Where's the rationality in the BLM's claim that it is saving the desert tortoise from cattle while willingly sacrificing the desert tortoise and its habitat to the bulldozers of the moneyed and politically connected you exiled in Dixie and very ignorant Yankee jackass: and how is that not "arbitrary" enforcement? Originally Posted by I B HankeringWell, here is ONE possible rational basis. Bundy's large herd will roam over thousands of acres. The solar farm will cover - what? - maybe 10 acres?
The benefit of clean energy from solar panels will more than offset the relatively limited harm done to the tortoise.
On the other hand, Bundy's herd will do a far greater amount of damage in the long run and the US can get all the beef it needs from other herds that do not graze in areas where there are threatened species
How is that for a rational basis, you tranny fuckee?
Can you disprove any of that?