Oh No'es! The Biden laptop story isn't going

HedonistForever's Avatar
Well, even the Trump-loving Fox News has passed on pursuing the story. If it had even the tiniest shred of credibility they would be all over it like flies on shit.

But you keep getting your news from FaceBook and Qanon and be happy in your gullibility, okay? Originally Posted by SlowHand50

Says the guy who has never turned on Fox News in his life. Of course what he meant to say is NOBODY but Fox News and the New York Post are covering the story.


Try tuning in to Tucker if you want to see what "covering the story" looks like.


But let me bring you up to date. Begrudgingly, today the FBI and DOJ agreed with the DNI ( I wonder how long it will take S L O W H A N D to look up those agencies ) that indeed the FBI has the laptop and agreed with the DOJ that this story is not Russian disinformation. Third party sources have confirmed the legitimacy of the e-mails and this story will not be able to be ignored any more.


As i said in another thread, it may not be in time to stop Biden from being elected but I'll predict with some confidence right now, that if Biden wins, he will be impeached before this is all over and Commala will be President.


I hope I have to come back here and admit for the first time in my life, I was wrong.
TryWeakly's Avatar
awesome....red wave a comin
TryWeakly's Avatar
TryWeakly's Avatar
Time will tell....sparky. Originally Posted by TryWeakly
Ahem.....








TOLD YA




Bitches...
TryWeakly's Avatar
..and still nothimg on CNN...


bahahahahah


They probably having an oh shit moment
It’s a dead story. No one cares.
TryWeakly's Avatar
Ill bet you also think Bill was innocent...


Why_Yes_I_Do's Avatar
$100 for the gang fuck
And another hundo for the Greek.

FBI, DOJ Concur: Hunter Biden Laptop, Emails NOT ‘Russian Disinformation’

Plus an extra $50 tip for being good sports and supplying your own anal lube.
Thanks, we owe you a nice review with compelling ROS.
No one cares. Let’s assume Hunter was dirty. He’s not running. Let’s assume he was running a graft op for Joe, that’ll never be proven. Hunter can put whatever he wants in an email, Joe wasn’t on it and can deny any knowledge of Hunter’s operation. Even if he knew, can’t prove it. He’ll just deny it and Hunter actually hasn’t done anything illegal so there’s no threat which would cause him to implicate Joe. Still only left with innuendo and assumption that Joe knew.

We are back to the Trump tower meeting. The kid’s action isn’t illegal and can’t be traced to the father.

Let’s assume Joe is dirty as hell. He’s running against someone that’s dirtier or we call them equally corrupt. But Trump has been a shit President that’s plain unlikable. So given a choice between corrupt Joe and corrupt Trump, Joe remains the better choice.

In order to prove Joe is culpable of some crime, the money has to be shown to actually have been received by him. Or the financial benefit received by him as a bribe for an official action. That’ll never get proven as Hunter will just take all the blame. Once again not illegal, no matter what he said or did.

Dead story that will not change votes, won’t end in impeachment and will just be a rally cry for Trumpys that Joe is dirty Too. But no one but Trumpys will care.

On the other hand. Trump will be charged with crimes in NY state and by the US Attorney for the Southern District. Now that’s gonna be fun.
winn dixie's Avatar
No one cares. Let’s assume Hunter was dirty. He’s not running. Let’s assume he was running a graft op for Joe, that’ll never be proven. Hunter can put whatever he wants in an email, Joe wasn’t on it and can deny any knowledge of Hunter’s operation. Even if he knew, can’t prove it. He’ll just deny it and Hunter actually hasn’t done anything illegal so there’s no threat which would cause him to implicate Joe. Still only left with innuendo and assumption that Joe knew.

We are back to the Trump tower meeting. The kid’s action isn’t illegal and can’t be traced to the father.

Let’s assume Joe is dirty as hell. He’s running against someone that’s dirtier or we call them equally corrupt. But Trump has been a shit President that’s plain unlikable. So given a choice between corrupt Joe and corrupt Trump, Joe remains the better choice.

In order to prove Joe is culpable of some crime, the money has to be shown to actually have been received by him. Or the financial benefit received by him as a bribe for an official action. That’ll never get proven as Hunter will just take all the blame. Once again not illegal, no matter what he said or did.

Dead story that will not change votes, won’t end in impeachment and will just be a rally cry for Trumpys that Joe is dirty Too. But no one but Trumpys will care.

On the other hand. Trump will be charged with crimes in NY state and by the US Attorney for the Southern District. Now that’s gonna be fun. Originally Posted by 1blackman1
Double standard here!

Typical arrogance
TryWeakly's Avatar
No...... typical IGNORANCE.
Why_Yes_I_Do's Avatar
Well, even the Trump-loving Fox News has passed on pursuing the story. ... Originally Posted by SlowHand50

Might be true. Steve Bannon has probably dropped the story like a hot potato and lost interest. So makes sense that Fox would walk away from it as well. I'll check Fox for ya.


I found this from yesterday


8 min
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdmOWjVaR20


I'm no zoologist, but it seems Honey Badger still don't give a shit.
Why_Yes_I_Do's Avatar
...In order to prove Joe is culpable of some crime, the money has to be shown to actually have been received by him.... Originally Posted by 1blackman1

Even playing shell games through shell companies is going to leave a paper trail.What? You think they are just going to deposit cash of that magnitude through an ATM somewhere on the sketchy side of town?
As I stated before. Hunter will just take all the blame. It’ll never track to Joe. Hunter can take all the money he wants and it’s not illegal no matter how shady. Joe can only be charged with bribery if there’s an exchange of money and an official act that’s predicated on the money. That’ll never get proven because Hunter would have been the intermediary. Hunter will maintain this was all him suckering Ukrainians without Joe’s knowledge. Hence Joe will be fine. And thus far the only official act that Joe appears to have made is getting the prosecutor fired. It’s been well established that it was ongoing US and European policy to seek that result. Tying that action, which was already being pursued, to a money exchange will be near impossible.

The story may sound sexy but it’s dead on arrival. Nothing will track back to Joe, Hunter will say it was his doing, and Joe will deny knowledge of anything Hunter was doing.

Story is dead.
rexdutchman's Avatar
Just remember 10 million "to the big guy" Its funny how the Russian conspiracy ( paid for by the Clintons) was a thing for 4 years (nothing burger) but this is nothing "don't look this way"""""