stuck with it.

However, what I've seen thus far is mostly "cha ching, thanks rabbit" repeated time and time again, followed by hit-n-go recruits who can't formulate a sentence - much less a point of view, along with the occasional genuine hit-and-run opinion.

Please make up your mind, and then tell us how you really feel.

That's the most adult response I have to offer.

Rabbit, you're IGNORANT to think that your OP wasn't a personal attack. Talk in circles all you want, but plain and simple, you posted her pic, ad and made a rude and tasteless comment about her appearance. Just because she isn't your type, does not mean she isn't some other guy's dream girl. (I mean really, check out her reviews....) Originally Posted by Jamieyoung

Rrrabbit...really? For a self proclaimed old wise man you sure do play the role of s child quite well. I seem to remember you quoting me earlier in this thread and telling me to man up, so I am inquiring upon that previous statement...

Are you ever going to man up? Why do t you just act like a man and admit your mistakes and apologize to those you have verbally assaulted instead of defending yourself with a barrage of half wit rhetorical questions. Your not impressing anyone, and your digging your hole deeper. Please do Yourself a favor and

Rrrabbit...really? For a self proclaimed old wise man you sure do play the role of s child quite well. I seem to remember you quoting me earlier in this thread and telling me to man up, so I am inquiring upon that previous statement...

Are you ever going to man up? Why do t you just act like a man and admit your mistakes and apologize to those you have verbally assaulted instead of defending yourself with a barrage of half wit rhetorical questions. Your not impressing anyone, and your digging your hole deeper. Please do Yourself a favor and Originally Posted by Big Joe

Can you read, or is it a case of short attention poo ?

How's that for a rhetorical Q?

nighty night bunny!!

hey now!! 64 posts!!!

I feel so special, i have not had the chance to read through this yet but i want to say thanks to all of you who had nice things to say about me! you dont understand how much it means to me...

Now bunny listen here, this thread is about me dammit! I see you needed some attention and wanted to use me to do it but PLEASE STOP STEALING MY SHINE!!! Originally Posted by Jules Jaguar

Jules get ya SHINE ON! ..and maybe a big bunny tatt for your next 1? lol

Its fine that someone doesn't like tattoos, but to single a lady out on the board who is respected by most is uncalled for. : Originally Posted by MsElena

This thread has made me wonder about how we decide what is and is not acceptable behavior. I quote MsElena not because she is the only one to express this type of view, but because she stated it the most eloquently.

Why does the attractiveness and/or decency of the person involved make an attack unacceptable? It's important here to make a distinction between posts about finding the provider attractive, which is a difference of opinion in a matter of taste, and citing the provider's attractiveness as a reason not to malign them.
(Whether that attack is merely perceived or is real makes no difference for this part of the discussion since my thoughts are about the reasons given for the defense.)

Would singling out a lady who was not widely respected be less of a breach of civility? If a gal trully was ugly, would that make it OK to disparage her?

I don't have received wisdom from on high, I'm just a guy with an opinion and an asshole just like everyone else. It seems to me that our reaction as a society that it's not OK to dis someone because they are a decent person is inherently unfair to non-decent persons. If an action is not acceptable to one, I think it is not acceptable to all. A person's humanity should be enough to protect them from harm.

This thread has made me wonder about how we decide what is and is not acceptable behavior. I quote MsElena not because she is the only one to express this type of view, but because she stated it the most eloquently.

Why does the attractiveness and/or decency of the person involved make an attack unacceptable? It's important here to make a distinction between posts about finding the provider attractive, which is a difference of opinion in a matter of taste, and citing the provider's attractiveness as a reason not to malign them.
(Whether that attack is merely perceived or is real makes no difference for this part of the discussion since my thoughts are about the reasons given for the defense.)

Would singling out a lady who was not widely respected be less of a breach of civility? If a gal trully was ugly, would that make it OK to disparage her?

I don't have received wisdom from on high, I'm just a guy with an opinion and an asshole just like everyone else. It seems to me that our reaction as a society that it's not OK to dis someone because they are a decent person is inherently unfair to non-decent persons. If an action is not acceptable to one, I think it is not acceptable to all. A person's humanity should be enough to protect them from harm. Originally Posted by googol^googol

Good post and agree with you 110%.

That being out of the way, let's now define good looking and ugly.

I submit that there is no "true" definition of such because as should be obvious through this thread, it's all subject to individual interpretation. Sure there is a socially acceptable "norm", but that varies from culture to culture, and region to region. So let's not even go there.

If we can agree that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, then the next part of the mathematical proof moves onto "harm" and "humanity".

What is "harm" and "humanity"? Who is responsible for establishing an entity's reputation, and who's responsible for its subsequent harm/demise ?

Many factors are at play in any real life scenario. In all instances, the business owner has the decision making power, and therefore has the most DEGREE of control.

The owner/s are subject to varied market influxes, in whatever shape and form it rears its ugly head. And how they respond to these variables is what determines their degree of success or demise.

We become WHAT WE MAKE AN EFFORT towards, or we become the complacent, the meek and the needy. The the answer to success lies not in today, but is more of a journey towards maturity: "How much of myself, my actions and consequences am I consciously willing to be responsible for ?". And this, I believe, is a lifelong destination.

As a business owner, pointing fingers is equivalent to relying on dumb luck.

Attachment 61390 Originally Posted by ~Ze~

Hey GODDAMMIT! I resemble that remark!