What is it with you guys?Now we have come full circle.
You know very well you were calling Ansley stupid. don't hide behind a Googled inference. Originally Posted by Marcus Aurelius
1) Lauren Googled inferencing EH, then leaves when called out on it by me.
2) MA starts a thread calling me out for calling Lauren out.
3) Now MA is calling EH out for Googled inferencing Ansley!
4) Yet he would not call out Lauren Summerhill for Googled inferencing EH.
Hot damn. Good luck on that transparency atl.
Plus I did not call Ansley stupid...there is a difference between being called out on something you have done that was stupid and being called stupid! ......however slight
Not only is this a ridiculous thing to say, you did nothing here but perpetuate a generalization that has no factual basis.
I'm sorry, if I weren't feeling so awkward and confused right now.....I wouldn't be lashing out like this!! Originally Posted by Ed Highlight
I agreed in my post that it's a generalization: "accurate or not, this is often considered"
Thus: it is not my opinion, but my statement that a generalization exists. If you re-read my post, the part that reflects my opinion is genderless.
Count me as unapologetic twice in one thread. Originally Posted by Lauren Summerhill
I am insulted that atl quoted himself......can he have a check mark, please? Originally Posted by dearhunter
I get my name on the board first Originally Posted by atlcomedyI couldn't think of a more deserving person in this forum!