My last review.....

SUCH a fucking sissy!! LOl annie.. (not bored anymore) Originally Posted by annie@christophers

Hot flashes and denture odor wont let you sleep?

What's the point of paying for ROS when everyone is allowed to access it without restriction? Think we will all get a refund for this month since Taylor has explained we did not receive premium services for our money and that the admin is aware, and allowed the breech? Originally Posted by muny4huny

You don't think providers should be able to read what's been written about them?

This isn't "everyone without restriction," this is the woman who someone met with and is claiming to write a truthful account about.

I mean, we can read our full reviews on TER, and TER is far more respected than ECCIE...

YOUR RIGHT.. try picking on a woman...you hide behind fake shit everyday.. at least that girl wrote what she thought to be correct..BEFORE ya start calling us lovers/biz partners/drunks/cops/feds/exc....let me say this.. YOUR FAKE AT EVERYTHING YOU DO>>IF YA AINT IN A WHEELCHAIR YA COULD BE.. we ALL knew what she said was wrong..she obviously DID NOT KNOW THAT..I like the chick... kinda reminds me of....WELL ..ME!!

+1

You don't think providers should be able to read what's been written about them?

This isn't "everyone without restriction," this is the woman who someone met with and is claiming to write a truthful account about.

I mean, we can read our full reviews on TER, and TER is far more respected than ECCIE... Originally Posted by Annie Calhoun

As Ike said, you can have the reviewer send the review to you, but you cant bring out ROS details in open forum(nobody can, reviewer nor provider) nor can you create a stem account to gain access to the ROS area. That is what Taylor and Keri did, while they may argue they did not, the evidence is far more telling of the truth. Were you asleep while your session was going on? Then you already know what the review will say unless the fella left unhappy in which case you already know that as well. Fix the session issue don't attack the review and turn it into a battle royale. Fact is simple here, two people had a bad meeting and one discussed it under the guidelines and the other broke the rules. The issue is not about changing the rules and roll back the clock on her violation, the issue is that she violated and that was wrong.

YOUR RIGHT.. try picking on a woman...you hide behind fake shit everyday.. at least that girl wrote what she thought to be correct..BEFORE ya start calling us lovers/biz partners/drunks/cops/feds/exc....let me say this.. YOUR FAKE AT EVERYTHING YOU DO>>IF YA AINT IN A WHEELCHAIR YA COULD BE.. we ALL knew what she said was wrong..she obviously DID NOT KNOW THAT..I like the chick... kinda reminds me of....WELL ..ME!! Originally Posted by annie@christophers

Annie go to bed, you are showing how little you have paid attention here. She KNEW what she was doing was wrong and even LIED by saying a supermod and a mod told her to do it. Put down the damn bottle and sound out the words, if you are having trouble with the large words then please use Google. As for me being fake, I may very well be an asshole but at least I am not a drunk pimptress with mental issues and paranoia.

Were you asleep while your session was going on? Then you already know what the review will say unless the fella left unhappy in which case you already know that as well. Originally Posted by muny4huny

Oh come on. If you really believe that every client is 100% truthful about what happened in a session, and the only possible explanation for a not-so-stellar review in which he states that he wasn't 100% satisfied is that the provider has a "session issue" she needs to "fix," then I have like 15 bridges to sell you in Brooklyn.

Oh come on. If you really believe that every client is 100% truthful about what happened in a session, and the only possible explanation for a not-so-stellar review in which he states that he wasn't 100% satisfied is that the provider has a "session issue" she needs to "fix," then I have like 15 bridges to sell you in Brooklyn. Originally Posted by Annie Calhoun

If you believe every provider is 100% honest then you must have just been born yesterday, they lie for a living, welcome to the hobby. Again the issue is still not honesty, it is about the regulations set forth on ROS info.

YOUR A DICK.....simple..

For all the people that complain about ECCIE and the rules.....they never seem to leave. Go make your own board, set your own rules.

Many have tried...almost all have failed......but please if you can do it better....go set up your own board.


Obey the rules and you don't have problems 99.99% of the time. Simple as that.

Most of the time when a guy writes a review saying he had a so-so time....no one cares, blames it on the guy not clicking with the provider. Especially when it is 1 review out of many many positive reviews. However, when you start this back and forth....people suddenly know about everything, have their own opinion, and suddenly know more than the two people who were even in that room by their lonesomes.

So who does these back and forth discussions really help or hurt? Well, in 3 days this will be on page 2 and no one will see it.


Tempest in a tea cup.

One thing I really did like about Niki (i never met her) but when she got a bad review....she went out and got 10 or so good reviews and that bad review was pushed to the second page. She handled it classy, she took care of business in probably what many guys who did meet her would say was her best way....between the sheets.


God, I sound like a white knight and I never even met her.....excuse me while I go vomit......

If you believe every provider is 100% honest then you must have just been born yesterday Originally Posted by muny4huny

I never claimed that, genius. Your argument is invalid; try again.

I never claimed that, genius. Your argument is invalid; try again. Originally Posted by Annie Calhoun

Actually his argument is valid. You claim not all men are 100% honest, so it stands to reason that not all women are 100% honest. This is human nature, to fib, lie, exaggerate, etc.

Logical, but may not be what you meant to argue, but your argument can be extrapolated for his counter argument.

Your witness consular...

Not bored but VERY sleepy..NITE YA'LL NUTS...xxoo annie

Actually his argument is valid. You claim not all men are 100% honest, so it stands to reason that not all women are 100% honest. This is human nature, to fib, lie, exaggerate, etc.

Logical, but may not be what you meant to argue, but your argument can be extrapolated for his counter argument. Originally Posted by disilene

...

You...are really bad at this. Go back, read it again, and then tell me his argument is valid.

Him: It is not possible for an apple to be green.
Me: Actually, yeah it is. If you don't believe that some apples are green, you're not very bright.
Him: OH SO YOU'RE SAYING THAT NO GRAPES ARE GREEN!!!!??!?!? YOU'RE WRONG HAHAHAHAH!
Me: Uhh...what?

I'm going to bed.