No, no, no. That is NOT the court's job. The Court's job is to apply the law as it was intended to be applied by those who wrote it. "Well, the Constitution says green, but green is out of date, so we say they meant red." Bullshit. There is an abundance of material that explains EXACTLY what the Founders meant when they wrote the 2nd amendment. In this case, the Justice is either lazy or stupid. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuyWhat world do you live in? Certainly not the world of reality. DC v. Heller. McDonald v. Chicago. Such a simple question yet the case made it all the way to the Supreme Court, and passed by a minimum 5-4 decision. No matter which side of the aisle you are sitting, there is a great deal of controversy over exactly what the 2nd Amendment means.
Just for kicks, what is your interpretation of the 2nd Amendment? Not looking to argue, just interested in other's opinions.